I wouldn’t say Hartley is a loss. More that George isn’t as big a step up as hoped, but then he’s played a solid two years of rugby without a proper break.pandion wrote:I would agree but Hartley is proving more of a loss on the playing front than I thought he would.Mellsblue wrote:That is an issue, but if Hartley can be picked as capt despite being nowhere near good enough then you could make room for Launch. Personally, I’d start him even if all were fit but Jones sees it differently.pandion wrote: He's also unlikely to start once Kruitoje are back in form and that's an issue.
Second Test
Moderator: Puja
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Second Test
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Second Test
Captaining from wing or 15 is very tricky, especially with state of discipline in this mob. Maybe if he is playing 13. Has he any previous in captaincy?pandion wrote:Daly?
Launchbury or Itoje for me - might help calm Maro down.
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Second Test
Yes, I'd say so.pandion wrote:Guys who come across as good leaders also aren't getting picked. Is Shields that much better than Slater for example?
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Second Test
You think Kruis would be picked ahead of Launchbury and Lawes? Think he'd have to have a pretty dramatic return to form. Mind, if the lawes at 6 continues......pandion wrote:He's also unlikely to start once Kruitoje are back in form and that's an issue.Mellsblue wrote:That made me lol and, sadly, it’s also true.Mikey Brown wrote:I wouldn’t be against Launch, even with no idea if he’s really up to it, he’s just a really good player and not a cunt. What a high bar we’ve set.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Second Test
How different would the game have been if Motsert had got a yellow card and England awarded a penalty try, to bring it to 20-19 at 57 minutes in?
EDIT - And why wasn't Farrell next to him watching the replay?He didn't even mention the fact it was illegal play that knocked the ball out of Shields hands.
EDIT - And why wasn't Farrell next to him watching the replay?He didn't even mention the fact it was illegal play that knocked the ball out of Shields hands.
- Puja
- Posts: 17689
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Second Test
I'd be in favour of Itoje - for me the stupid play and penalties are frustration and trying to do too much to change the match on his own. Giving him a hand on the tiller could help with that.Banquo wrote:Captaining from wing or 15 is very tricky, especially with state of discipline in this mob. Maybe if he is playing 13. Has he any previous in captaincy?pandion wrote:Daly?
Launchbury or Itoje for me - might help calm Maro down.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: Second Test
Of course you then have the problem that Shields would be replacing Robshaw in the starting 15, and Robshaw isn't one of those exhibiting no leadership to start with. So you're no further ahead really. Unless you play Robshaw at 7.Banquo wrote:Yes, I'd say so.pandion wrote:Guys who come across as good leaders also aren't getting picked. Is Shields that much better than Slater for example?
I'll get me coat.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Second Test
Puja wrote:I'd be in favour of Itoje - for me the stupid play and penalties are frustration and trying to do too much to change the match on his own. Giving him a hand on the tiller could help with that.Banquo wrote:Captaining from wing or 15 is very tricky, especially with state of discipline in this mob. Maybe if he is playing 13. Has he any previous in captaincy?pandion wrote:Daly?
Launchbury or Itoje for me - might help calm Maro down.
Puja
I don't think Shouty MacShoutshout would be a wise choice for Capitan.
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: Second Test
*looks at the ruck marks* Am I being harsh to ask what the purpose of Sinckler is again?
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Second Test
He's the one we all wanted starting when we looked at Cole's ruck marks...Peat wrote:*looks at the ruck marks* Am I being harsh to ask what the purpose of Sinckler is again?
-
- Posts: 12142
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Second Test
Yeah I’m a massive fan but I can’t recall many consistent 80 minute performances from him. Fantastic option to have from the bench and that is how I’d use him.
I don’t know that Cole’s breakdown contributions were the main reason anybody wanted that swap made were they?
I don’t know that Cole’s breakdown contributions were the main reason anybody wanted that swap made were they?
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Second Test
Robshaw has unfortunately been shyte for the last two games. But the question was Shields v Slater, not Shields v Robshaw....Beasties wrote:Of course you then have the problem that Shields would be replacing Robshaw in the starting 15, and Robshaw isn't one of those exhibiting no leadership to start with. So you're no further ahead really. Unless you play Robshaw at 7.Banquo wrote:Yes, I'd say so.pandion wrote:Guys who come across as good leaders also aren't getting picked. Is Shields that much better than Slater for example?
I'll get me coat.
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Second Test
Partly, and that's because they have dropped off a cliff of late.Mikey Brown wrote:Yeah I’m a massive fan but I can’t recall many consistent 80 minute performances from him. Fantastic option to have from the bench and that is how I’d use him.
I don’t know that Cole’s breakdown contributions were the main reason anybody wanted that swap made were they?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Second Test
From what I remember we wanted a better carrier. Sinckler has been rank average this tour. For now, he’s definitely an impact replacement (what they used to call a finisher).Mikey Brown wrote:Yeah I’m a massive fan but I can’t recall many consistent 80 minute performances from him. Fantastic option to have from the bench and that is how I’d use him.
I don’t know that Cole’s breakdown contributions were the main reason anybody wanted that swap made were they?
- Puja
- Posts: 17689
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Second Test
When he's been captain for Sarries, England A, and England U20s, he's done a very good job with referee wrangling as well as decision-making. I think the shouting's the effect of Eddie's proclamations that he wants us to be nastier.morepork wrote:Puja wrote:I'd be in favour of Itoje - for me the stupid play and penalties are frustration and trying to do too much to change the match on his own. Giving him a hand on the tiller could help with that.Banquo wrote: Captaining from wing or 15 is very tricky, especially with state of discipline in this mob. Maybe if he is playing 13. Has he any previous in captaincy?
Launchbury or Itoje for me - might help calm Maro down.
Puja
I don't think Shouty MacShoutshout would be a wise choice for Capitan.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 5893
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Second Test
https://www.crashballrugby.com/articles/june-18th-2018
Some good stuff here with lots of video. Reviewing the performance but pointing to areas that need improvement.
Some good stuff here with lots of video. Reviewing the performance but pointing to areas that need improvement.
- Stom
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Second Test
I've only managed the beginning, but that physicality bit seems to be more about tackle technique...fivepointer wrote:https://www.crashballrugby.com/articles/june-18th-2018
Some good stuff here with lots of video. Reviewing the performance but pointing to areas that need improvement.
- richy678
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:01 pm
Re: Second Test
Ive just been watching the second test .
Ive just watched the first bok try.
Beast picks and goes through the middle of a ruck on about half way.
No guards or safteys, no one at home, makes 30/40m/
From the next ruck, England scrambling back.
A poor uncontrolled delivery (a chuck out the back to no one, bounces)
Vermulen picks up the loose ball unchallenged (ball is out so no offside)
He then runs past/through about 4 English players.
Very poor defence by England - ok they had been stressed before Beasts run, but defence had just dissolved.
I shouted at the telly - very very poor
Ive just watched the first bok try.
Beast picks and goes through the middle of a ruck on about half way.
No guards or safteys, no one at home, makes 30/40m/
From the next ruck, England scrambling back.
A poor uncontrolled delivery (a chuck out the back to no one, bounces)
Vermulen picks up the loose ball unchallenged (ball is out so no offside)
He then runs past/through about 4 English players.
Very poor defence by England - ok they had been stressed before Beasts run, but defence had just dissolved.
I shouted at the telly - very very poor
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Second Test
Farrell was at guard but decided it was more important to shove the nearby bok.
-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Second Test
I believe the shove was a reminder to the Boks that England were “trying to play rugby”Raggs wrote:Farrell was at guard but decided it was more important to shove the nearby bok.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Second Test
Was that the line he used after taking faf out slightly late and high?p/d wrote:I believe the shove was a reminder to the Boks that England were “trying to play rugby”Raggs wrote:Farrell was at guard but decided it was more important to shove the nearby bok.
-
- Posts: 2576
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: Second Test
I think it was (even more ironically) after the two minutes of handbags