England squad for start of 6N’s

Moderator: Puja

Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Digby »

It's not like Ireland asked many questions of Manu or our defence in general
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:It's not like Ireland asked many questions of Manu or our defence in general
.....your snowball is half drunk this morning. The key word was yesterday.



(I know you like an edit)
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Digby »

Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:It's not like Ireland asked many questions of Manu or our defence in general
.....your snowball is half drunk this morning. The key word was yesterday.



(I know you like an edit)
Ireland never really show much in open play for me absent of the opposition dropping lots of Murray's kicks but they have run some really well executed strike moves against us in the recent past, but we got nothing from them yesterday bar say some individual questions posed by such as Stockdale
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:It's not like Ireland asked many questions of Manu or our defence in general
.....your snowball is half drunk this morning. The key word was yesterday.



(I know you like an edit)
Ireland never really show much in open play for me absent of the opposition dropping lots of Murray's kicks but they have run some really well executed strike moves against us in the recent past, but we got nothing from them yesterday bar say some individual questions posed by such as Stockdale
Cause and effect, perchance. But I don't see the point in downplaying a good defensive effort because the other team didn't trouble us in attack :lol:

In open play, Ireland tend to dominate the gainline as their method, and couldn't yesterday.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Mellsblue »

I wonder if having an IC who is not an IC reined in Farrell a little bit. He might’ve been less inclined to hare out of the line if he knew Tuilagi might need some help positionally.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Stom »

Mellsblue wrote:I wonder if having an IC who is not an IC reined in Farrell a little bit. He might’ve been less inclined to hare out of the line if he knew Tuilagi might need some help positionally.
Which still requires a refreshing and overdue maturity from him.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Banquo »

Stom wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:I wonder if having an IC who is not an IC reined in Farrell a little bit. He might’ve been less inclined to hare out of the line if he knew Tuilagi might need some help positionally.
Which still requires a refreshing and overdue maturity from him.
I'd give coaches some credit here. Plan and roles looked well thought through to me.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6373
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Oakboy »

Mellsblue wrote:I wonder if having an IC who is not an IC reined in Farrell a little bit. He might’ve been less inclined to hare out of the line if he knew Tuilagi might need some help positionally.
I've seen/heard some pundits suggesting that Farrell in his redesigned FH role is now running things well in terms of verbal instructions/leadership etc. Maybe they are right and it's a big part of the thinking. I'd guess you'd have to be on the touchline to know. I see nothing on TV to argue against it.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:I wonder if having an IC who is not an IC reined in Farrell a little bit. He might’ve been less inclined to hare out of the line if he knew Tuilagi might need some help positionally.
I've seen/heard some pundits suggesting that Farrell in his redesigned FH role is now running things well in terms of verbal instructions/leadership etc. Maybe they are right and it's a big part of the thinking. I'd guess you'd have to be on the touchline to know. I see nothing on TV to argue against it.
Plenty wrong with the communication tween Faz and Youngs.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Stom »

Banquo wrote:
Stom wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:I wonder if having an IC who is not an IC reined in Farrell a little bit. He might’ve been less inclined to hare out of the line if he knew Tuilagi might need some help positionally.
Which still requires a refreshing and overdue maturity from him.
I'd give coaches some credit here. Plan and roles looked well thought through to me.
Absolutely. Just Farrell has previous for seemingly veering off course in defence.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6373
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:I wonder if having an IC who is not an IC reined in Farrell a little bit. He might’ve been less inclined to hare out of the line if he knew Tuilagi might need some help positionally.
I've seen/heard some pundits suggesting that Farrell in his redesigned FH role is now running things well in terms of verbal instructions/leadership etc. Maybe they are right and it's a big part of the thinking. I'd guess you'd have to be on the touchline to know. I see nothing on TV to argue against it.
Plenty wrong with the communication tween Faz and Youngs.
True but most would suggest that is down to Youngs. As an aside, Youngs, Ford, Tuilagi and May all play together for Leicester where the backline (acceptedly with less than perfect ball from their forwards) does not exactly look slick. I think Youngs inflicts ceiling limitations and was disappointed that Robson got no game time. Why replace Care and then leave Youngs on? Care rarely sat the game out.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Raggs »

Definitely thought after the intercept that Robson would be on. Great first cap. Still a bit of time to actually run around.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17693
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Puja »

Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Epaminondas Pules wrote:
They did look pretty ropey. Scotland played well mind, but Italy look a long way off the other teams.
I thought Scotland were very patchy too.
After just the one round of games, the only non-patchy performance was ours. Compared with most of our wins under Jones, yesterday's performance stood out for a cracking start that was maintained over 80 minutes. Preparation was spot-on. I've hardly ever (if at all) said that about us since Jones took over.

It makes me wonder if Mitchell has made a big difference. I'm no expert on defence but was it fair to suggest that Tuilagi was well-coached? He has not looked that reliable defensively in any of the Leicester games that I have seen. Often, he can be a loose cannon, just as Farrell used to be at 12 before Mitchell's appointment.
I think Mitchell's helped as an assistant and a dilution of Jones as much as anything else. You can't deny we've had a fresh impetus since he joined, not just in defence, but in overall intensity.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
I've seen/heard some pundits suggesting that Farrell in his redesigned FH role is now running things well in terms of verbal instructions/leadership etc. Maybe they are right and it's a big part of the thinking. I'd guess you'd have to be on the touchline to know. I see nothing on TV to argue against it.
Plenty wrong with the communication tween Faz and Youngs.
True but most would suggest that is down to Youngs. As an aside, Youngs, Ford, Tuilagi and May all play together for Leicester where the backline (acceptedly with less than perfect ball from their forwards) does not exactly look slick. I think Youngs inflicts ceiling limitations and was disappointed that Robson got no game time. Why replace Care and then leave Youngs on? Care rarely sat the game out.
Eh? He clearly was struggling to find Faz in the first half, and that's down to Faz.
Dubai7
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:23 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Dubai7 »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Btw if any of you is feeling confident get some money on. Ireland are bizarrely massive favourites on the Betfair betting exchange. England are 3/1.
Yep! the £20 return on a £5 stake paid for my round last night! And I got 10/1 for a grand slam from Betfair.
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3406
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote: Plenty wrong with the communication tween Faz and Youngs.
True but most would suggest that is down to Youngs. As an aside, Youngs, Ford, Tuilagi and May all play together for Leicester where the backline (acceptedly with less than perfect ball from their forwards) does not exactly look slick. I think Youngs inflicts ceiling limitations and was disappointed that Robson got no game time. Why replace Care and then leave Youngs on? Care rarely sat the game out.
Eh? He clearly was struggling to find Faz in the first half, and that's down to Faz.
And fat lads being stood in the way at times.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12150
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Mikey Brown »

Raggs wrote:Definitely thought after the intercept that Robson would be on. Great first cap. Still a bit of time to actually run around.
It was so predictable. EJ put himself in a position he couldn't risk a debutant in such a tight game. I think there's a lot to be positive about but it's the kind of selection mistake he seems to make repeatedly.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by morepork »

Epaminondas Pules wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
True but most would suggest that is down to Youngs. As an aside, Youngs, Ford, Tuilagi and May all play together for Leicester where the backline (acceptedly with less than perfect ball from their forwards) does not exactly look slick. I think Youngs inflicts ceiling limitations and was disappointed that Robson got no game time. Why replace Care and then leave Youngs on? Care rarely sat the game out.
Eh? He clearly was struggling to find Faz in the first half, and that's down to Faz.
And fat lads being stood in the way at times.

Both of them are comical in broken play.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Banquo »

Epaminondas Pules wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
True but most would suggest that is down to Youngs. As an aside, Youngs, Ford, Tuilagi and May all play together for Leicester where the backline (acceptedly with less than perfect ball from their forwards) does not exactly look slick. I think Youngs inflicts ceiling limitations and was disappointed that Robson got no game time. Why replace Care and then leave Youngs on? Care rarely sat the game out.
Eh? He clearly was struggling to find Faz in the first half, and that's down to Faz.
And fat lads being stood in the way at times.
True, but that's up to Faz, mainly, to clear em out the way.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Banquo »

morepork wrote:
Epaminondas Pules wrote:
Banquo wrote: Eh? He clearly was struggling to find Faz in the first half, and that's down to Faz.
And fat lads being stood in the way at times.

Both of them are comical in broken play.
Surprising how much backward Youngs has gone in that respect; when he first appeared he was an instinctive player, dangerous in open play. Years of being told to box kick have fckd his game.
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Gloskarlos »

You would think after years of box kicking practise he would realise when his chaser is at the bottom of a ruck right at his very feet, not dally for an eternity, then sticking one up anyway...... thinking that’s his best option.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Banquo »

Gloskarlos wrote:You would think after years of box kicking practise he would realise when his chaser is at the bottom of a ruck right at his very feet, not dally for an eternity, then sticking one up anyway...... thinking that’s his best option.
weird, isn't it. Suspect he may not be awfully bright.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Raggs »

Gloskarlos wrote:You would think after years of box kicking practise he would realise when his chaser is at the bottom of a ruck right at his very feet, not dally for an eternity, then sticking one up anyway...... thinking that’s his best option.
Thing is, I was watching for that, and at least twice before, he deliberately ran another phase, just so May could get up off the floor from the previous one, then checked he was in position. Then he decides not to bother for that one.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Digby »

Raggs wrote:
Gloskarlos wrote:You would think after years of box kicking practise he would realise when his chaser is at the bottom of a ruck right at his very feet, not dally for an eternity, then sticking one up anyway...... thinking that’s his best option.
Thing is, I was watching for that, and at least twice before, he deliberately ran another phase, just so May could get up off the floor from the previous one, then checked he was in position. Then he decides not to bother for that one.
He did indeed seem to be checking much more than he has in the past before box kicking
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: England squad for start of 6N’s

Post by Gloskarlos »

Digby wrote:
Raggs wrote:
Gloskarlos wrote:You would think after years of box kicking practise he would realise when his chaser is at the bottom of a ruck right at his very feet, not dally for an eternity, then sticking one up anyway...... thinking that’s his best option.
Thing is, I was watching for that, and at least twice before, he deliberately ran another phase, just so May could get up off the floor from the previous one, then checked he was in position. Then he decides not to bother for that one.
He did indeed seem to be checking much more than he has in the past before box kicking
Dithering, dallying, stalling, faffing, pondering, and indeed 'checking' was what he was doing mostly.
Post Reply