Yep. I thought he played pretty well against NZ. That said, he’s not shown form worthy of a Eng shirt since he move to Eng.TheDasher wrote:Can't argue with that.Mikey Brown wrote:Exactly this. Hard-nosed, lineout jumping 6 who can keep up with the pace of S14 and is a known leader sounds great. But I don’t know how anyone could claim to have seen that since he’s been in England.Scrumhead wrote:I’m yet to see anything to suggest Shields is any better than Robshaw or Wilson either. The fact that I’d prefer Lawes at 6 speaks volumes.
Nz game was his best so far though, he did cover a lot of ground and was physical.
Team for Australia
Moderator: Puja
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team for Australia
Last edited by Mellsblue on Sat Nov 24, 2018 11:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team for Australia
Ha! Should’ve had a ‘not’ in there. Now edited.Mikey Brown wrote:He has?
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Team for Australia
You are Banquo and I claim my €5Mellsblue wrote:Ha! Should’ve had a ‘not’ in there. Now edited.Mikey Brown wrote:He has?
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team for Australia
The trouble is, Dash, we don't want an 'honest trier'. We've got loads of proper English versions of that. Covering ground and getting stuck in is pretty meaningless if he is off the pace even by a metre. So far, IMO, he simply does not affect the game, even collectively. I have yet to see him make one single decisive tackle - of Worsley significance, shall we say. Over thirty yards, he must be at least five yards slower than Moody.TheDasher wrote:Can't argue with that.Mikey Brown wrote:Exactly this. Hard-nosed, lineout jumping 6 who can keep up with the pace of S14 and is a known leader sounds great. But I don’t know how anyone could claim to have seen that since he’s been in England.Scrumhead wrote:I’m yet to see anything to suggest Shields is any better than Robshaw or Wilson either. The fact that I’d prefer Lawes at 6 speaks volumes.
Nz game was his best so far though, he did cover a lot of ground and was physical.
Today, against this Aussie side, if he's any good, Shields ought to be a real destructive nuisance. That's his job. We'll see.
-
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:42 pm
Re: Team for Australia
If anyone finds a good stream let me know
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team for Australia
Will I be told I’m too negative if I point how s**t Youngs’ pass was to May?
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Team for Australia
2 min..?
backward scrum shuffle ineffective for Aus
May in..try 15
7- 0 after 4 min.
backward scrum shuffle ineffective for Aus
May in..try 15
7- 0 after 4 min.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Team for Australia
Eng on track with pens..
7 - 3 after 7 min..To'ouma.
7 - 3 after 7 min..To'ouma.
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm
Re: Team for Australia
Actually thought May had over-run it, rather than the pass being poor.Mellsblue wrote:Will I be told I’m too negative if I point how s**t Youngs’ pass was to May?
The standard idiotic Itoje penalty. But apparently you can tackle a tackler now? Anyone else see them upend Moon to stop it turning into a maul?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Team for Australia
He didn't make it easy for him, but it wasn't terribleMellsblue wrote:Will I be told I’m too negative if I point how s**t Youngs’ pass was to May?
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm
Re: Team for Australia
How was that legal from the Ozzy 2? Diving off his feet into the 9 from behind the back foot?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Team for Australia
Could be, my stream cut me off from any replays to checkPeej wrote:Actually thought May had over-run it, rather than the pass being poor.Mellsblue wrote:Will I be told I’m too negative if I point how s**t Youngs’ pass was to May?
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Team for Australia
Typical. I knew we'd be quick but my stream died on kick off... I've missed around 75% of England tries this autumn 

-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Team for Australia
Someone-esque pass there from Genia.
-
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:58 am
Re: Team for Australia
Yes!Mellsblue wrote:Will I be told I’m too negative if I point how s**t Youngs’ pass was to May?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team for Australia
Our best 9 chucks a five yard pass at his target’s hips. If May is too flat I’ll change my mind, if he’s not it’s a s**t pass.Which Tyler wrote:He didn't make it easy for him, but it wasn't terribleMellsblue wrote:Will I be told I’m too negative if I point how s**t Youngs’ pass was to May?
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Team for Australia
Bad miss Faz, 12 min.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team for Australia
Ha. Brilliant bit of motivation from Farrell 15 phases earlier to set it all up, though.TheDasher wrote:Yes!Mellsblue wrote:Will I be told I’m too negative if I point how s**t Youngs’ pass was to May?

- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team for Australia
You negative, echo chamber dweller, you.Galfon wrote:Bad miss Faz, 12 min.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Team for Australia
Pen Faz!..10-3, 14 mins..he was only kidding.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Team for Australia
Uncharacteristc.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Team for Australia
"normal service resumed"
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm
Re: Team for Australia
Great hit and turn over from Shields.
Slade looking really good
Slade looking really good