I thought he caught him high in the neck region without going back to look at it, which would be similar to Hughes.Which Tyler wrote:I'd need to see it again, but I don't recall Ewells hitting Trinder in the head with a swinging arm
England squad named
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England squad named
-
- Posts: 12119
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England squad named
Hughes’ was much worse than that.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England squad named
Hughes might have had more of a swinging arm and greater speed of contact, but the actual connection seemed similar in nature
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9138
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: England squad named
Can anyone be arsed to go find video clips though? Otherwise it sounds like we're all talking out of our arses trying to remember a brief clip from a little while ago.
- Puja
- Posts: 17656
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England squad named
And there's the crux of the matter!Which Tyler wrote:Can anyone be arsed to go find video clips though? Otherwise it sounds like we're all talking out of our arses trying to remember a brief clip from a little while ago.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14556
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: England squad named
That’s the crux of the entire board!Puja wrote:And there's the crux of the matter!Which Tyler wrote:we're all talking out of our arses
Puja
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England squad named
I firmly believe I'm a voice of moderation and reason, the rest of you not so much. Mells was okay until he started quoting himself in his efforts to be more like Rowan.Mellsblue wrote:That’s the crux of the entire board!Puja wrote:And there's the crux of the matter!Which Tyler wrote:we're all talking out of our arses
Puja
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14556
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: England squad named
If you want to perfect talking out of your arse then who better to copy.Digby wrote:I firmly believe I'm a voice of moderation and reason, the rest of you not so much. Mells was okay until he started quoting himself in his efforts to be more like Rowan.Mellsblue wrote:That’s the crux of the entire board!Puja wrote:
And there's the crux of the matter!
Puja
-
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:03 pm
Re: England squad named
Olly Woodburn on his way to Portugal?
-
- Posts: 19097
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England squad named
surprising, but he does seem less error prone this yearDoorzetbornandbred wrote:Olly Woodburn on his way to Portugal?
-
- Posts: 5891
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: England squad named
doesnt the squad return today? apparently May is looking like he'll be fit for the Argentina game. England to review over the w/e if additional players reqd.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England squad named
Is Wade injured or now behind Woodburn? If the latter then blimey is the word which springs to mind, though there is Woodburn plays on the left.
-
- Posts: 19097
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England squad named
aye and ayeDigby wrote:Is Wade injured or now behind Woodburn? If the latter then blimey is the word which springs to mind, though there is Woodburn plays on the left.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14556
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: England squad named
Based on form it’s hard to argue. Based on a plethora of other metrics it’s hard not to argue.
-
- Posts: 12119
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England squad named
I clearly haven’t seen enough of Woodburn to see all his flaws. I can’t say he struck me as international quality at first but he’s playing as well as anyone. He seems a good all round talent but never paid much attention to his defence. Is it a concentration thing?
-
- Posts: 19097
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England squad named
it used to be, not so long ago. I'm told the issue has all but gone, and even had its existence questionedMikey Brown wrote:I clearly haven’t seen enough of Woodburn to see all his flaws. I can’t say he struck me as international quality at first but he’s playing as well as anyone. He seems a good all round talent but never paid much attention to his defence. Is it a concentration thing?

-
- Posts: 12119
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England squad named
Fair enough. Weirdly I would have had James Short in exactly the same bracket, who I had assumed would have had his wing spot this year after an impressive season last time out.
-
- Posts: 19097
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England squad named
He got injured, but he's a decent player....but behind Nowell and Woodburn seemingly anyway.Mikey Brown wrote:Fair enough. Weirdly I would have had James Short in exactly the same bracket, who I had assumed would have had his wing spot this year after an impressive season last time out.
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: England squad named
Every time I see Woodburn play he strikes me as a very effective player at AP level. It could be though that most of that arises by the way Exeter use him and play to his strengths. Underrated imo but agree that he doesn't look a world beater.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: England squad named
So an awful quality video of the scrummaging session is available. And if it is England facing (and seemingly going forwards on their put in), I'd guess Robshaw is seen as the backup 8? Is there another blond backrow?
- Puja
- Posts: 17656
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England squad named
Underhill's blond. But it would make sense for Robshaw to be the cover if we're having a flank on the bench, as he has played there before. Wouldn't be my first choice, but he'll do if Hughes gets injured.Raggs wrote:So an awful quality video of the scrummaging session is available. And if it is England facing (and seemingly going forwards on their put in), I'd guess Robshaw is seen as the backup 8? Is there another blond backrow?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 5975
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England squad named
Hmm - not sure I like the idea of Robshaw at 8. I’m sure he’d do a reasonable job of controlling the ball at the base of the scrum and linking with the scrum half but he’s not exactly known for his carrying threat.
I know Eddie called out Armand for lacking carrying power, but I’d say he’s a more powerful carrier than Robshaw and Wilson is probably better than both.
It’s OK as a stop-gap/emergency solution, but if Hughes were to go down in the 1st minute, I wouldn’t want Robshaw holding the fort at 8 for the other 79!
I know Eddie called out Armand for lacking carrying power, but I’d say he’s a more powerful carrier than Robshaw and Wilson is probably better than both.
It’s OK as a stop-gap/emergency solution, but if Hughes were to go down in the 1st minute, I wouldn’t want Robshaw holding the fort at 8 for the other 79!