Glos Vs Bath

Moderator: Puja

Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Cips at it now. Generous advantage I'd say.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by 16th man »

Glos could really do with putting some men into the breakdown to slow the ball. Burns is shredding them off quick ball, whilst their pack just stand and watch.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Which Tyler wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:How'd he get through there?
delayed pass, Morgan missed him-ish
I know, but 4 defenders
Backpedalling I guess
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by twitchy »

Cracking game.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Half of two halves. Great game.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9179
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Which Tyler »

Please tell me underhill didn't just spit at

(Post-maul, 37 min to check the video later)

ETA: Just checked, i think there's good distance between them and he's just clearing his mouth. Camera angle made them look much closer on first viewing
Last edited by Which Tyler on Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9179
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Which Tyler »

Gotta say, they earned that
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Great stuff.
switchskier
Posts: 2302
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by switchskier »

Who says the back three players don't influence games? The difference at the minute has been Baths threat out wide and being clinical.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

switchskier wrote:Who says the back three players don't influence games? The difference at the minute has been Baths threat out wide and being clinical.
I dunno, who does say that :). The back three are likely to see as much ball as anyone these days.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Fair play, Morgan is going very well now :)
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9179
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Which Tyler »

Arse!
switchskier
Posts: 2302
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by switchskier »

Banquo wrote:
switchskier wrote:Who says the back three players don't influence games? The difference at the minute has been Baths threat out wide and being clinical.
I dunno, who does say that :). The back three are likely to see as much ball as anyone these days.
Unless you're Cockanasaiga evidently. He needs to get a lot more involved.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

switchskier wrote:
Banquo wrote:
switchskier wrote:Who says the back three players don't influence games? The difference at the minute has been Baths threat out wide and being clinical.
I dunno, who does say that :). The back three are likely to see as much ball as anyone these days.
Unless you're Cockanasaiga evidently. He needs to get a lot more involved.
6 runs, touched it more than McConnochie. Bath haven't had the ball much since the first 20 mins, when he was heavily involved.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

He was unlucky there, should have gone to ground earlier in hindsight
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Glaws attack is very good, not great defence from Bath tho- JJ too narrow....edit as were they all
Last edited by Banquo on Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9179
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Which Tyler »

Ridiculous time to end advantage
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Nice one Freddie
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

WTAF
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

daft, and then a rubbish exit
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Great kick Priestland, good option to bring him on , always said so :)
switchskier
Posts: 2302
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by switchskier »

Banquo wrote:
switchskier wrote:
Banquo wrote: I dunno, who does say that :). The back three are likely to see as much ball as anyone these days.
Unless you're Cockanasaiga evidently. He needs to get a lot more involved.
6 runs, touched it more than McConnochie. Bath haven't had the ball much since the first 20 mins, when he was heavily involved.
Fair enough and Bath have hardly had the ball since the first 20. I just feel that with his size and speed he should be in off his wing and looking for work a lot more.

Wouldn't have taken Burns off there but guess Todd wants territory.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by twitchy »

Loving this.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

enjoyable game still. Great try by Glaws. Cips going well.
Banquo
Posts: 19144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Glos Vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

switchskier wrote:
Banquo wrote:
switchskier wrote:
Unless you're Cockanasaiga evidently. He needs to get a lot more involved.
6 runs, touched it more than McConnochie. Bath haven't had the ball much since the first 20 mins, when he was heavily involved.
Fair enough and Bath have hardly had the ball since the first 20. I just feel that with his size and speed he should be in off his wing and looking for work a lot more.

Wouldn't have taken Burns off there but guess Todd wants territory.
Can only look for offensive work if you have the ball.
Post Reply