Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
fivepointer
Posts: 6341
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Post by fivepointer »

Sale Sharks: Haley; Brady, James, Leota, Edwards; Cipriani, Stringer; Harrison, Taylor, Cobilas, Evans, Ostrikov, Neild, Lund (capt), Ioane.

Replacements: Briggs, Lewis-Roberts, Mujati, Mills, Seymour, Mitchell, Ford, Jennings.

Montpellier: Mogg; Nagusa, Tuitavake, Steyn, Fall; Lucas, Paillaugue; Nariashvili, B du Plessis, J du Plessis, Willemse, Privat, Ouedraogo (capt), Liebenbery, Qera.

Replacements: Watremez, Kubriashvili, Watchou, Galletier, Wright, Ebersohn, Floch.
Guwuffle
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Post by Guwuffle »

TV coverage is on Sky Sports 3 for those like me that weren't sure where to watch.
16th man
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Post by 16th man »

Sale being out muscled, and lacking real quality.

Lacey's reffing of the breakdown is awful though. His definition of coming through the middle has been ridiculously loose for the French.
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

16th man wrote:Sale being out muscled, and lacking real quality.

Lacey's reffing of the breakdown is awful though. His definition of coming through the middle has been ridiculously loose for the French.
Lacey is the King of Clown Referees, a true leader of Irish refereeing. How the man makes a living from being utterly terrible at his job is beyond me.
Beasties
Posts: 1535
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Post by Beasties »

Epaminondas Pules wrote:
16th man wrote:Sale being out muscled, and lacking real quality.

Lacey's reffing of the breakdown is awful though. His definition of coming through the middle has been ridiculously loose for the French.
Lacey is the King of Clown Referees, a true leader of Irish refereeing. How the man makes a living from being utterly terrible at his job is beyond me.
This.
fivepointer
Posts: 6341
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Post by fivepointer »

Lacey gave his usual low level performance. Montpelier got away with all sorts at the breakdown without punishment.

They were the better side though and will take some beating in this competition.

Sale really lost it in the 3rd quarter, when they had possession and territory but couldnt score any points. James try, nicely teed up by Cipriani who was good throughout, was a highlight. Impressed again by the workrate of young Neild.
PPJ
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:48 pm
Location: Bath

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Post by PPJ »

Agree out muscled and lacked quality but Cips is playing really well and is better than the current England 10.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6608
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Post by Oakboy »

PPJ wrote:Agree out muscled and lacked quality but Cips is playing really well and is better than the current England 10.
Agreed. His hands are better than any other English 10.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11963
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Post by Mikey Brown »

Oakboy wrote:
PPJ wrote:Agree out muscled and lacked quality but Cips is playing really well and is better than the current England 10.
Agreed. His hands are better than any other English 10.
Really? He's got something above Ford, Burns, Slade?
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6608
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Sale V Montpelier Fri 7.45pm

Post by Oakboy »

Mikey Brown wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
PPJ wrote:Agree out muscled and lacked quality but Cips is playing really well and is better than the current England 10.
Agreed. His hands are better than any other English 10.
Really? He's got something above Ford, Burns, Slade?
I think so, yes. There is a greater creative element in his attacking prowess aided by the fastest hands. If he starts a lot of games for Wasps next season I think he'll move further ahead too.

Looking ahead I can see a case for picking Farrell ahead of him (not that I ever would) in terms of physicality and grind. Should Slade get Exeter's 10 shirt regularly, his game could produce the best balance of physicality and skill, IMO. I've always rated Ford ahead of Burns but until either Bath get their game in gear or he moves away from Dad, I can't see Ford making the expected progress. Some did not think that Ford played too badly in the 6N and he can't have done really as the FH in a GS-winning team. There is something missing though in terms of front-foot game management even allowing for playing with Youngs/Care.
Post Reply