Team for Australia

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Galfon »

HT 13 - 13
Illegal challenge by Faz..surely..
Eng ok up front but lacking lustre in attacking ideas
Aus tails will be up..
Peej
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Peej »

I mean it's not, as it hasn't been given, but it should be
switchskier
Posts: 2302
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm

Re: Team for Australia

Post by switchskier »

Why isn't that a penalty try exactly?
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9178
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Which Tyler »

Peej wrote:That's a penalty try
Comfortably
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Mellsblue »

Hooper saying it’s a shoulder charge. Peyper replies the carrier dropped his shoulder.....which he’s allowed to.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Stom »

Should be pen try at least...

And the explanation from Peyper is bull
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Team for Australia

Post by WaspInWales »

Shocking tackle attempt by Farrell.

It must be bad if Barnes is questioning it.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Stom »

OK, so for us to be level there... Is embarrassing. Aus were atrocious.

And I'm really sorry Dasher and Rich, but it's Farrell who needs to shoulder most of the blame
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Team for Australia

Post by WaspInWales »

There is no Farrell mafia.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Raggs »

Stone cold pen try and yellow.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Scrumhead »

He’s never going to learn until he starts getting penalised.

Should have been a penalty try and a yellow and we should be going in behind on the scoreboard.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Scrumhead »

Daly shocking again too.
User avatar
Shiny
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
Location: Bradford

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Shiny »

One day the Fazgit tackle technique is going to cost us a big game.
The green, black and gold army.
Tigersman
Posts: 1540
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Tigersman »

Can see the ratings now
Farrell: heroic defence that stopped a sure try 10/10
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Team for Australia

Post by WaspInWales »

Aussies have been crap.

It's laughable.

How can this be so with one of the best players in the world on the pitch? An inspirational leader, who galvanises all around him. His mere presence wins games and he doesn't miss kicks...or tackles.

This cannot be so.

If we can't beat this Aussie team, then we're in real trouble.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Mellsblue »

Fark me. “Where’s the leader in the forward pack?” This time last week it was all Ford’s fault.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9178
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Which Tyler »

Will I get told off if I suggest that Farrell is responsible for 14 or Australia's 13 points?

(That call from Pepper was utterly absurd)
p/d
Posts: 3826
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Team for Australia

Post by p/d »

Both props going well. Wilson tidy. Slade looking sharper. That's all I have
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6373
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Oakboy »

It's going to be interesting to see how early replacements are made and who they are. I really do not want to see Farrell at 12.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Mellsblue »

Scrumhead wrote:Daly shocking again too.
It’s affecting his decision making, too.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Stom »

p/d wrote:Both props going well. Wilson tidy. Slade looking sharper. That's all I have
I think Slade has been a mixed bag.

The pack have been good. The backs have been crap. Which kind of hints that, just maybe, the problem may be somewhere between 8 and 11...I wonder...

Maybe both?
p/d
Posts: 3826
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Team for Australia

Post by p/d »

Oakboy wrote:It's going to be interesting to see how early replacements are made and who they are. I really do not want to see Farrell at 12.
As long as Shields stays on then we have every chance of taking the spoils
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9178
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Which Tyler »

Slade... This match feels similar the Saffer one - probably his best in an England shirt, but I'm still not sure it amounts to "good"

Am I just judging him too harshly because I had such high hopes for him (and feel he's out of position)?
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6373
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Team for Australia

Post by Oakboy »

p/d wrote:
Oakboy wrote:It's going to be interesting to see how early replacements are made and who they are. I really do not want to see Farrell at 12.
As long as Shields stays on then we have every chance of taking the spoils
To be fair he is up with the play some of the time so there is a marginal improvement. I'd still bring Hughes on in his place though.
p/d
Posts: 3826
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Team for Australia

Post by p/d »

Which Tyler wrote:Slade... This match feels similar the Saffer one - probably his best in an England shirt, but I'm still not sure it amounts to "good"

Am I just judging him too harshly because I had such high hopes for him (and feel he's out of position)?
Yes
Post Reply