Team for Australia
Moderator: Puja
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Team for Australia
HT 13 - 13
Illegal challenge by Faz..surely..
Eng ok up front but lacking lustre in attacking ideas
Aus tails will be up..
Illegal challenge by Faz..surely..
Eng ok up front but lacking lustre in attacking ideas
Aus tails will be up..
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm
Re: Team for Australia
I mean it's not, as it hasn't been given, but it should be
-
- Posts: 2302
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Team for Australia
Why isn't that a penalty try exactly?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Team for Australia
ComfortablyPeej wrote:That's a penalty try
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team for Australia
Hooper saying it’s a shoulder charge. Peyper replies the carrier dropped his shoulder.....which he’s allowed to.
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Team for Australia
Should be pen try at least...
And the explanation from Peyper is bull
And the explanation from Peyper is bull
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Team for Australia
Shocking tackle attempt by Farrell.
It must be bad if Barnes is questioning it.
It must be bad if Barnes is questioning it.
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Team for Australia
OK, so for us to be level there... Is embarrassing. Aus were atrocious.
And I'm really sorry Dasher and Rich, but it's Farrell who needs to shoulder most of the blame
And I'm really sorry Dasher and Rich, but it's Farrell who needs to shoulder most of the blame
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Team for Australia
There is no Farrell mafia.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Team for Australia
Stone cold pen try and yellow.
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Team for Australia
He’s never going to learn until he starts getting penalised.
Should have been a penalty try and a yellow and we should be going in behind on the scoreboard.
Should have been a penalty try and a yellow and we should be going in behind on the scoreboard.
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Team for Australia
Daly shocking again too.
- Shiny
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
- Location: Bradford
Re: Team for Australia
One day the Fazgit tackle technique is going to cost us a big game.
The green, black and gold army.
-
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 am
Re: Team for Australia
Can see the ratings now
Farrell: heroic defence that stopped a sure try 10/10
Farrell: heroic defence that stopped a sure try 10/10
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Team for Australia
Aussies have been crap.
It's laughable.
How can this be so with one of the best players in the world on the pitch? An inspirational leader, who galvanises all around him. His mere presence wins games and he doesn't miss kicks...or tackles.
This cannot be so.
If we can't beat this Aussie team, then we're in real trouble.
It's laughable.
How can this be so with one of the best players in the world on the pitch? An inspirational leader, who galvanises all around him. His mere presence wins games and he doesn't miss kicks...or tackles.
This cannot be so.
If we can't beat this Aussie team, then we're in real trouble.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team for Australia
Fark me. “Where’s the leader in the forward pack?” This time last week it was all Ford’s fault.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Team for Australia
Will I get told off if I suggest that Farrell is responsible for 14 or Australia's 13 points?
(That call from Pepper was utterly absurd)
(That call from Pepper was utterly absurd)
-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team for Australia
Both props going well. Wilson tidy. Slade looking sharper. That's all I have
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team for Australia
It's going to be interesting to see how early replacements are made and who they are. I really do not want to see Farrell at 12.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team for Australia
It’s affecting his decision making, too.Scrumhead wrote:Daly shocking again too.
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Team for Australia
I think Slade has been a mixed bag.p/d wrote:Both props going well. Wilson tidy. Slade looking sharper. That's all I have
The pack have been good. The backs have been crap. Which kind of hints that, just maybe, the problem may be somewhere between 8 and 11...I wonder...
Maybe both?
-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team for Australia
As long as Shields stays on then we have every chance of taking the spoilsOakboy wrote:It's going to be interesting to see how early replacements are made and who they are. I really do not want to see Farrell at 12.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Team for Australia
Slade... This match feels similar the Saffer one - probably his best in an England shirt, but I'm still not sure it amounts to "good"
Am I just judging him too harshly because I had such high hopes for him (and feel he's out of position)?
Am I just judging him too harshly because I had such high hopes for him (and feel he's out of position)?
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team for Australia
To be fair he is up with the play some of the time so there is a marginal improvement. I'd still bring Hughes on in his place though.p/d wrote:As long as Shields stays on then we have every chance of taking the spoilsOakboy wrote:It's going to be interesting to see how early replacements are made and who they are. I really do not want to see Farrell at 12.
-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team for Australia
YesWhich Tyler wrote:Slade... This match feels similar the Saffer one - probably his best in an England shirt, but I'm still not sure it amounts to "good"
Am I just judging him too harshly because I had such high hopes for him (and feel he's out of position)?