Ruck marks for the 2nd test
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Ruck marks for the 2nd test
Ruck marks for those that are interested. The introduction of counting lineouts absolutely blew Itoje's score up massively, huge amount of work by the lock.
Shields non-try should have been a penalty try and a yellow to Motsert I reckon, 20-19 at around 59m, and a lock down, is a very different game indeed.
Shields non-try should have been a penalty try and a yellow to Motsert I reckon, 20-19 at around 59m, and a lock down, is a very different game indeed.
-
- Posts: 19131
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Ruck marks for the 2nd test
sorry for being dim, but what do the colour codes mean?Raggs wrote:Ruck marks for those that are interested. The introduction of counting lineouts absolutely blew Itoje's score up massively, huge amount of work by the lock.
Shields non-try should have been a penalty try and a yellow to Motsert I reckon, 20-19 at around 59m, and a lock down, is a very different game indeed.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Ruck marks for the 2nd test
It's bit across on the attacking rucks page, I should put it on the scores one.
- Stom
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Ruck marks for the 2nd test
Wait, Farrell didn't run a single metre ball in hand?
-
- Posts: 2990
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Re: Ruck marks for the 2nd test
Might not be the best place for this question but you lot know your stats. How does number of carries and metres carried work? If I take the ball a couple of steps then pass I presume I get neither but what if I make a break (or a half break) and then pass before contact?
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Ruck marks for the 2nd test
espn is gainline for meters, not sure about carries vs passes, or if you can carry and then pass. Kick returns obviously get plenty of free meters.
- Puja
- Posts: 17689
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Ruck marks for the 2nd test
Curry had a good game from that, as did Itoje. Nice work Raggs.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: Ruck marks for the 2nd test
Yeah, Curry showing how useful he was
How is he 20?!
How is he 20?!
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:25 pm
Re: Ruck marks for the 2nd test
Are there any stat sites that have a metres lost in the tackle or passive tackle etc?
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Ruck marks for the 2nd test
Not that I'm aware of.
-
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am
Re: Ruck marks for the 2nd test
Those front row numbers aren't great. Can really undo the balance of a forward pack if the front row isn't doing their primary job around the park. Vunipola and Sinckler are alright carrier's but not to the extent where the rest of the team is making up their missed rucks just so they can flop to the floor one metre behind the gainline.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Ruck marks for the 2nd test
Front row scores are always lower than everyone else. They look very low because all the numbers are lower, due to the nature of the game, but there's nothing particularly special about them in my mind. Starting front row know they've got 60 minutes to get through, they're massively built shortarses, and when a game is open and requires lots of running around, they often don't have much puff for anything else.
I do agree that it would be nice to see more from them, but they are good players, who can put in much better performances as starting individuals, which once again brings me to the hope that it's fatigue.
I do agree that it would be nice to see more from them, but they are good players, who can put in much better performances as starting individuals, which once again brings me to the hope that it's fatigue.