Cipriani clearly not guilty

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2197
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Cipriani clearly not guilty

Post by Spiffy »

Whatever the legal niceties, it does look as though Danny had a fair bit to sup. Strange that his minders/mates would let him drive himeslf if he were glazed and slurring. Maybe he has none. Or maybe they had had a skinful too.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11963
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Cipriani clearly not guilty

Post by Mikey Brown »

Why do people say sup? It just sounds weird. It makes me cringe whenever I read the beer thread on here.

Sorry to aim that at you, Spiff. You're not the main culprit.

Oh, Cipriani? Yeah, a good player (not that good anyway) but drink driving is a shitty, shitty thing to do.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2197
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Cipriani clearly not guilty

Post by Spiffy »

Mikey Brown wrote:Why do people say sup? It just sounds weird. It makes me cringe whenever I read the beer thread on here.

Sorry to aim that at you, Spiff. You're not the main culprit.

Oh, Cipriani? Yeah, a good player (not that good anyway) but drink driving is a shitty, shitty thing to do.
Eehhh ooopp lad - hast thee never 'ad owt tae sooop?
WaspInWales
Posts: 4503
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cipriani clearly not guilty

Post by WaspInWales »

Image
loudnconfident
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:46 am

Re: Cipriani clearly not guilty

Post by loudnconfident »

Spiffy wrote:Whatever the legal niceties, it does look as though Danny had a fair bit to sup. Strange that his minders/mates would let him drive himeslf if he were glazed and slurring. Maybe he has none. Or maybe they had had a skinful too.
The words sound like police boilerplate ("his speech was slurred, his eyes were glazed, he was drunk...."). But he seems way over the limit; not just a couple..,

wrt "sup" time for some grammar-school-boy-punk?
Post Reply