Of course it is; but thats a couple of months away. Who will be fit then?Oakboy wrote:I accept that. However, the 6N is a must-win, IMO. The next time Eddie has the players together it IS to pick his best available 23. Yes, the RWC is not tomorrow but we have to start building a team. At present we have a reasonable group of players with hardly any cohesion. We are butchering chances, not so much because of individual skill-flaws (except for Brown), but because we lack unit-based practice. Nothing looks slick and co-ordinated in attack.Banquo wrote:Dors- I wouldn't get too fixated on knowing exactly the starting 23 for the nearly two years away world cup. You may not like it, but the majority of the squad are pretty much established and settled in EJ's mind, with some strong contenders around the edges; in any case, knowing your 23 now means nothing for the RWC- injuries and imo age will force change- plus talent could easily emerge. Nobody is picking a win at all costs game tomorrow- that's the point of why he is looking at options.Oakboy wrote:If Eddie is done with experimenting, has anyone forced their way past Ford/Farrell/Joseph to make him change anything at 10/12/13? T'eo hasn't played. Tuilagi is always injured. Slade and Lozowski have offered a mixed bag without convincing.
Eddie now has to pick a team to win with no base of continuity to work from.
In the forwards, a simple form check might pick front and second rows from strength. Similarly, three from four - Brown, Watson, Daly and May - gives a convincing back unit.
Back-row? Robshaw and Billy to start but who gets the 3rd shirt? If I was picking a team to win at all costs tomorrow I'd not be sure of Underhill or Simmonds.
Quality of ball is the biggest issue we have.