Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Moderator: Puja
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Not even a losing bonus point.
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
No, you're right, I'm sorry. He didn't cost us the game. He was utter shit, but he had nothing to do with the loss. I just lost my rag at another ridiculous decision.Buggaluggs wrote:Fuck off STOM you winy bitch. You got beat. accept itStom wrote:Sorry, I lied. Peyper has cost us this, awful reffing.
Ben Youngs and the inability of anyone in England management or team to think on their feet cost us the game. We didn't use ANY of our back subs, ffs, despite the game getting away.
It was embarrassing. Just embarrassing.
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Was it really well played Wales? I thought both teams were $hit TBH. Our fault for failing to adapt but that Welsh team is nowhere near good enough to win a grand slam.
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
If you’re only here to troll you can do one ...Buggaluggs wrote:Not even a losing bonus point.
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Fair play. Sorry I told you to go away. You can stay.Stom wrote:No, you're right, I'm sorry. He didn't cost us the game. He was utter shit, but he had nothing to do with the loss. I just lost my rag at another ridiculous decision.Buggaluggs wrote:Fuck off STOM you winy bitch. You got beat. accept itStom wrote:Sorry, I lied. Peyper has cost us this, awful reffing.
Ben Youngs and the inability of anyone in England management or team to think on their feet cost us the game. We didn't use ANY of our back subs, ffs, despite the game getting away.
It was embarrassing. Just embarrassing.
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
yeah. Sorry that was but wanker-ish wasn't itScrumhead wrote:If you’re only here to troll you can do one ...Buggaluggs wrote:Not even a losing bonus point.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Surprise surprise. Come up against a team that match us up front and Farrell looks poor and our ‘kick the leather off the ball’ tactics aren’t good enough.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
FT Wal 21 - 13 Eng
Defeat snatched from the jaws of victory by turgid, lack-lustre Eng.
Yet again, Wales fitness, determination and spirit carry them over the line.And not giving lots of silly penalties away in succession at a key time in the match.
Defeat snatched from the jaws of victory by turgid, lack-lustre Eng.
Yet again, Wales fitness, determination and spirit carry them over the line.And not giving lots of silly penalties away in succession at a key time in the match.
-
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Robson, Ford, Genge left hanging (not mentioning Hughes, Shields). Seriously wtf.Stom wrote:Well, he didn't cost us, but he was shit.morepork wrote:Stom wrote:Sorry, I lied. Peyper has cost us this, awful reffing.
You need to change the record bro.
Ben Youngs was an embarrassment. Farrell was shit. I just...can't believe no-one had the wit to change that. No-one.
Someone should be fired, it's that bad. I mean, you need to adapt.
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
223 tackles!! That has to be a record
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Why didn't Jones replace the England half backs early in the second half? Poor coaching decision.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Scrumhead wrote:Was it really well played Wales? I thought both teams were $hit TBH. Our fault for failing to adapt but that Welsh team is nowhere near good enough to win a grand slam.
Their line out was poose, and the box kicks were terrible. The midfield didn't really create much. They were however quite a bit better at the ruck than you have been used to in this comp so far. Both sides have kicking as the foundation tactic and there is a lot of luck riding off that. Just not today.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
They had miles better discipline than us.Scrumhead wrote:Was it really well played Wales? I thought both teams were $hit TBH. Our fault for failing to adapt but that Welsh team is nowhere near good enough to win a grand slam.
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
scrum half for sure. He's so slow. England need a stupid, but decisive scrum half. Don't over-think it, just do it and do it quick. FAZ, and the rest of the backs are really good. They just need the ball fast. Let them make the decisions.Spiffy wrote:Why didn't Jones replace the England half backs early in the second half? Poor coaching decision.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
We were monstered on territory and some extent on possession- we used the ball appallingly. Our defence was decent ish.
- Hooky
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:06 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Well I didn’t see that coming. Fully deserved epic from wales
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
More like composure. When the going got tough at around the 50 minute mark, they CHANGED THEIR PLAYERS. Were you allowed to do that? Isn't that cheating?Banquo wrote:They had miles better discipline than us.Scrumhead wrote:Was it really well played Wales? I thought both teams were $hit TBH. Our fault for failing to adapt but that Welsh team is nowhere near good enough to win a grand slam.
And then they were able to turn the screw. While we changed nothing, just slowly lost the game bit by bit...
Eddie deserves a shoeing for that performance. I mean, when things don't go right, you need to change it. We needed to swap out Youngs and probably Farrell, too, but we did nothing.
- Shiny
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
- Location: Bradford
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
England learn how to kick tactically in the first two games. Then forget everything else. My Granny makes faster decisions than Young’s and Farrell and she’s been dead 20 years.
Note to England: the tactical kicking doesn’t work if the opposition full back and wingers have played at any level past under 10’s.
Note to England: the tactical kicking doesn’t work if the opposition full back and wingers have played at any level past under 10’s.
The green, black and gold army.
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
100% agree. Left too many points out there in the first half and completely failed to adapt in the second. Eddie is totally to blame for this.
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Who would he bring on? with 200+ tackles, Ford would not do well. Wales would have run everything down his channel. FAZ may not have had his best day, but a soft channel he is not.Stom wrote:More like composure. ... but we did nothing.Banquo wrote:They had miles better discipline than us.Scrumhead wrote:Was it really well played Wales? I thought both teams were $hit TBH. Our fault for failing to adapt but that Welsh team is nowhere near good enough to win a grand slam.
-
- Posts: 5895
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
That was piss poor. Really poor. Thoughtless adherence to a game plan, lacking imagination, craft and vision. Opportunities to move the ball repeatedly ignored, possession aimlessly given back and bench ignored. 76 minutes before Genge came on. Robson, Ford and LCD ignored. Inexplicable from Jones with momentum switching to Wales during a 2nd half where we simply got worse by the minute.
we got exactly what we deserved - nothing.
we got exactly what we deserved - nothing.
-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Yet again I do hope it was because Kruis was knackered that he was replaced.
As for not even using Robso or Ford when our half backs are looking so bereft of ideas just stinks.
And there was me warming to Jones.
As for not even using Robso or Ford when our half backs are looking so bereft of ideas just stinks.
And there was me warming to Jones.
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
I tell you what though, Dan Biggar coming on with 20 left might have been the vinegar stroke in this game
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Ford might not make dominant tackles but he makes them and consistently. He's far from a liability in defence. Just lightweight so can't stop anyone dead.Buggaluggs wrote:Who would he bring on? with 200+ tackles, Ford would not do well. Wales would have run everything down his channel. FAZ may not have had his best day, but a soft channel he is not.Stom wrote:More like composure. ... but we did nothing.Banquo wrote: They had miles better discipline than us.
But that's a price you need to pay for control and we had 0. His passing game and game management is superb, so he'd be the perfect candidate for that role.
-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Wal vs. Eng - Match Thread
Indeed. Just glad you left it so lateBuggaluggs wrote:I tell you what though, Dan Biggar coming on with 20 left might have been the vinegar stroke in this game