Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
few high tackles flying about
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Bath ceding the gainline quite easily, though nice from Brizzle. Thacker very effective.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Offside a lot as well. We're obviously scared of their attackBanquo wrote:few high tackles flying about
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
No pens from Brizzle v 10 from Bath tells a tale.
-
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
"A demented mole".
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
bad miss, but not sure anyone can tap and go from the mark!
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
I cursed Randall clearly
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Take note Freddie.
Miss an easy kick, and then find yourself across the try line, all in hand 1 minus later... put the bloody thing down!
Miss an easy kick, and then find yourself across the try line, all in hand 1 minus later... put the bloody thing down!
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Tom Ellis has played well.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Dan Thomas is a good un, Bath might chuck this away.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Priestland is so average.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Yep, Ugo was raving about him, but meh. Mind a lot of what Ugo says 'sounds' reasonably put, until you analyse what he says, which is often self-contradicting nonsense.Timbo wrote:Priestland is so average.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
I bet Tigers are happy they traded Thacker for Polota-Nau.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Does Mchonnochie have international potential?
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
aye, he was tremendous I thought.Timbo wrote:I bet Tigers are happy they traded Thacker for Polota-Nau.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
He looks very useful, they use his sevens skills well.Timbo wrote:Does Mchonnochie have international potential?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
I think so.Timbo wrote:Does Mchonnochie have international potential?
And quite honestly, if he can keep a spot in Bath's back 3, he'll deserve to be in contention
-
- Posts: 5895
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Bris play a very high risk game that can backfire. Some of their play today was naive and sloppy.
Thacker was just terrific and is a key man in the Bris setup.
Bath took their chances and did defend well. JJ had a touch of class about him.
Thacker was just terrific and is a key man in the Bris setup.
Bath took their chances and did defend well. JJ had a touch of class about him.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
All told probably fair to say JJ looked in a different class to every other player on the pitch.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:23 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Bristol have been naive and sloppy for the last few weeks and have to change several of the players or the tactics.fivepointer wrote:Bris play a very high risk game that can backfire. Some of their play today was naive and sloppy.
Thacker was just terrific and is a key man in the Bris setup.
Bath took their chances and did defend well. JJ had a touch of class about him.
-
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:42 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Well done Bath, did what they needed to do to get the win.
Wish Bristol would stop giving tries away....
Wish Bristol would stop giving tries away....
-
- Posts: 5895
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
Fine line between laudable ambition and recklessness. Bris have to work out when to play and when not to.
They are, though, good to watch and Pat Lam is doing a great job in moulding a competitive squad.
They are, though, good to watch and Pat Lam is doing a great job in moulding a competitive squad.
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
I agree he looks good, but I’d question whether he’s good enough to get ahead of any of our current options on the wing and he doesn’t seem to be playing at 15 now Homer is fit.Which Tyler wrote:I think so.Timbo wrote:Does Mchonnochie have international potential?
And quite honestly, if he can keep a spot in Bath's back 3, he'll deserve to be in contention
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
He's good enough to be in the conversation, at wing or FB, but it's a place of strength for us (possible exception of FB, where we have several very good players who are slightly compromised at the back).Scrumhead wrote:I agree he looks good, but I’d question whether he’s good enough to get ahead of any of our current options on the wing and he doesn’t seem to be playing at 15 now Homer is fit.Which Tyler wrote:I think so.Timbo wrote:Does Mchonnochie have international potential?
And quite honestly, if he can keep a spot in Bath's back 3, he'll deserve to be in contention
I think Ruaridh is best at FB, but I guess it's a more complex position to (re)learn after so long at 7s. His hands are wasted on the wing.
If he can keep a place in Bath's team next year, then at least one of Roko, Coka, Watson or Brew (all capped) out of the 23, and will deserve to be in the conversation.
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Bath v Bristol, Sat @ twickenham
That’s fair enough. I’d also like to see more of him at fullback. From what I’ve seen, he’s tough and strong (a bit reminiscent of a younger Mike Brown, but with more pace, better hands and an eye for a gap as you’d expect from a 7s convert). I haven’t really seen him tested under a high ball though and given that Watson has expressed a preference to play 15, he’s realistically competing for a starting spot at 11 or 14 next season.
I’d definitely have him as a contender for the Barbarians game.
I’d definitely have him as a contender for the Barbarians game.