Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 5893
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Leicester: Tait; Thompstone, Tuilagi, Toomua, May; Ford, B Youngs; Mulipola, T Youngs (captain), Cole, Fitzgerald, Kitchener, Mapapalangi, Williams, Kalafamoni.
Replacements: Polota-Nau, Traynor, Baumann, Wells, Hamilton, Harrison, Ford, Malouf.
Saracens: Goode; Maitland Bosch Lozowski Wyles; Farrell, Spencer; Vunipola, George, Figallo, Skelton, Kruis, Isiekwe, Burger, Wray.
Replacements: Tolofua, Barrington, Koch, Rhodes, Clark, Whiteley, Tompkins, Earle.
Replacements: Polota-Nau, Traynor, Baumann, Wells, Hamilton, Harrison, Ford, Malouf.
Saracens: Goode; Maitland Bosch Lozowski Wyles; Farrell, Spencer; Vunipola, George, Figallo, Skelton, Kruis, Isiekwe, Burger, Wray.
Replacements: Tolofua, Barrington, Koch, Rhodes, Clark, Whiteley, Tompkins, Earle.
- Puja
- Posts: 17674
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Thank you 5p - appreciated as always. Our back row balance still is not right, but on the bright side, Sarries are still playing a lock at 6, so maybe it'll balance out.
Looking forward to seeing that backline now that the centres have had 80 minutes to shake some of the rustiness off.
Puja
Looking forward to seeing that backline now that the centres have had 80 minutes to shake some of the rustiness off.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Sarries fans, is Henry Taylor injured?
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6366
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
That Leicester bench won't exactly make Saracens quake.
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Yeh that sarries bench in the forwards is massive.
-
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Hope that's allowed.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
What. An. Offload.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Great kick from a test match animal.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
End to end stuff from a Leicester v Sarries match. Merry Christmas everyone.
-
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Skelton looks like a different guy having lost all that weight.
-
- Posts: 5981
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Entertaining game so far.
Mike Williams really is w@nk though. I thought he was rubbish against Munster and he’s been worse today. He carries like a fanny and for a player reputed to bring aggression, I think he’s looked powderpuff in defence too.
Mike Williams really is w@nk though. I thought he was rubbish against Munster and he’s been worse today. He carries like a fanny and for a player reputed to bring aggression, I think he’s looked powderpuff in defence too.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
It's not just Williams. All the Leicester ball carriers are making little impression. They seem content to seek contact and just run into the nearest defender without loooking for an offload.Scrumhead wrote:Entertaining game so far.
Mike Williams really is w@nk though. I thought he was rubbish against Munster and he’s been worse today. He carries like a fanny and for a player reputed to bring aggression, I think he’s looked powderpuff in defence too.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Rank average?twitchy wrote:Skelton looks like a different guy having lost all that weight.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
What is a positive interaction? Farrell had 1/1 for kicks and I thought his kick through was a waste of good, quick, attacking possession. As for a ‘positive pass’ being solely down to accuracy, that’s utter balls. As Goode then pointed out. He also pointed out that a flyhalf is very much reliant on the quality of ball, of those on his team and the opposition. As always, stats are only useful if used as context rather than unarguable facts.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6366
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Why didn't the ref card Kitchener for such blatant rudeness? It was open dissent.
-
- Posts: 5981
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
No it isn’t just Williams but for a guy who was touted as an England’s contender he’s looked particularly poor. It’s saying something when Jackson Wray looks like a World-beater in comparison.Spiffy wrote:It's not just Williams. All the Leicester ball carriers are making little impression. They seem content to seek contact and just run into the nearest defender without loooking for an offload.Scrumhead wrote:Entertaining game so far.
Mike Williams really is w@nk though. I thought he was rubbish against Munster and he’s been worse today. He carries like a fanny and for a player reputed to bring aggression, I think he’s looked powderpuff in defence too.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Sarries should be out of sight here. They’ve bombed 3/4 try’s.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
What a horror show from Youngs.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
I thought Farrell looked a class above everyone else tbh.Mellsblue wrote:What is a positive interaction? Farrell had 1/1 for kicks and I thought his kick through was a waste of good, quick, attacking possession. As for a ‘positive pass’ being solely down to accuracy, that’s utter balls. As Goode then pointed out. He also pointed out that a flyhalf is very much reliant on the quality of ball, of those on his team and the opposition. As always, stats are only useful if used as context rather than unarguable facts.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6366
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Tuilagi looks at least a dozen games away from being match-sharp. Mako had a pretty awful match.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6366
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
What did you think of Spencer?Mellsblue wrote:What a horror show from Youngs.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Sarries scrum was crap, of which Mako is a part of course. In open play he was very good I thought.Oakboy wrote:Mako had a pretty awful match.
-
- Posts: 5893
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Outside of the scrum (where Cole completely dominated Mako) Sarries were far superior. They werent at their best but did enough to end their losing run. i thought Spencer was excellent and Wray a deserved moTM. Isiekwe is no back rower but is going to be some lock when he fills out a bit.
Manu is miles off international pace, but that is to be expected given his lack of game time.
Manu is miles off international pace, but that is to be expected given his lack of game time.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Tigers v Saracens Sun 3pm
Largely agree with that. A Sarries team that’s been winning would have won that by 20. Add in their injured blokes and there is a gulf between the two teams. Tigers will be alsorans until they overhaul the back 5 of their scrum.fivepointer wrote:Outside of the scrum (where Cole completely dominated Mako) Sarries were far superior. They werent at their best but did enough to end their losing run. i thought Spencer was excellent and Wray a deserved moTM. Isiekwe is no back rower but is going to be some lock when he fills out a bit.
Manu is miles off international pace, but that is to be expected given his lack of game time.