Ratings
Moderator: Puja
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Ratings
Launchbury not good enough to get a rating?
-
- Posts: 5893
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Ratings
The ever reliable Stephen Jones.....
For me
Brown 7.5
Watson 6
JJ 6
Farrell 7
May 6.5
Ford 6
Care 5.5
Mako 7
Hartley 5.5
Cole 6
Launchbury 7
Itoje 5.5
Lawes 6.5
Robshaw 7
Simmonds 6
For me
Brown 7.5
Watson 6
JJ 6
Farrell 7
May 6.5
Ford 6
Care 5.5
Mako 7
Hartley 5.5
Cole 6
Launchbury 7
Itoje 5.5
Lawes 6.5
Robshaw 7
Simmonds 6
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: Ratings
That's the Sunday morning chuckle sorted.Mellsblue wrote:Stephen Jones:
Brown - 8
Watson - 6
Joseph - 5
Farrell - 9
May - 8
Ford - 8
Care - 8
Vunipola - 6
Hartley - 6
Cole - 7
Launchbury - 7
Itoje - 6
Lawes - 7
Robshaw - 5
Simmonds - 5
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Ratings
Yep. He used to annoy me but I now just shake my head and giggle.Beasties wrote:That's the Sunday morning chuckle sorted.Mellsblue wrote:Stephen Jones:
Brown - 8
Watson - 6
Joseph - 5
Farrell - 9
May - 8
Ford - 8
Care - 8
Vunipola - 6
Hartley - 6
Cole - 7
Launchbury - 7
Itoje - 6
Lawes - 7
Robshaw - 5
Simmonds - 5
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Ratings
what on earth does he watch? I guess the low scorers aren't big enough in Jones' book
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Ratings
Vunipola 7
Hartley 6
Cole 6
Launch 7
Itoje 6
Lawes 6
Robshaw 6
Simmonds 6
Care 6
Ford 7
May 7
Farrell 7
JJ 7
Watson 6
Brown 7
And without too much surprise coming in at above average and a little above average doesn't result in a coherent performance, but nobody stank the place out even if nobody stood out. The closest to 8s were probably Vunipola, Launch, Farrell and May
Hartley 6
Cole 6
Launch 7
Itoje 6
Lawes 6
Robshaw 6
Simmonds 6
Care 6
Ford 7
May 7
Farrell 7
JJ 7
Watson 6
Brown 7
And without too much surprise coming in at above average and a little above average doesn't result in a coherent performance, but nobody stank the place out even if nobody stood out. The closest to 8s were probably Vunipola, Launch, Farrell and May
-
- Posts: 12136
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Ratings
What on earth does Hartley get a 6 for? Occasionally surviving a very mild counter-ruck?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Ratings
A brilliant pre-match speech and wiping his own bottom.
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:19 am
Re: Ratings
Can we be sure either happened?Mellsblue wrote:A brilliant pre-match speech and wiping his own bottom.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Ratings
The Times:
Brown - 8
Watson - 6
Joseph - 7
Farrell - 9....’tackled ferociously’
May - 7
Ford - 8
Care - 7
Mako - 7
Hartley - 6
Cole - 7
Launchbury - 9
Itoje - 6
Lawes - 7.....’playing three locks is not quite working’
Robshaw - 7
Simmonds - 7
Brown - 8
Watson - 6
Joseph - 7
Farrell - 9....’tackled ferociously’
May - 7
Ford - 8
Care - 7
Mako - 7
Hartley - 6
Cole - 7
Launchbury - 9
Itoje - 6
Lawes - 7.....’playing three locks is not quite working’
Robshaw - 7
Simmonds - 7
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Ratings
Difficult to see why he'd need to do the latter with so many commentators have their heads up in there licking it cleanTheNomad wrote:Can we be sure either happened?Mellsblue wrote:A brilliant pre-match speech and wiping his own bottom.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Ratings
I'm just not buying for one moment a largely ineffective limp over the finish line home win over Wales warrants any 8s, and it certainly doesn't warrant any 9sMellsblue wrote:The Times:
Brown - 8
Watson - 6
Joseph - 7
Farrell - 9....’tackled ferociously’
May - 7
Ford - 8
Care - 7
Mako - 7
Hartley - 6
Cole - 7
Launchbury - 9
Itoje - 6
Lawes - 7.....’playing three locks is not quite working’
Robshaw - 7
Simmonds - 7
- Stom
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Ratings
Aye. Unless the team were shunt except 1 guy who dragged us through. But that definitely wasn't the case.Digby wrote:I'm just not buying for one moment a largely ineffective limp over the finish line home win over Wales warrants any 8s, and it certainly doesn't warrant any 9sMellsblue wrote:The Times:
Brown - 8
Watson - 6
Joseph - 7
Farrell - 9....’tackled ferociously’
May - 7
Ford - 8
Care - 7
Mako - 7
Hartley - 6
Cole - 7
Launchbury - 9
Itoje - 6
Lawes - 7.....’playing three locks is not quite working’
Robshaw - 7
Simmonds - 7
I thought Robshaw was good, Brown did well, Mako was excellent, Launch good, Care a step up until he tired, Farnell actually good.
Itoje, Lawes, Hartley, JJ, Ford and the wings were average.
Cole was poor.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Ratings
Not sure where to put this but it needs airing and this seemed the most appropriate place. Stephen Jones in his column today discussing E Jones’s poor selections:
‘.....how can Jones keep excluding from the main squad Cipriani, Dan Robson, Jake Cooper-Wooley, Dave Attwood, Josh Bassett, Christian Wade, Olly Woodburn, Jack Willis and all the others playing powerhouse rugby in Europe.’
‘.....how can Jones keep excluding from the main squad Cipriani, Dan Robson, Jake Cooper-Wooley, Dave Attwood, Josh Bassett, Christian Wade, Olly Woodburn, Jack Willis and all the others playing powerhouse rugby in Europe.’
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Ratings
What is powerhouse rugby? I don't remember that coming up on any rugby course
- Puja
- Posts: 17676
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Ratings
Dave Attwood who hasn't played a single minute of rugby this season? Oh yeah, he's bashing down the door Steve.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Ratings
Robson is the only one that really stands out there for me personally. Too early for Willis, JCW is good but nothing to really stand him apart compared to other options, Woodburn perhaps.