Cipriani clearly not guilty
Moderator: Puja
- Spiffy
- Posts: 2197
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Cipriani clearly not guilty
Whatever the legal niceties, it does look as though Danny had a fair bit to sup. Strange that his minders/mates would let him drive himeslf if he were glazed and slurring. Maybe he has none. Or maybe they had had a skinful too.
-
- Posts: 11963
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Cipriani clearly not guilty
Why do people say sup? It just sounds weird. It makes me cringe whenever I read the beer thread on here.
Sorry to aim that at you, Spiff. You're not the main culprit.
Oh, Cipriani? Yeah, a good player (not that good anyway) but drink driving is a shitty, shitty thing to do.
Sorry to aim that at you, Spiff. You're not the main culprit.
Oh, Cipriani? Yeah, a good player (not that good anyway) but drink driving is a shitty, shitty thing to do.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 2197
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Cipriani clearly not guilty
Eehhh ooopp lad - hast thee never 'ad owt tae sooop?Mikey Brown wrote:Why do people say sup? It just sounds weird. It makes me cringe whenever I read the beer thread on here.
Sorry to aim that at you, Spiff. You're not the main culprit.
Oh, Cipriani? Yeah, a good player (not that good anyway) but drink driving is a shitty, shitty thing to do.
-
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:46 am
Re: Cipriani clearly not guilty
The words sound like police boilerplate ("his speech was slurred, his eyes were glazed, he was drunk...."). But he seems way over the limit; not just a couple..,Spiffy wrote:Whatever the legal niceties, it does look as though Danny had a fair bit to sup. Strange that his minders/mates would let him drive himeslf if he were glazed and slurring. Maybe he has none. Or maybe they had had a skinful too.
wrt "sup" time for some grammar-school-boy-punk?