Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9145
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Which Tyler »

Worcester:
15 Chris Pennell
14 Bryce Heem
13 Jackson Willison
12 Ryan Mills
11 Josh Adams
10 Sam Olver
9 Francois Hougaard

1 Ethan Waller
2 Jack Singleton
3 Gareth Milasinovich
4 Donncha O’Callaghan (c)
5 Will Spencer
6 David Denton
7 Sam Lewis
8 GJ van Velze

16 Joe Taufete’e, 17 Ryan Bower, 18 Simon Kerrod, 19 Darren Barry, 20 Alafoti Faosiliva
21 Michael Dowsett, 22 Jamie Shillcock, 23 Perry Humphreys

Bath:
15. Anthony Watson
14. Jack Wilson
13. Jonathan Joseph
12. Ben Tapuai
11. Aled Brew
10. Rhys Priestland
9. Chris Cook

1. Beno Obano
2. Tom Dunn
3. Henry Thomas
4. James Phillips
5. Elliott Stooke
6. Matt Garvey (c)
7. Paul Grant
8. Zach Mercer

16. Michael van Vuuren; 17. Lucas Noguera; 18. Max Lahiff; 19. Levi Douglas; 20. Josh Bayliss
21. Kahn Fotuali’i; 22. Freddie Burns; 23. James Wilson
fivepointer
Posts: 5893
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by fivepointer »

Tricky game to call. Wuss have improved while Bath are struggling with form and injuries (only 1 fit lock!) I wouldnt be shocked with a narrow home win.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5980
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Scrumhead »

100% agree. If Worcester had Lance fit, I’d have had them down as favourites.

Without wanting to be harsh, I just don’t think Olver is up to standard but I still think there’s a good chance of Worcester nicking this one at Sixways.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17670
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Puja »

Incidentally, if Worcester win, then Northampton officially become London Irish's closest challengers for relegation, at least for a day (and with them facing Gloucester, maybe longer). Looking at the sides laid out, I think they've got a reasonable chance.

Worcester have built a very quietly effective team. Youngsters like Singleton have come through, there's been canny undervalued signings like Waller, Spencer, Lewis, and Denton - it's oddly like they're the blueprint for our "Budget Pack" thread. In the backs, Hougaard's been a driving force for quality and Mills is looking like the player that we hoped he'd be, once upon an age grade. And they're spoiled for choice on the wings. I hope they manage to keep it together for next season, because it's really interesting to see.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19123
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote:Incidentally, if Worcester win, then Northampton officially become London Irish's closest challengers for relegation, at least for a day (and with them facing Gloucester, maybe longer). Looking at the sides laid out, I think they've got a reasonable chance.

Worcester have built a very quietly effective team. Youngsters like Singleton have come through, there's been canny undervalued signings like Waller, Spencer, Lewis, and Denton - it's oddly like they're the blueprint for our "Budget Pack" thread. In the backs, Hougaard's been a driving force for quality and Mills is looking like the player that we hoped he'd be, once upon an age grade. And they're spoiled for choice on the wings. I hope they manage to keep it together for next season, because it's really interesting to see.

Puja
Saints might be a classic ‘too good to go down’ !
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9145
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Which Tyler »

Banquo wrote: Saints might be a classic ‘too good to go down’ !
What? Again?
Banquo
Posts: 19123
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Banquo »

Which Tyler wrote:
Banquo wrote: Saints might be a classic ‘too good to go down’ !
What? Again?
Fair point
padprop
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by padprop »

Why do Bath never sign any injury cover? or have I missed someone they have signed. Havent seen Attwood for a while so I assume its a serious injury and their 3 available locks are well below the other top 4's standard.

I dont know why they have an obsession about flankers that can play second row and vice versa. Surely it would make more sense to commit to 5 locks (With one as a development) and 8 or so back rowers than 2-3 full time locks and and 10 back rowers in which a few can do a job in the row.
Peej
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Peej »

Worcester also scored 4 tries against Sarries last week at Alianz. It takes a pretty decent side to do that, even with Sarries' blip in defensive form. I'm backing a Warriors win. (edit: which will almost certainly result in a resounding Bath victory)
fivepointer
Posts: 5893
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by fivepointer »

Just a note that missing from Bath's selection tonight are - Auterac, Catt, Walker, Batty, Perenise, KPN, Charteris, Attwood, Ewels, Ellis, Falateau, Louw, Underhill - and thats just the forwards.
I think their injury list is the most severe in the Premiership.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Digby »

Peej wrote:Worcester also scored 4 tries against Sarries last week at Alianz. It takes a pretty decent side to do that, even with Sarries' blip in defensive form. I'm backing a Warriors win. (edit: which will almost certainly result in a resounding Bath victory)
I looked at Wuss last week and thought they could score tries, even to the point they might sneak a surprise win over the team Sarries had out, so much so I took a punt on them winning. It didn't work out but I can't see any reason they can't score more tries tonight
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9145
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Which Tyler »

padprop wrote:Why do Bath never sign any injury cover? or have I missed someone they have signed. Havent seen Attwood for a while so I assume its a serious injury and their 3 available locks are well below the other top 4's standard.

I dont know why they have an obsession about flankers that can play second row and vice versa. Surely it would make more sense to commit to 5 locks (With one as a development) and 8 or so back rowers than 2-3 full time locks and and 10 back rowers in which a few can do a job in the row.
We've brought in Noguero Paz, Charles, Prerenise, Andrews/Mitchell and Phillips after knowing the injury statuses of Catt, Batty/Walker, Knight, Thomas, KPN and Attwood. Bare in mind that the injury dispensation is C£400k. I strongly suspect that we've spent the entire dispensation, and whatever was left in reserve of the salary cap already.

As for our locks, Attwood is apparently over his knee injury (though we won't know for sure until he actually plays on it), but hurt his Quad in his first contact session back, Charteris and Ewels are both relatively short-term injuries.
We've 4 dedicated locks, plus another 2 locks (Phillips and Douglas) who can play backrow, and 7 dedicated backrowers plus 1 (Garvey) who can play lock as well (8 dedicated BR if you include GMercer).
Last edited by Which Tyler on Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9145
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Which Tyler »

fivepointer wrote:Just a note that missing from Bath's selection tonight are - Auterac, Catt, Walker, Batty, Perenise, KPN, Charteris, Attwood, Ewels, Ellis, Falateau, Louw, Underhill - and thats just the forwards.
I think their injury list is the most severe in the Premiership.
By my reckoning:
Catt, Auterac
Batty, Walker, Charles
Perenise, Knight, Palma-Newport
Attwood, Charteris, Ewels
Louw, Underhill, Ellis, Faletau
15
Clark
Rokoduguni,Banahan, Williams
Homer
5
There's talk that Allison (SH) and Lewis (The/IC) may also be injured, but no-one seems to know for sure.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9145
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Which Tyler »

At last, some possession!
Keep that up and this is eminently winnable
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by 16th man »

Good steam off the scrum playing conditions.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by twitchy »

Obano and his rap singing. 8-)
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Mellsblue »

Nice try. Simple yet effective.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Mellsblue »

twitchy wrote:Obano and his rap singing. 8-)
They’ll be discussing the ‘66 World Cup and Greaves v Hunter next.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9145
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Which Tyler »

Mellsblue wrote:Nice try. Simple yet effective.
Mostly made by the Wuss player pretending to be bath's FH, forcing Cook to run
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by 16th man »

Why did Heem not pass? Garvey has to be close to a yellow there.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by twitchy »

Been discussed loads but adams really is top quality isn't he.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9145
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Which Tyler »

We got away with that one.
I hate agreeing with Healey - at least he's neutral today though
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by twitchy »

Shame wuss didn't pull one back. Think that's the game.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9145
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Which Tyler »

twitchy wrote:Shame wuss didn't pull one back. Think that's the game.
I disagree, shame that they have this time; though I have to wonder how far players are allowed to role after being tackled these days (recurring theme this season)
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9145
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Wuss v Bath; BTSport, Friday night

Post by Which Tyler »

Phillips with the try all right 5s must dream of scoring.
Post Reply