S'not on
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 12150
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: S'not on
Hard to weigh that one up. It’s obviously a disgusting way to behave, and there’s no way you can argue it being a typical ‘heat of battle’ sort of cheap shot, but compared to any number of stamps, punches and dangerous tackles/clearances?
Hmm.
To flip flop on that even further. I’m not sure I’d judge anyone too harshly for responding with the kind of violence I mentioned there.
Hmm.
To flip flop on that even further. I’m not sure I’d judge anyone too harshly for responding with the kind of violence I mentioned there.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: S'not on
Was the recipients mouth open?
- Puja
- Posts: 17693
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
-
- Posts: 5895
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: S'not on
Bloody hell, that disgusting. What would be the sanction for spitting. I imagine something similar to this ban?
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: S'not on
This resonates of Voller/Rijkaard in '90..gobbing at an opponent usually brings a violent reaction.
Is nasal phlegm as bad as gobby oral saliva/phlegm ?
Microbiologically probably not, but directing any bodily fluid at an opponent must fall firmly in the unsporting behaviour/ungentlemanly conduct realm.In the days of the all-seeing magnifying lens and micro-analysis, the mind boggles.
Is nasal phlegm as bad as gobby oral saliva/phlegm ?
Microbiologically probably not, but directing any bodily fluid at an opponent must fall firmly in the unsporting behaviour/ungentlemanly conduct realm.In the days of the all-seeing magnifying lens and micro-analysis, the mind boggles.
