Initial Training Squad

Moderator: Puja

Mikey Brown
Posts: 11963
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Initial Training Squad

Post by Mikey Brown »

Digby wrote:
Banquo wrote:His height is even more surprising given he was a hooker for Gosforth.
I don't think I ever knew that. I'd assumed 8 or perhaps a 6, and had I been told he played lock given when he played I'd have accepted that as more than reasonable.

Edit - Actually this suggests (even allowing for he's perhaps wearing heels rather than having studs going into the ground) he could play lock pretty much whenever;

Image

And he wasn't rake thin by any means.
Gosh. Was Mark Cueto kicking around that long?
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17619
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Initial Training Squad

Post by Puja »

Lizard wrote:
Puja wrote:
Lizard wrote:I'm just saying that since Hartley blazed the path, being a troubled youth out of Rotorua Boys High School with a penchant for terrible haircuts seems be a direct path into the upper echelons of English rugby.

I mean seriously, you really want to claim this on the basis of English blood?

Image
A direct path? They're not exactly rugby league players - Hartley wasn't capped by England until he'd been in the country 6 years. Harrison's only just started playing regularly for Saints this season and has only made it into a preliminary training squad after having been in the country 5 years.

Suggests to me that they both needed a significant amount of work to bring them up to standard after leaving NZ.

Puja
Unlike all those 18 year olds strolling straight from the playing fields of Eton into your national squad.
He's older than Itoje, Kruis, Billy V, Ford, Watson and Nowell. Clearly you in NZ should work on your development of young talent to try and get it up to our level.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Initial Training Squad

Post by Banquo »

Mikey Brown wrote:
Digby wrote:
Banquo wrote:His height is even more surprising given he was a hooker for Gosforth.
I don't think I ever knew that. I'd assumed 8 or perhaps a 6, and had I been told he played lock given when he played I'd have accepted that as more than reasonable.

Edit - Actually this suggests (even allowing for he's perhaps wearing heels rather than having studs going into the ground) he could play lock pretty much whenever;

Image

And he wasn't rake thin by any means.
Gosh. Was Mark Cueto kicking around that long?
Nope........14 is possibly Jon Sleightholme......doesn't look like Tony Underwood from behind. Is that Catt on the left?
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Initial Training Squad

Post by Digby »

Banquo wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:
Digby wrote:
I don't think I ever knew that. I'd assumed 8 or perhaps a 6, and had I been told he played lock given when he played I'd have accepted that as more than reasonable.

Edit - Actually this suggests (even allowing for he's perhaps wearing heels rather than having studs going into the ground) he could play lock pretty much whenever;

Image

And he wasn't rake thin by any means.
Gosh. Was Mark Cueto kicking around that long?
Nope........14 is possibly Jon Sleightholme......doesn't look like Tony Underwood from behind. Is that Catt on the left?
Yes it's Catt, and I thought it looked more like Sleightholme than Hunter
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Initial Training Squad

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:
Gosh. Was Mark Cueto kicking around that long?
Nope........14 is possibly Jon Sleightholme......doesn't look like Tony Underwood from behind. Is that Catt on the left?
Yes it's Catt, and I thought it looked more like Sleightholme than Hunter
I'd discounted Hunter as looking a bit short for him. Mind I did think Catt was Callard initially!
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Initial Training Squad

Post by Digby »

Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:
Banquo wrote: Nope........14 is possibly Jon Sleightholme......doesn't look like Tony Underwood from behind. Is that Catt on the left?
Yes it's Catt, and I thought it looked more like Sleightholme than Hunter
I'd discounted Hunter as looking a bit short for him. Mind I did think Catt was Callard initially!
There's also Hunter (or whoever did his boots) tended to get the black polish and just polish all over, so he'd perhaps not have had the strips of white showing. You just never know when this sort of info will prove useful
Peat
Posts: 1038
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: Initial Training Squad

Post by Peat »

Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:
Banquo wrote:His height is even more surprising given he was a hooker for Gosforth.
I don't think I ever knew that. I'd assumed 8 or perhaps a 6, and had I been told he played lock given when he played I'd have accepted that as more than reasonable.
I could be talking bollox of course- I was told that, but could have been made-up! Second row from his era much more likely.
A quick google of Jack Rowell Gosforth turns up two articles alleging he was a second row.
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Initial Training Squad

Post by Banquo »

Peat wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:
I don't think I ever knew that. I'd assumed 8 or perhaps a 6, and had I been told he played lock given when he played I'd have accepted that as more than reasonable.
I could be talking bollox of course- I was told that, but could have been made-up! Second row from his era much more likely.
A quick google of Jack Rowell Gosforth turns up two articles alleging he was a second row.
Thanks for that :)
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: Initial Training Squad

Post by jngf »

Spotted Steve Ojomoh at No.8 in that photo. Should have been first choice No.8 far more often than he was in Cooke and Rowell era. Very explosive and better than Richards or Clarke at 8 from '94 onwards imo.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6608
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Initial Training Squad

Post by Oakboy »

jngf wrote:Spotted Steve Ojomoh at No.8 in that photo. Should have been first choice No.8 far more often than he was in Cooke and Rowell era. Very explosive and better than Richards or Clarke at 8 from '94 onwards imo.
I always thought Ojomoh was a classic 10/70 player. He did 10 minutes worth of eye-catching stuff and very little in the other 70.
Post Reply