Glos Vs Bath
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Cips at it now. Generous advantage I'd say.
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Glos could really do with putting some men into the breakdown to slow the ball. Burns is shredding them off quick ball, whilst their pack just stand and watch.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Backpedalling I guessWhich Tyler wrote:I know, but 4 defendersBanquo wrote:delayed pass, Morgan missed him-ishWhich Tyler wrote:How'd he get through there?
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Half of two halves. Great game.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Please tell me underhill didn't just spit at
(Post-maul, 37 min to check the video later)
ETA: Just checked, i think there's good distance between them and he's just clearing his mouth. Camera angle made them look much closer on first viewing
(Post-maul, 37 min to check the video later)
ETA: Just checked, i think there's good distance between them and he's just clearing his mouth. Camera angle made them look much closer on first viewing
Last edited by Which Tyler on Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Gotta say, they earned that
-
- Posts: 2302
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Who says the back three players don't influence games? The difference at the minute has been Baths threat out wide and being clinical.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
I dunno, who does say thatswitchskier wrote:Who says the back three players don't influence games? The difference at the minute has been Baths threat out wide and being clinical.

-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Fair play, Morgan is going very well now 

- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2302
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Unless you're Cockanasaiga evidently. He needs to get a lot more involved.Banquo wrote:I dunno, who does say thatswitchskier wrote:Who says the back three players don't influence games? The difference at the minute has been Baths threat out wide and being clinical.. The back three are likely to see as much ball as anyone these days.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
6 runs, touched it more than McConnochie. Bath haven't had the ball much since the first 20 mins, when he was heavily involved.switchskier wrote:Unless you're Cockanasaiga evidently. He needs to get a lot more involved.Banquo wrote:I dunno, who does say thatswitchskier wrote:Who says the back three players don't influence games? The difference at the minute has been Baths threat out wide and being clinical.. The back three are likely to see as much ball as anyone these days.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
He was unlucky there, should have gone to ground earlier in hindsight
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Glaws attack is very good, not great defence from Bath tho- JJ too narrow....edit as were they all
Last edited by Banquo on Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9179
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Ridiculous time to end advantage
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
daft, and then a rubbish exit
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Great kick Priestland, good option to bring him on , always said so 

-
- Posts: 2302
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Fair enough and Bath have hardly had the ball since the first 20. I just feel that with his size and speed he should be in off his wing and looking for work a lot more.Banquo wrote:6 runs, touched it more than McConnochie. Bath haven't had the ball much since the first 20 mins, when he was heavily involved.switchskier wrote:Unless you're Cockanasaiga evidently. He needs to get a lot more involved.Banquo wrote: I dunno, who does say that. The back three are likely to see as much ball as anyone these days.
Wouldn't have taken Burns off there but guess Todd wants territory.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
enjoyable game still. Great try by Glaws. Cips going well.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Glos Vs Bath
Can only look for offensive work if you have the ball.switchskier wrote:Fair enough and Bath have hardly had the ball since the first 20. I just feel that with his size and speed he should be in off his wing and looking for work a lot more.Banquo wrote:6 runs, touched it more than McConnochie. Bath haven't had the ball much since the first 20 mins, when he was heavily involved.switchskier wrote:
Unless you're Cockanasaiga evidently. He needs to get a lot more involved.
Wouldn't have taken Burns off there but guess Todd wants territory.