Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Moderator: Puja

Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Banquo »

few high tackles flying about
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Banquo »

Bath ceding the gainline quite easily, though nice from Brizzle. Thacker very effective.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9179
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Which Tyler »

Banquo wrote:few high tackles flying about
Offside a lot as well. We're obviously scared of their attack
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Banquo »

No pens from Brizzle v 10 from Bath tells a tale.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by twitchy »

"A demented mole".
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Banquo »

bad miss, but not sure anyone can tap and go from the mark!
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Banquo »

I cursed Randall clearly
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9179
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Which Tyler »

Take note Freddie.
Miss an easy kick, and then find yourself across the try line, all in hand 1 minus later... put the bloody thing down!
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Timbo »

Tom Ellis has played well.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Banquo »

Dan Thomas is a good un, Bath might chuck this away.
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Timbo »

Priestland is so average.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Banquo »

Timbo wrote:Priestland is so average.
Yep, Ugo was raving about him, but meh. Mind a lot of what Ugo says 'sounds' reasonably put, until you analyse what he says, which is often self-contradicting nonsense.
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Timbo »

I bet Tigers are happy they traded Thacker for Polota-Nau.
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Timbo »

Does Mchonnochie have international potential?
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Banquo »

Timbo wrote:I bet Tigers are happy they traded Thacker for Polota-Nau.
aye, he was tremendous I thought.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Banquo »

Timbo wrote:Does Mchonnochie have international potential?
He looks very useful, they use his sevens skills well.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9179
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Which Tyler »

Timbo wrote:Does Mchonnochie have international potential?
I think so.
And quite honestly, if he can keep a spot in Bath's back 3, he'll deserve to be in contention
fivepointer
Posts: 5895
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by fivepointer »

Bris play a very high risk game that can backfire. Some of their play today was naive and sloppy.
Thacker was just terrific and is a key man in the Bris setup.
Bath took their chances and did defend well. JJ had a touch of class about him.
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Timbo »

All told probably fair to say JJ looked in a different class to every other player on the pitch.
Mush
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:23 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Mush »

fivepointer wrote:Bris play a very high risk game that can backfire. Some of their play today was naive and sloppy.
Thacker was just terrific and is a key man in the Bris setup.
Bath took their chances and did defend well. JJ had a touch of class about him.
Bristol have been naive and sloppy for the last few weeks and have to change several of the players or the tactics.
jimKRFC
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:42 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by jimKRFC »

Well done Bath, did what they needed to do to get the win.

Wish Bristol would stop giving tries away....
fivepointer
Posts: 5895
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by fivepointer »

Fine line between laudable ambition and recklessness. Bris have to work out when to play and when not to.
They are, though, good to watch and Pat Lam is doing a great job in moulding a competitive squad.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Scrumhead »

Which Tyler wrote:
Timbo wrote:Does Mchonnochie have international potential?
I think so.
And quite honestly, if he can keep a spot in Bath's back 3, he'll deserve to be in contention
I agree he looks good, but I’d question whether he’s good enough to get ahead of any of our current options on the wing and he doesn’t seem to be playing at 15 now Homer is fit.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9179
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Which Tyler »

Scrumhead wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:
Timbo wrote:Does Mchonnochie have international potential?
I think so.
And quite honestly, if he can keep a spot in Bath's back 3, he'll deserve to be in contention
I agree he looks good, but I’d question whether he’s good enough to get ahead of any of our current options on the wing and he doesn’t seem to be playing at 15 now Homer is fit.
He's good enough to be in the conversation, at wing or FB, but it's a place of strength for us (possible exception of FB, where we have several very good players who are slightly compromised at the back).
I think Ruaridh is best at FB, but I guess it's a more complex position to (re)learn after so long at 7s. His hands are wasted on the wing.
If he can keep a place in Bath's team next year, then at least one of Roko, Coka, Watson or Brew (all capped) out of the 23, and will deserve to be in the conversation.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham

Post by Scrumhead »

That’s fair enough. I’d also like to see more of him at fullback. From what I’ve seen, he’s tough and strong (a bit reminiscent of a younger Mike Brown, but with more pace, better hands and an eye for a gap as you’d expect from a 7s convert). I haven’t really seen him tested under a high ball though and given that Watson has expressed a preference to play 15, he’s realistically competing for a starting spot at 11 or 14 next season.

I’d definitely have him as a contender for the Barbarians game.
Post Reply