What next?

Moderator: Puja

Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: What next?

Post by Timbo »

Banquo wrote:
Scrumhead wrote:
Banquo wrote: That also reflects the unhealthy focus outside this forum, plus the fact that he is a fixture in the side. You should have been here when he hadn’t improved to OK. Even his staunchest critics have admitted he’s a decent squad member. What grates is the relentless crap about him in the press. He is also a totem of Eddies regime, with Hartley, so inevitably is a comment magnet.
Yep. This sums up my opinion on Farrell pretty well. However, I would say that he has shown a clear improvement in his running game (mainly at 12, but he also had a decent show-and-go yesterday) which suggests he has been working on that. If he could work on his tackling too, I would be reasonably happy with him at 12.
Well yes, he's improving, but suggests a low bar and high tolerance, given 'all' he needs to do, to be a decent 12 is develop his running game, vastly improve his defence...oh and his stilted passing especially left to right. Seriously, does any other player get such a luxury? 50 caps worth of improvement!!
Just as an aside, and this is a genuine question, not trying to point score or anything like that, but; how do you reconcile your opinion on Farrell with the fact that no current or ex coach, current or ex player, ex team mate, current team mate, pundit, rival, opponent etc, etc seems to even remotely share it? I’ve never heard any of the above ever describe him as over rated or no good or average, or even much in the way of too many mild criticisms tbh. Even a while after they’ve stopped coaching or playing with/against him. Very few players you could say that about.

I really rate Farrel highly, and so I struggle with some of the stuff I read on here, so I’m genuinely curious about this.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6369
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: What next?

Post by Oakboy »

My 23 for the 1st Test in SA, assuming all fit, would be:


Mako
LCD
Sinckler
Launchbury
Itoje
Robshaw
Billy
Armand
May
Robson
Cipriani
Slade
JJ
Daly
Watson


Marler
George
Williams
Lawes
Vellacott
Ford
Lozowski
Banquo
Posts: 19130
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: What next?

Post by Banquo »

Timbo wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Scrumhead wrote:
Yep. This sums up my opinion on Farrell pretty well. However, I would say that he has shown a clear improvement in his running game (mainly at 12, but he also had a decent show-and-go yesterday) which suggests he has been working on that. If he could work on his tackling too, I would be reasonably happy with him at 12.
Well yes, he's improving, but suggests a low bar and high tolerance, given 'all' he needs to do, to be a decent 12 is develop his running game, vastly improve his defence...oh and his stilted passing especially left to right. Seriously, does any other player get such a luxury? 50 caps worth of improvement!!
Just as an aside, and this is a genuine question, not trying to point score or anything like that, but; how do you reconcile your opinion on Farrell with the fact that no current or ex coach, current or ex player, ex team mate, current team mate, pundit, rival, opponent etc, etc seems to even remotely share it? I’ve never heard any of the above ever describe him as over rated or no good or average, or even much in the way of too many mild criticisms tbh. Even a while after they’ve stopped coaching or playing with/against him. Very few players you could say that about.

I really rate Farrel highly, and so I struggle with some of the stuff I read on here, so I’m genuinely curious about this.
Oh I agree, and find myself questioning my own sanity in the face of such overwhelming punditry. On the other hand, Stephen Jones of the ST is a fervent fan, and its not a bad rule of thumb to take the opposite view to him.

If you take a simple analysis of skills, where does he sit?
Running- has started to hit lines and see gaps, but not quick, no step or swerve I've ever seen
Tackling- almost literally hit and miss, front on tends to go high and miss; scrambling good. His positional play in defence internationally at 12 I say is poor, though it seems he has a misguided role to shoot out of line, so possibly working under daft instruction
Passing- he has a good long right to left pass; he struggles with timing instinctive short passes sometimes. Left to right passing can be a car crash; he grasses passes regularly that way.
Kicking from hand- consistent, but no great length in his kicking, line kicking very conservative; end over end v screw kick limits the range. He has shown good vision and execution when grubbering.
Kicking from tee/restarts/dg- his kicking from tee is good to very good, but not top of the tree. His restarts are ok, no more; doesn't seem to have match winning drop goals in the locker.
Contact skills- good over the ball.

Other attributes
Temperament- loses it too often, heart over head is inappropriate a lot of the time
Decision Making/game management- not the best peripheral vision, but is a good closer of a game. In a limited game plan, given parity on ball quality and possession, a good man; chasing the game, lacks vision imo. But will follow instructions.
Attitude/heart- coaches will love this in training, and on the park as above. You can't fault workrate and effort, even if a little of 'all wind no trousers'. I think this is what is meant by 'test match animal' :)

I'm trying to be objective, and maybe failing. But I think it shows he's someway short of being a maiden's prayer as a 'world class international back'. Its more than possible I'm entirely wrong, and indeed friends who I respect for their opinions on rugby rate Farrell highly. But I simply think his skills are below top international level, yet a whole array of people have him somewhere near the best in the world....might be a forwards thing though )
fivepointer
Posts: 5893
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: What next?

Post by fivepointer »

On Farrell i have realised resistance is futile. If so many good judges within the game rate him, then i've got to accept that my opinion (which chimes with Banquo's) is just plain wrong.
After all, club, country and representative coaches and players rate him so he's obviously got something that they appreciate and that is largely oblivious to me.
I would say that he has improved a lot over the last 2 seasons. Some of his kicking is first class and, while his distribution isnt flawless, he can pick out a pass a lot better then he used to.
I'm sure i'll grow to love him....
Last edited by fivepointer on Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
p/d
Posts: 3826
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: What next?

Post by p/d »

Banquo, wtf do we know....



12. Owen Farrell – England
Farell has become the complete rugby player such is his high-level of consistency and versatility where he can play at 10 or 12. The Saracens man oozed class throughout the tournament and was one of the leading lights for England. He was aggressive in defence, potent in attack and it should only be a matter of time before he is given the England captaincy.
Banquo
Posts: 19130
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: What next?

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote:On Farrell i have realised resistance is futile. If so many good judges within the game rate him, then i've got to accept that my opinion (which chimes with Banquo's) is just plain wrong.
After all, club, country and representative coaches and players rate him so he's obviously got something that they appreciate and that is largely oblivious to me.
I would say that he has improved a lot over the last 2 seasons. Some of his kicking is first class and, while his distribution isnt flawless, he can pick out a pass a lot better then he used to.
I'm sure i'll grow to love him....
Oh yes, he has improved his skills a lot with the ball. Which is kind of odd, but good.
Banquo
Posts: 19130
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: What next?

Post by Banquo »

p/d wrote:Banquo, wtf do we know....



12. Owen Farrell – England
Farell has become the complete rugby player such is his high-level of consistency and versatility where he can play at 10 or 12. The Saracens man oozed class throughout the tournament and was one of the leading lights for England. He was aggressive in defence, potent in attack and it should only be a matter of time before he is given the England captaincy.
stephen jones? Greenwood? Guscott? ANDY Farrell?
Last edited by Banquo on Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: What next?

Post by Raggs »

Agree banquo, very good description.

Any pundit that releases their article within 2 hours, who wasn't a professional coach or analyst, i take with a pinch of salt.
Banquo
Posts: 19130
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: What next?

Post by Banquo »

Raggs wrote:Agree banquo, very good description.

Any pundit that releases their article within 2 hours, who wasn't a professional coach or analyst, i take with a pinch of salt.
Cheers, it all seems obvious, but perhaps I'm blinded by the early years where he was so obviously a 'project' at the expense of better players.
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: What next?

Post by kk67 »

fivepointer wrote:On Farrell i have realised resistance is futile.
Sometimes it's just necessary to put partisan considerations to one side.
If it comes to war then Patchell is firing our ordinance.
p/d
Posts: 3826
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: What next?

Post by p/d »

Banquo wrote:
p/d wrote:Banquo, wtf do we know....



12. Owen Farrell – England
Farell has become the complete rugby player such is his high-level of consistency and versatility where he can play at 10 or 12. The Saracens man oozed class throughout the tournament and was one of the leading lights for England. He was aggressive in defence, potent in attack and it should only be a matter of time before he is given the England captaincy.
stephen jones? Greenwood? Guscott? ANDY Farrell?
Not a clue. Thought it might have been SCW, but on reading all 15 selections there was no mention of 2003
Banquo
Posts: 19130
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: What next?

Post by Banquo »

p/d wrote:
Banquo wrote:
p/d wrote:Banquo, wtf do we know....



12. Owen Farrell – England
Farell has become the complete rugby player such is his high-level of consistency and versatility where he can play at 10 or 12. The Saracens man oozed class throughout the tournament and was one of the leading lights for England. He was aggressive in defence, potent in attack and it should only be a matter of time before he is given the England captaincy.
stephen jones? Greenwood? Guscott? ANDY Farrell?
Not a clue. Thought it might have been SCW, but on reading all 15 selections there was no mention of 2003
:lol: :lol: was it the DT?
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: What next?

Post by WaspInWales »

Ask most serious rugby fans who they would have at 10 or 12 in a world team and I think Farrell would barely feature.

Ask the same question of pundits and analysts and I think most, well most British experts would have Farrell at 10 or 12.

Not sure how highly regarded Farrell is in SA, Oz or NZ though...but saying that, I'm not sure many NZ pundits would have Farrell in a team considering the alternatives available.

I think a lot of the regard Farrell seems to have from the ex-pros and pundits may stem from the respect that Farrell snr has.

Also, Owen broke into the senior game at a young age, seemed to do some things (kicking and tackling) fairly well and wore his heart on his sleeve. It wasn't long before the similarities were noted between him a Wilkinson, further enhancing his endorsement from the press. I thought Wilkinson was a far more rounded player than Farrell is, and the crazy thing is, Wilkinson got a lot of stick from some quarters for being limited.

I honestly can't ever imagine people admitting that they might be wrong on Farrell. Banquo's description of his pros and cons is spot on to me. He's not a bad player by any means, but he is nowhere near as good as we are being led to believe.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: What next?

Post by morepork »

You guys have had such dross at 12 for so long, including Owen's dad FFS, that having an actual union playing Englishman there seems almost novel.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9151
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: What next?

Post by Which Tyler »

Timbo wrote: I guess I’d say that I disagree with your premise, at least as far as his running in this 6Nations goes. I can think of lots of great lines and line breaks from him this championship. And a number of great passes and kicks too. So if we’re talking skill sets, do we have another 12 at his level? Not imo.

That said, I’d be happy to trial a Ford-Te’o-Joseph midfield, individually I rate them all, but I’m not convinced it’d be any better. My bet would be that it’d be worse tbh.
This seems to put you in in sync with the carpet majority of this board then (well, maybe "lots" is going too far).
We talk about Farrell a lot because he is the focus of a lot of talk. We have generally criticised him in the past, and more-or-less all of that was deserved.
I don't think there's a regular poster here who hasn't acknowledged his improved running lines, and his improved defensive discipline this season. I don't think there's anyone calling for him to be dropped further than the bench - and that only to try Ford/Cips alongside Te'o/Manu and Joseph/Daly and give them a fair crack at the whip, rather than Faz himself having to play 80 minutes of every match, so we never get to see what a backline without him can do.
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: What next?

Post by kk67 »

just lol.
I love you fecks.
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: What next?

Post by kk67 »

Kicking as a reckoning for a rugby player is balls.
Leigh is good but apart from him and Laidlaw we can forget about it.
Banquo
Posts: 19130
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: What next?

Post by Banquo »

Which Tyler wrote:
Timbo wrote: I guess I’d say that I disagree with your premise, at least as far as his running in this 6Nations goes. I can think of lots of great lines and line breaks from him this championship. And a number of great passes and kicks too. So if we’re talking skill sets, do we have another 12 at his level? Not imo.

That said, I’d be happy to trial a Ford-Te’o-Joseph midfield, individually I rate them all, but I’m not convinced it’d be any better. My bet would be that it’d be worse tbh.
This seems to put you in in sync with the carpet majority of this board then (well, maybe "lots" is going too far).
We talk about Farrell a lot because he is the focus of a lot of talk. We have generally criticised him in the past, and more-or-less all of that was deserved.
I don't think there's a regular poster here who hasn't acknowledged his improved running lines, and his improved defensive discipline this season. I don't think there's anyone calling for him to be dropped further than the bench - and that only to try Ford/Cips alongside Te'o/Manu and Joseph/Daly and give them a fair crack at the whip, rather than Faz himself having to play 80 minutes of every match, so we never get to see what a backline without him can do.
There is a touch of hyperbole there I'd say!
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: What next?

Post by kk67 »

Fazlet can do all the shit. You feckers make yourselves look like jealous morons pretending you could do the same.
Banquo
Posts: 19130
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: What next?

Post by Banquo »

always tell when the sun is over the yardarm.
p/d
Posts: 3826
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: What next?

Post by p/d »

In light of the time lapse between reliving the 9th and 10th minute I had assumed Diggers had been busy at the drinks cabinet
Banquo
Posts: 19130
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: What next?

Post by Banquo »

p/d wrote:In light of the time lapse between reliving the 9th and 10th minute I had assumed Diggers had been busy at the drinks cabinet
Him and kk gorging on Snowball, Sherry and Buckfast.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: What next?

Post by WaspInWales »

Moonshine I reckon
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6369
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: What next?

Post by Oakboy »

I have several Irish, Sottish and Welsh friends whom I regard as good rugby judges. None rate Farrell and would not select him for their countries should he have a 'nationality transfer'. All, however, rate Ford. Some, like me, believe Cipriani is England's most gifted FH.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1984
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: What next?

Post by Spiffy »

Which Tyler wrote:
Timbo wrote: I guess I’d say that I disagree with your premise, at least as far as his running in this 6Nations goes. I can think of lots of great lines and line breaks from him this championship. And a number of great passes and kicks too. So if we’re talking skill sets, do we have another 12 at his level? Not imo.

That said, I’d be happy to trial a Ford-Te’o-Joseph midfield, individually I rate them all, but I’m not convinced it’d be any better. My bet would be that it’d be worse tbh.
This seems to put you in in sync with the carpet majority of this board then (well, maybe "lots" is going too far).
We talk about Farrell a lot because he is the focus of a lot of talk. We have generally criticised him in the past, and more-or-less all of that was deserved.
I don't think there's a regular poster here who hasn't acknowledged his improved running lines, and his improved defensive discipline this season. I don't think there's anyone calling for him to be dropped further than the bench - and that only to try Ford/Cips alongside Te'o/Manu and Joseph/Daly and give them a fair crack at the whip, rather than Faz himself having to play 80 minutes of every match, so we never get to see what a backline without him can do.
Assume you mean by defensive discipline the non-creation of a dog leg, of which he has been guilty in the past. To be honest, I'm not sure he has shown much of an improvement in this respect at all. Just as important is the actual business of completing a tackle once you have put yourself in the position to make it, and he still misses more than you would expect from a top international midfielder.
Part of the England problem is that Eddie Jones does not seem to know whether he wants a dual playmaking axis at 10/12, or a playmaking 10 with a strong runner at 12. If the former, then Ford/Farrell does not seem the answer, since Ford will always be the poor relation even though he's the more skillful rugby player. I'd like to see Ford/Slade or Ford/ Loz. Slade is a good, clever, natural footballer with a handy left foot, but unfortunately he has not been playing much at 12 at club level, though I think he could switch quite easily.
(I do not think Ford should be an automatic choice either - by the time the RWC comes around, the best England FH might be Marcus Smith, a very talented lad, (or someone else)).
Post Reply