Saints v Quins

Moderator: Puja

twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by twitchy »

Scrumhead wrote:Unpopular as he may be, I thought Mallinder was good when he came on too.

I agree he did well. I don't think he's un popular. He is obviously highly skilled. It's just being either unable or unwilling to tackle when you are six four and 16 stone is unsustainable at the top level.

Especially when you see what tiny marcus smith was doing.

You never know, not having to be the headmaster's son might be really good for him.
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Timbo »

I think fb is Mallinders position, and he did play well last night, but he’ll have to improve under the high ball. Only caught about 1 from 6.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Mellsblue »

He was. Probably powered his magnificent, lionesque hair.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Scrumhead »

He is morphing in to Percy Montgomery
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12142
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Mikey Brown »

Tigersman wrote:
Adam_P wrote:We still have Kellaway and Naiyaravoro to come in the backs, which I think will help. I think this 9, 10, 12 combination could be very useful given some time together.
Naiyaravoro was quite rusty still in the A game, apparently dropped quite a few simple ones.
That’s kind of his thing.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9156
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Which Tyler »

twitchy wrote:How quick is smith.
Quick enough to catch a winger, running an extra 1-2 meters to get there.
Slow enough to be caught by a #8 who's running an extra 8-10 meters to get there.
Post Reply