I honestly hate all the american style branding. So cheesy and un authentic. What the fuck has a bear got to do with bristol or what ever. Do they really think english crowds will suddenly decide to go and watch a game of rugby because of this?
twitchy wrote:I honestly hate all the american style branding. So cheesy and un authentic. What the fuck has a bear got to do with bristol or what ever. Do they really think english crowds will suddenly decide to go and watch a game of rugby because of this?
Bears used to roam Bristol TBF.
Still do looking at a google search just a different type of bear....
( I see a project has been set-up to re-introduce them to Bristol).
twitchy wrote:I honestly hate all the american style branding. So cheesy and un authentic. What the fuck has a bear got to do with bristol or what ever. Do they really think english crowds will suddenly decide to go and watch a game of rugby because of this?
Me too. It’s not American football!!!
The kit I’ve seen is nice though (minus the pointless bear on the chest).
twitchy wrote:I honestly hate all the american style branding. So cheesy and un authentic. What the fuck has a bear got to do with bristol or what ever. Do they really think english crowds will suddenly decide to go and watch a game of rugby because of this?
Bears used to roam Bristol TBF.
Still do looking at a google search just a different type of bear....
( I see a project has been set-up to re-introduce them to Bristol).
Next you will be telling me there are sharks in manchester.
Kit looks ok, would prefer white to red in it though.
Some are outraged, though those people are still not over using letters, so its to be expected.
As said Bears is better than Shoguns and no-one will use it anyway (apart from those paid to do so & commentators). So personally am ambivalent about it & if we stay up it'll all be forgotten.
The Bears is the name of the wheelchair rugby side so could be a mix up.
jimKRFC wrote:Kit looks ok, would prefer white to red in it though.
Some are outraged, though those people are still not over using letters, so its to be expected.
As said Bears is better than Shoguns and no-one will use it anyway (apart from those paid to do so & commentators). So personally am ambivalent about it & if we stay up it'll all be forgotten.
The Bears is the name of the wheelchair rugby side so could be a mix up.
Pics? All I'm finding with google is the wheelchair rugby side and the gay bar.
jimKRFC wrote:Kit looks ok, would prefer white to red in it though.
Some are outraged, though those people are still not over using letters, so its to be expected.
As said Bears is better than Shoguns and no-one will use it anyway (apart from those paid to do so & commentators). So personally am ambivalent about it & if we stay up it'll all be forgotten.
The Bears is the name of the wheelchair rugby side so could be a mix up.
Pics? All I'm finding with google is the wheelchair rugby side and the gay bar.
3rd one down fits nicely. Also, as suggested by Elver Eater, is the rebranding to fit the new, American, league sponsor? So all non-branded sides get a new "name" for the US market?
Puja wrote:Oh good, an away kit that's practically indistinguishable from the home kit. That'll work great!
Puja
At least the away kit is decent, the home is not good. That said I had the same thought about two kits in a darker shade, albeit they must have a cup kit lying around somewhere, maybe something in white as a for instance