Like the fact that Ben Stokes assaulted someone?Banquo wrote:Trial by social media is the new thing isn’t it. Who cares about facts, law and rubbishing reputations when their is personal opinion to be aired and action to demandWaspInWales wrote:Was the information readily available at the time of posting?Banquo wrote: All I was saying was before you rush to a judgement on the end game, might be good to get a few source of info before making the call. I know its against all the rules of the internet. Bit like hanging Ben Stokes
......and at this particular point in time, with the particular circumstances around this squad, its a brave person, and man especially, who'd take it on tbh. I do think that it is a trickier role than many, simply because of the conditions.
Baroness Campbell's comments were posted a couple of days after Neville was appointed.
I can't be expected to trawl through dozens of articles before needing to react to news in an impulsive manner. This is Sparta, I mean this is the internet![]()
Oh and Ben Stokes is going down. Hanging is too good for him...public crucifixion or they may as well let him off!
Like many people's personal opinion that Phil Neville is not the right person for the job?
Indeed, people have to be careful passing opinion and making comments these days, especially online. Readers of such comments may take comments made in jest too seriously.
We could just ban comments and opinions from the internet, but then that would just leave porn and online terrorism websites.