Team for Wales

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Renniks
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Renniks »

Mikey Brown wrote:Is it time for me to post a semi-believable team that also has a 6/2 bench featuring Shields and no Robson/scrumhalf? Maybe Te'o at 13 for Slade? Too much? Too early?
Wait until 10:45 on Thursday, and you'll have me crying at my desk…

also, throw in a backrow of Shields (6) - Wilson (7) - Billy, and you might have me throwing my laptop away
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6373
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Oakboy »

Mikey Brown wrote:Is it time for me to post a semi-believable team that also has a 6/2 bench featuring Shields and no Robson/scrumhalf? Maybe Te'o at 13 for Slade? Too much? Too early?
You must just like upsetting people. :? :(
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Banquo »

Stom wrote:It matches up to what Digby said elsewhere...that Rugby is becoming less of an instinctive game and more about league style controlled games. Coaches want to remove the potential for "mistakes" by setting up as much structure as possible. And that means we get the situation where Farrell is preferred to Ford, because he does not deviate from the plan.

And it makes rugby more boring.

Football has been through that. And it now has a number of top teams whose gameplan is a mix of structure and unstructured play.
Football is much less structured to begin with.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Stom »

Banquo wrote:
Stom wrote:It matches up to what Digby said elsewhere...that Rugby is becoming less of an instinctive game and more about league style controlled games. Coaches want to remove the potential for "mistakes" by setting up as much structure as possible. And that means we get the situation where Farrell is preferred to Ford, because he does not deviate from the plan.

And it makes rugby more boring.

Football has been through that. And it now has a number of top teams whose gameplan is a mix of structure and unstructured play.
Football is much less structured to begin with.
There is that, but there was definitely a trend in the last decade to create highly structured football teams. But Zidane's multiple CL wins, coupled with the concentration of talent has meant the reintroduction of unstructured forward play.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Banquo »

Stom wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Stom wrote:It matches up to what Digby said elsewhere...that Rugby is becoming less of an instinctive game and more about league style controlled games. Coaches want to remove the potential for "mistakes" by setting up as much structure as possible. And that means we get the situation where Farrell is preferred to Ford, because he does not deviate from the plan.

And it makes rugby more boring.

Football has been through that. And it now has a number of top teams whose gameplan is a mix of structure and unstructured play.
Football is much less structured to begin with.
There is that, but there was definitely a trend in the last decade to create highly structured football teams. But Zidane's multiple CL wins, coupled with the concentration of talent has meant the reintroduction of unstructured forward play.
Be interesting if someone did try and 'change' Unions structures; Dwyer sort of had a go with his flat midfield and back three playing off them, but that got buried in multiphase rugby. I did wonder if someone would have a go at super rucks with three or four binding and driving a couple of yards beyond the ball, and seeing if uber fast ball in one or two phases would make a difference.

Anyone got any ideas for 'de-structuring' the game, other than actually applying the laws to ensure more forwards are tied in? Simply removing players doesnt really work (see League).
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Stom »

Banquo wrote:
Stom wrote:
Banquo wrote: Football is much less structured to begin with.
There is that, but there was definitely a trend in the last decade to create highly structured football teams. But Zidane's multiple CL wins, coupled with the concentration of talent has meant the reintroduction of unstructured forward play.
Be interesting if someone did try and 'change' Unions structures; Dwyer sort of had a go with his flat midfield and back three playing off them, but that got buried in multiphase rugby. I did wonder if someone would have a go at super rucks with three or four binding and driving a couple of yards beyond the ball, and seeing if uber fast ball in one or two phases would make a difference.

Anyone got any ideas for 'de-structuring' the game, other than actually applying the laws to ensure more forwards are tied in? Simply removing players doesnt really work (see League).
Well, you kind of excluded the point...the rules. They're there for a reason, we should be using them.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Banquo »

Stom wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Stom wrote:
There is that, but there was definitely a trend in the last decade to create highly structured football teams. But Zidane's multiple CL wins, coupled with the concentration of talent has meant the reintroduction of unstructured forward play.
Be interesting if someone did try and 'change' Unions structures; Dwyer sort of had a go with his flat midfield and back three playing off them, but that got buried in multiphase rugby. I did wonder if someone would have a go at super rucks with three or four binding and driving a couple of yards beyond the ball, and seeing if uber fast ball in one or two phases would make a difference.

Anyone got any ideas for 'de-structuring' the game, other than actually applying the laws to ensure more forwards are tied in? Simply removing players doesnt really work (see League).
Well, you kind of excluded the point...the rules. They're there for a reason, we should be using them.
Laws, and ok, kill the thread then :lol:

I was just looking if anyone had thought of different ways of playing, as it might be interesting.............
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6373
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Oakboy »

There can't be any major play variations left. 1st phase plays still have their place and innovation on a micro-scale has to be welcomed. It's thrust and counter-thrust as ever. Maybe, an organised turnover of ideas-men in the coaching set-up is the way to go. Arguably, Jones has managed that, to an extent, accidentally or not.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12150
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Mikey Brown »

I dunno. Townsend has been pretty innovative recently?

Have you seen this new ploy to maul it on open play? You form all the forwards together in a huddle, dragging in their opposite numbers to create space out wide, and then either give away a pen for offside or fumble it w forwards as they all reach for the same pass.

We've all so experimented with extended periods of refusing to take contact, either in attack or defence. It's had mixed results.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Digby »

Stom wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Stom wrote:It matches up to what Digby said elsewhere...that Rugby is becoming less of an instinctive game and more about league style controlled games. Coaches want to remove the potential for "mistakes" by setting up as much structure as possible. And that means we get the situation where Farrell is preferred to Ford, because he does not deviate from the plan.

And it makes rugby more boring.

Football has been through that. And it now has a number of top teams whose gameplan is a mix of structure and unstructured play.
Football is much less structured to begin with.
There is that, but there was definitely a trend in the last decade to create highly structured football teams. But Zidane's multiple CL wins, coupled with the concentration of talent has meant the reintroduction of unstructured forward play.
The number of games of football I've seen in the last decade, as in whole game rather than whilst channel hopping, is zero. The only thought I had about being in the world cup semi final was it made the roads very easy for driving. If I don't have much time for rugby I have no time for football
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by morepork »

Stom wrote:It matches up to what Digby said elsewhere...that Rugby is becoming less of an instinctive game and more about league style controlled games. Coaches want to remove the potential for "mistakes" by setting up as much structure as possible. And that means we get the situation where Farrell is preferred to Ford, because he does not deviate from the plan.

And it makes rugby more boring.

Football has been through that. And it now has a number of top teams whose gameplan is a mix of structure and unstructured play.

Depends on the coach. Gatand and Edwards were the classic stepford wives of the coaching world. Schmidt is a an updated version of it. The English domestic game seems riddled with robot coaches, hence the chronic lack of recognition for out and out modern loose forwards. France seems to have run out of room on the coaching hard drive all together. That's more a case of dull coaching rather than a limitation of the modern game.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Banquo »

morepork wrote:
Stom wrote:It matches up to what Digby said elsewhere...that Rugby is becoming less of an instinctive game and more about league style controlled games. Coaches want to remove the potential for "mistakes" by setting up as much structure as possible. And that means we get the situation where Farrell is preferred to Ford, because he does not deviate from the plan.

And it makes rugby more boring.

Football has been through that. And it now has a number of top teams whose gameplan is a mix of structure and unstructured play.

Depends on the coach. Gatand and Edwards were the classic stepford wives of the coaching world. Schmidt is a an updated version of it. The English domestic game seems riddled with robot coaches, hence the chronic lack of recognition for out and out modern loose forwards. France seems to have run out of room on the coaching hard drive all together. That's more a case of dull coaching rather than a limitation of the modern game.
Very good point(s)
TheDasher
Posts: 516
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:58 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by TheDasher »

Renniks wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/rugby-union/47279324

Enjoyed this

Their combined 15:

Mako, Owens, Sinckler
AWJ, Lawes
Wilson, Tipuric, Billy V
Youngs, Farrell
May, Tuilagi, Davies, North, Williams

Not sure I'd argue with that… Some through lack of better options, others close calls…
I might have George over Owens to be honest.

Whilst Lawes been playing well and is in great form, overall Launch is better than Lawes.

I've always thought Tipuric, though a lovely footballer, to be slightly overrated. I think Curry seems more physical, so, so impressed with him.

Otherwise, probably fair enough.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Stom »

TheDasher wrote:
Renniks wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/rugby-union/47279324

Enjoyed this

Their combined 15:

Mako, Owens, Sinckler
AWJ, Lawes
Wilson, Tipuric, Billy V
Youngs, Farrell
May, Tuilagi, Davies, North, Williams

Not sure I'd argue with that… Some through lack of better options, others close calls…
I might have George over Owens to be honest.

Whilst Lawes been playing well and is in great form, overall Launch is better than Lawes.

I've always thought Tipuric, though a lovely footballer, to be slightly overrated. I think Curry seems more physical, so, so impressed with him.

Otherwise, probably fair enough.
I would not want a midfield of Tuilagi and Davies...they have 1 hand between them.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Mellsblue »

Stom wrote:
TheDasher wrote:
Renniks wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/rugby-union/47279324

Enjoyed this

Their combined 15:

Mako, Owens, Sinckler
AWJ, Lawes
Wilson, Tipuric, Billy V
Youngs, Farrell
May, Tuilagi, Davies, North, Williams

Not sure I'd argue with that… Some through lack of better options, others close calls…
I might have George over Owens to be honest.

Whilst Lawes been playing well and is in great form, overall Launch is better than Lawes.

I've always thought Tipuric, though a lovely footballer, to be slightly overrated. I think Curry seems more physical, so, so impressed with him.

Otherwise, probably fair enough.
I would not want a midfield of Tuilagi and Davies...they have 1 hand between them.
Blimey. Imagine being in the back three, particularly right wing, outside Youngs - Farrell - Tuilagi - Davies. Boring.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Stom »

Wow, a leak...
Has John Mitchell given the game away?

England's defense coach was seen holding a clipboard with 23 names on it at England training today amid speculation of England's 23 to face Wales. Some of the names were obvious selections, but there were a couple of surprise picks.

The names were:
Ellis Genge
Jamie George
Kyle Sinckler
Ben Moon
Luke Cowan-Dickie
Harry Williams
Courtney Lawes
George Kruis
Maro Itoje
Mark Wilson
Tom Curry
Billy Vunipola
Jack Clifford
Ben Youngs
Dan Robson
Owen Farrell
George Ford
Manu Tuilagi
Henry Slade
Jonny May
Joe Cokanasiga
Jack Nowell
Elliot Daly

Question marks were also seen by the names of Itoje - who was not suspected back for the Wales game - Nowell, and Dan Robson, the scum half who made his debut against France. No other names were seen to suggest who would replace these 3 players if they were not involved.
Freddo
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:30 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Freddo »

Stom wrote:Wow, a leak...
Has John Mitchell given the game away?

England's defense coach was seen holding a clipboard with 23 names on it at England training today amid speculation of England's 23 to face Wales. Some of the names were obvious selections, but there were a couple of surprise picks.

The names were:
Ellis Genge
Jamie George
Kyle Sinckler
Ben Moon
Luke Cowan-Dickie
Harry Williams
Courtney Lawes
George Kruis
Maro Itoje
Mark Wilson
Tom Curry
Billy Vunipola
Jack Clifford
Ben Youngs
Dan Robson
Owen Farrell
George Ford
Manu Tuilagi
Henry Slade
Jonny May
Joe Cokanasiga
Jack Nowell
Elliot Daly

Question marks were also seen by the names of Itoje - who was not suspected back for the Wales game - Nowell, and Dan Robson, the scum half who made his debut against France. No other names were seen to suggest who would replace these 3 players if they were not involved.
Harsh.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Mellsblue »

Uh, oh. Remember the discussions we had when Neville addressed the squad under Lancaster? Well, hold on to your hats. John Terry addressed the squad today......
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12150
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Mikey Brown »

Right boys. Just heard a rumour via rugby inside line.

Paraphrasing here but the word on the street (according to a John Mitchell clipboard) is that Dan Robson will be replaced by non-specialist-scrum-half Brad Shields (if fit) in a roving, 9th forward capacity. If Shields isn't fit, the role may be filled by back-cum-9th-forward Jack Nowell, with Joe Cokanasiga coming into the side on the wing.
fivepointer
Posts: 5895
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by fivepointer »

25 players retained -

Forwards
Luke Cowan-Dickie (Exeter Chiefs)
Tom Curry (Sale Sharks)
Ellis Genge (Leicester Tigers)
Jamie George (Saracens)
Nathan Hughes (Wasps)
George Kruis (Saracens)
Joe Launchbury (Wasps)
Courtney Lawes (Northampton Saints)
Ben Moon (Exeter Chiefs)
Brad Shields (Wasps)
Kyle Sinckler (Harlequins)
Billy Vunipola (Saracens)
Harry Williams (Exeter Chiefs)
Mark Wilson (Newcastle Falcons)

Backs
Joe Cokanasiga (Bath Rugby)
Elliot Daly (Wasps)
Owen Farrell (Saracens) captain
George Ford (Leicester Tigers)
Jonny May (Leicester Tigers)
Jack Nowell (Exeter Chiefs)
Dan Robson (Wasps)
Henry Slade (Exeter Chiefs)
Ben Te’o (Worcester Warriors)
Manu Tuilagi (Leicester Tigers)
Ben Youngs (Leicester Tigers)
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12150
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Mikey Brown »

Hard luck Clifford. I got to excited there for a minute. Guess he's got to start really tearing it up like Brad Shields.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Mellsblue »

I blame Terry.
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3407
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

I like the idea of Terry talking to them today. There aren’t many who have asmuch experience playing in consistently hostile and vitriolic environments, both against team and personally. His experience in such would be pretty high. He’s also captained to significant success.
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Timbo »

He’s also an expert at playing away from home.
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3407
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Team for Wales

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Timbo wrote:He’s also an expert at playing away from home.
:D
Post Reply