Exeter v Montpelier Sat 3.15

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6366
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Exeter v Montpelier Sat 3.15

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote:
p/d wrote:
Banquo wrote: Great in the loose, and can't help feeling whoever is calling the lineouts needs to take a bit of pressure off him for the key ones- calling to 6 on your own 22 doesn't seem that bright. Bit of white line fever as well, but he's certainly a better bet than turgid Dylan.
Agree.

His work over the ball is first rate, and with ball in hand always makes some yardage in traffic. Think Simmonds put in a great shift whilst (IMHO) Ewers underwhelms as a ball carrier when further than a yard out.

How Armand isn't in the training squad remains a mystery
Ewers carried powerfully a couple of times I thought, including in the build up to his own try. Armand is really a 6 as well, but with Simmonds and LCD so good over the ball, it just about works.

LCD's throwing will hold him back unless he can find a way- but his and his mates scrummaging is excellent too.
Armand had at least as many steals as Simmonds. Why do you mention one as good over the ball and not the other? Confirmation bias? :D ;)
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Exeter v Montpelier Sat 3.15

Post by Mellsblue »

Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote:
p/d wrote: Agree.

His work over the ball is first rate, and with ball in hand always makes some yardage in traffic. Think Simmonds put in a great shift whilst (IMHO) Ewers underwhelms as a ball carrier when further than a yard out.

How Armand isn't in the training squad remains a mystery
Ewers carried powerfully a couple of times I thought, including in the build up to his own try. Armand is really a 6 as well, but with Simmonds and LCD so good over the ball, it just about works.

LCD's throwing will hold him back unless he can find a way- but his and his mates scrummaging is excellent too.
Armand had at least as many steals as Simmonds. Why do you mention one as good over the ball and not the other? Confirmation bias? :D ;)
Because between the three of them they don’t necessarily miss a ‘traditional’ 7. It wasn’t a comment that Simmonds is better over the ball than Armand but that they complement each other.
Banquo
Posts: 19123
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Exeter v Montpelier Sat 3.15

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote: Ewers carried powerfully a couple of times I thought, including in the build up to his own try. Armand is really a 6 as well, but with Simmonds and LCD so good over the ball, it just about works.

LCD's throwing will hold him back unless he can find a way- but his and his mates scrummaging is excellent too.
Armand had at least as many steals as Simmonds. Why do you mention one as good over the ball and not the other? Confirmation bias? :D ;)
Because between the three of them they don’t necessarily miss a ‘traditional’ 7. It wasn’t a comment that Simmonds is better over the ball than Armand but that they complement each other.
Exactly.

and I have nothing against Armand, at all.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6366
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Exeter v Montpelier Sat 3.15

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Armand had at least as many steals as Simmonds. Why do you mention one as good over the ball and not the other? Confirmation bias? :D ;)
Because between the three of them they don’t necessarily miss a ‘traditional’ 7. It wasn’t a comment that Simmonds is better over the ball than Armand but that they complement each other.
Exactly.

and I have nothing against Armand, at all.
It's no bloody fun when you don't argue . . . . :lol:
fivepointer
Posts: 5893
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Exeter v Montpelier Sat 3.15

Post by fivepointer »

Thought all the Exe back row were just terrific yesterday. Kvesic added another dimension when he came one. Armand should really be in any England squad but it looks like it will be just Simmonds who will get a call.
Post Reply