I don't think we showed a lack of respect to Georgia. The point of the game was to try out new players - if we had played our first team we probably would have won by more points and learnt very little. I don't subscribe to the Western Mail's view that every game is a must win, not when long term development is involved.
The game was dire.
The farce at the end could be ended by the yellow carded prop (assuming its just a technical offence rather than anything malicious) being allowed to remain and another forward heading off. The team is still punished and scrum safety maintained. I'd also make players who are subbed be assessed for their ability to continue and this reported to the 4th official. If a subbed player is lounging around on the sidelines and not receiving treatment then its only fair to assume they can return. That would still be open to abuse but it makes the system a bit more transparent.
Digby's big Wales vs Georgia thread
Moderator: Puja
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Digby's big Wales vs Georgia thread
And if it was a malicious offence what then? Else we've just changed (reduced really) the number of instances in which this issue might arise
- Puja
- Posts: 17668
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Digby's big Wales vs Georgia thread
Sandydragon wrote: The farce at the end could be ended by the yellow carded prop (assuming its just a technical offence rather than anything malicious) being allowed to remain and another forward heading off. The team is still punished and scrum safety maintained. I'd also make players who are subbed be assessed for their ability to continue and this reported to the 4th official. If a subbed player is lounging around on the sidelines and not receiving treatment then its only fair to assume they can return. That would still be open to abuse but it makes the system a bit more transparent.

Players are already nominated as injured or tactical subs though and your t/h was officially subbed as tactical. However, the official line is that he developed cramp on the sideline and was thus "injured".
Puja
Backist Monk
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Digby's big Wales vs Georgia thread
I suppose there is no getting around it in that situation - and I thought there was a law that stated that if a team went uncontested too early they forfeit the game - or was that one of those laws discussed but never implemented?Digby wrote:And if it was a malicious offence what then? Else we've just changed (reduced really) the number of instances in which this issue might arise
If a player is tactically subbed and it transpired they have an injury, their status should be changed. That is still open to abuse but at least it avoids confusion at an event.
- Puja
- Posts: 17668
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Digby's big Wales vs Georgia thread
At the lower levels, that's true, but I don't believe it holds for the pro game. Can you imagine the uproar if NZ were knocked out of the RWC because of two freak tighthead injures in the first 5 minutes?Sandydragon wrote:I suppose there is no getting around it in that situation - and I thought there was a law that stated that if a team went uncontested too early they forfeit the game - or was that one of those laws discussed but never implemented?Digby wrote:And if it was a malicious offence what then? Else we've just changed (reduced really) the number of instances in which this issue might arise
If a player is tactically subbed and it transpired they have an injury, their status should be changed. That is still open to abuse but at least it avoids confusion at an event.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:46 am
Re: Digby's big Wales vs Georgia thread
Well I lost my £5, but even if Georgia had a converted try it would only have been a draw.
It does make the 6N look poor - Italy p*ssed about playing no-contact at Twickenham this year. Georgia would at least have given us a game.
It does make the 6N look poor - Italy p*ssed about playing no-contact at Twickenham this year. Georgia would at least have given us a game.
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:18 pm
Re: Digby's big Wales vs Georgia thread
It'd be fine, they'd blame Wayne Barnes.Puja wrote:At the lower levels, that's true, but I don't believe it holds for the pro game. Can you imagine the uproar if NZ were knocked out of the RWC because of two freak tighthead injures in the first 5 minutes?Sandydragon wrote:I suppose there is no getting around it in that situation - and I thought there was a law that stated that if a team went uncontested too early they forfeit the game - or was that one of those laws discussed but never implemented?Digby wrote:And if it was a malicious offence what then? Else we've just changed (reduced really) the number of instances in which this issue might arise
If a player is tactically subbed and it transpired they have an injury, their status should be changed. That is still open to abuse but at least it avoids confusion at an event.
Puja
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Digby's big Wales vs Georgia thread
Fun fact of the day:
The last time Wales beat NZ Sam Whitelock’s grandfather was making his internatonal debut.
The last time Wales beat NZ Sam Whitelock’s grandfather was making his internatonal debut.
- rowan
- Posts: 7750
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Digby's big Wales vs Georgia thread
WowMellsblue wrote:Fun fact of the day:
The last time Wales beat NZ Sam Whitelock’s grandfather was making his internatonal debut.


If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?