Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Rich
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:18 am

Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Rich »

Chris Foy in the Daily Mail predicts the following 31:


My only doubt is the need for another specialist half back at the expense of a center (Slade):


World Cup squad of 31 (possible): Brown, Cokanasiga, Daly, May, Watson; Te’o, Tuilagi, Joseph, Slade; Farrell, Ford; Youngs, Care; Genge, Moon, Mako Vunipola, Cole, Sinckler, Williams, Cowan-Dickie, George, Hartley, Itoje, Kruis, Launchbury, Lawes, Shields/Robshaw, Curry, Underhill, Billy Vunipola, Hughes.

Predicted stand-by players: Chris Ashton, Jack Nowell, Alex Lozowski, Danny Cipriani, Dan Robson, Ben Spencer, Alec Hepburn, Tom Dunn, Charlie Ewels, Nick Isiekwe, Sam Simmonds, Mark Wilson.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugby ... hs-go.html
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12150
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Mikey Brown »

If Wilson loses out to Shields I’m not watching.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Mellsblue »

Mikey Brown wrote:If Wilson loses out to Shields I’m not watching.
This.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Galfon »

If JR was still an 80 min. man, it may be 3 SH's and 2 hookers.Eng desperately need something from a 9.
Peat
Posts: 448
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Peat »

Galfon wrote:If JR was still an 80 min. man, it may be 3 SH's and 2 hookers.Eng desperately need something from a 9.
Going with only 2 hookers would be very risky imo. So's only two scrum-halves mind...
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1986
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Spiffy »

Mikey Brown wrote:If Wilson loses out to Shields I’m not watching.
Never mind Shields - Wilson should be in ahead of Hughes, who has had plenty of chances nowand remains unimpressive.
Peej
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Peej »

Keeping his options open by not specifying which Curry I see!
fivepointer
Posts: 5895
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by fivepointer »

very similar conclusions here - https://www.rugbypass.com/news/ten-mont ... -rwc-squad

Forwards (17)

Mako Vunipola, Ben Moon, Ellis Genge, Jamie George, Dylan Hartley, Luke Cowan-Dickie, Kyle Sinckler, Harry Williams; Maro Itoje, George Kruis, Courtney Lawes, Joe Launchbury; Chris Robshaw, Mark Wilson, Sam Underhill, Billy Vunipola, Nathan Hughes.

Backs (14)

Ben Youngs, Danny Care, Richard Wigglesworth, Owen Farrell, George Ford; Ben Te’o, Henry Slade, Manu Tuilagi, Jonathan Joseph; Jonny May, Elliot Daly, Anthony Watson, Jack Nowell, Joe Cokanasiga.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by morepork »

fivepointer wrote:very similar conclusions here - https://www.rugbypass.com/news/ten-mont ... -rwc-squad

Forwards (17)

Mako Vunipola, Ben Moon, Ellis Genge, Jamie George, Dylan Hartley, Luke Cowan-Dickie, Kyle Sinckler, Harry Williams; Maro Itoje, George Kruis, Courtney Lawes, Joe Launchbury; Chris Robshaw, Mark Wilson, Sam Underhill, Billy Vunipola, Nathan Hughes.

Backs (14)

Ben Youngs, Danny Care, Richard Wigglesworth, Owen Farrell, George Ford; Ben Te’o, Henry Slade, Manu Tuilagi, Jonathan Joseph; Jonny May, Elliot Daly, Anthony Watson, Jack Nowell, Joe Cokanasiga.

"For example, Itoje and Lawes both also cover six, potentially allowing the Australian to go a bit lighter in the back row..."

Not a great idea that.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Scrumhead »

Neither squad includes Cole. Is the general assumption that he’s permanently out of favour?

Sinckler’s made a decent case to be first choice, but has Williams done anything to justify being ahead of Cole? Granted Cole isn’t anywhere near as good as he once was but he’s no worse than Williams IMO and has at least shown that he is capable of more.

Admittedly Cole’s most notable impact in recent times has been giving away penalties, but at least he’s trying to get involved rather than watching mauls from first receiver as Williams did in the summer.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6373
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Oakboy »

Anybody know what the standby/injury replacement rules will be? The squad looks like containing a lot of players that I would consider injury-prone.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17693
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Puja »

morepork wrote: "For example, Itoje and Lawes both also cover six, potentially allowing the Australian to go a bit lighter in the back row..."

Not a great idea that.
Against decent teams no, but for things like the 4-day cross-country turnaround in the pool to play the USA, we can rest a back row and bring in one of our 5.5s.
Scrumhead wrote:Neither squad includes Cole. Is the general assumption that he’s permanently out of favour?

Sinckler’s made a decent case to be first choice, but has Williams done anything to justify being ahead of Cole? Granted Cole isn’t anywhere near as good as he once was but he’s no worse than Williams IMO and has at least shown that he is capable of more.

Admittedly Cole’s most notable impact in recent times has been giving away penalties, but at least he’s trying to get involved rather than watching mauls from first receiver as Williams did in the summer.
Cole has been doing his best to get out of contention with the way he's playing for Leicester. Williams was rubbish in the autumn as well, so it's more a game of least worst rather than best.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Mellsblue »

Edit: in response to Dors’ question.

Same as usual I’d suspect. You can only make permanent injury replacements.

You’d struggle in some positions to get a good standard of player if you didn’t pick injury prone players.
For example, I’d consider all of Kruis, Launch and Lawes injury prone. Similarly, you’ve got both Te’o and Tuilagi in the centres which leaves you with no ‘bosh’ option if you dont select them, and you could possibly add Joseph now that he’s been out for so long.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Mellsblue »

Puja wrote:
morepork wrote: "For example, Itoje and Lawes both also cover six, potentially allowing the Australian to go a bit lighter in the back row..."

Not a great idea that.
Against decent teams no, but for things like the 4-day cross-country turnaround in the pool to play the USA, we can rest a back row and bring in one of our 5.5s.
Scrumhead wrote:Neither squad includes Cole. Is the general assumption that he’s permanently out of favour?

Sinckler’s made a decent case to be first choice, but has Williams done anything to justify being ahead of Cole? Granted Cole isn’t anywhere near as good as he once was but he’s no worse than Williams IMO and has at least shown that he is capable of more.

Admittedly Cole’s most notable impact in recent times has been giving away penalties, but at least he’s trying to get involved rather than watching mauls from first receiver as Williams did in the summer.
Cole has been doing his best to get out of contention with the way he's playing for Leicester. Williams was rubbish in the autumn as well, so it's more a game of least worst rather than best.

Puja
Yep. Lawtoje is ok against tier 2/3, you’d hope.

If we lose Sinckler it’s a really big drop off in quality, it’s also a big change in ‘style’ of player. We really don’t have any other carrying tight heads, other than Thomas.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Scrumhead »

I’d have had Thomas ahead of Williams anyway. I think he’s a very good player who could definitely have been more established but for his injury record. If he can stay injury free, we shouldn’t ignore him IMO.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6373
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Daily Mail's England World Cup Squad

Post by Oakboy »

Mellsblue wrote:Edit: in response to Dors’ question.

Same as usual I’d suspect. You can only make permanent injury replacements.

You’d struggle in some positions to get a good standard of player if you didn’t pick injury prone players.
For example, I’d consider all of Kruis, Launch and Lawes injury prone. Similarly, you’ve got both Te’o and Tuilagi in the centres which leaves you with no ‘bosh’ option if you dont select them, and you could possibly add Joseph now that he’s been out for so long.
Maybe Hartley and Watson are so afflicted. Plus, Underhill definitely is. Then, there are LCD and Taylor, not forgetting Billy V and Hughes.

It is odd, too, that Robshaw, who I would consider the least prone is out too. Mind you, I'd replace him with Armand who rarely misses a game.

If I was being unkind for a change ;) , I'd wish injuries on a few but the most advantageous absence would be Jones so I'll just 'grin and bear it'.
Post Reply