Glasgow vs Saracens
Moderator: Puja
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Why is he paying 6, BTW?
-
- Posts: 12149
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Glasgow absolutely deserve to concede here. Fucking around in their own 22. Why?
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Mikey Brown wrote:Glasgow absolutely deserve to concede here. Fucking around in their own 22. Why?
When the inevitable box kick does come, it is very laboured and telegraphed. Give the oppo an age to get set.
-
- Posts: 12149
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
I'm sure Banquo will be enjoying Farrell's right-to-left passing here.
-
- Posts: 12149
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Oh NOW he's in touch. I see.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Great passage. Ref trying as hard as he can to limit opportunities...
-
- Posts: 12149
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
I guess we should just start playing anti-rugby and throwing the ball at their offside players on the floor.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
I don't understand the reluctance to draw and pass. Hail Mary chips every time.
-
- Posts: 12149
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Yup, they keep forgetting to actually commit any defenders.
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Billy got over the knee injury but has now gone off with yet another arm injury. Hopefully neither is serious otherwise it’s a massive problem for England.Renniks wrote:Mako subbed off with an injury (looked to be limping off and a heavily strapped foot)…
Billy caught under a player and looked to hyperextend his (heavily strapped) knee - I wouldn't be surprised to see him take some time out
-
- Posts: 12149
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Off his feet in the ruck. Classic. Fuck you Mr. Referee, whoever you are.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Oh for a supporting half back...
-
- Posts: 12149
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
I can't decide if I'm more frustrated by Saracens' general cuntiness or Glasgow's lack of composure in crucial moments.
Last edited by Mikey Brown on Sun Oct 14, 2018 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Farrell is in line for a penalty for persistent petulant pushing. Prick.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Ha. The ref farking hates Glasgow.
-
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:38 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
This is part of England’s massive penalty count problem - players acting like cunts at club level and getting away with it find that international refs are somewhat less impressed.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
I R Geech wrote:This is part of England’s massive penalty count problem - players acting like cunts at club level and getting away with it find that international refs are somewhat less impressed.
I would add the emphasis on spoiling tactics at the ruck to that.
-
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:38 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Yep, same thing. They don’t get pinged so never learn their lesson.morepork wrote:I R Geech wrote:This is part of England’s massive penalty count problem - players acting like cunts at club level and getting away with it find that international refs are somewhat less impressed.
I would add the emphasis on spoiling tactics at the ruck to that.
-
- Posts: 12149
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Jesus. Why did I put myself through that.
Should have been 3 - 6. Would have represented that game quite well.
Should have been 3 - 6. Would have represented that game quite well.
-
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Mikey Brown wrote:Jesus. Why did I put myself through that.
Should have been 3 - 6. Would have represented that game quite well.
We should have watched the newcastle game by the look of it.
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
An away win is an away win, but that was a dog of a game and a performance from Sarries that got far too caught up in causing niggle and confrontation.
Given the attrition rate we're seeing so far, the English clubs going out in the groups might be better for the world cup.
Given the attrition rate we're seeing so far, the English clubs going out in the groups might be better for the world cup.
-
- Posts: 12149
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
To me that was the greatest argument for "letting the play go on / letting the game flow" (in the form of not penalising anything in the rucks for the first hour) not working. It doesn't create an open, flowing game, it just creates a fucking mess.16th man wrote:An away win is an away win, but that was a dog of a game and a performance from Sarries that got far too caught up in causing niggle and confrontation.
Given the attrition rate we're seeing so far, the English clubs going out in the groups might be better for the world cup.
You can't blame Saracens for what they did. They were allowed to. As someone else said it won't/shouldn't work at the top level though.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Yes, most of his loose, floaty passes went that way but there was also one the other way. I think BOD is an all-time great but he described Farrell as one of the world's best FHs. Odd.Mikey Brown wrote:I'm sure Banquo will be enjoying Farrell's right-to-left passing here.
-
- Posts: 5895
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Horrible, niggly, poorly controlled game of very little merit. Saracens ground out a valuable win and were worth it, but goodness that wasnt much fun to watch.
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Glasgow vs Saracens
Yeah - exactly what I thought.twitchy wrote:Mikey Brown wrote:Jesus. Why did I put myself through that.
Should have been 3 - 6. Would have represented that game quite well.
We should have watched the newcastle game by the look of it.
Terrible game and serious bad news for England with Mako, Billy and Isiekwe all picking up injuries.
Last edited by Scrumhead on Sun Oct 14, 2018 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.