Champions Cup Final
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 5983
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Champions Cup Final
Great try from Billy. Almost unstoppable from that range.
-
- Posts: 5895
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
Bravo Saracens. Massive all round effort and they emerged deserved winners. Showed tremendous character to come back from 0-10 down after being severely tested in defence.
Their England players all stood up, but kudos to Wray for a terrific game. Barrington did a sterling job when he came on early too.
Their England players all stood up, but kudos to Wray for a terrific game. Barrington did a sterling job when he came on early too.
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2459
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: Champions Cup Final
Was Spencer good?
- Puja
- Posts: 17693
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
Mells has it right - he was solid enough with only one real mistake against him (a box kick that went straight up) and went off after 50 for Wiggy.Mr Mwenda wrote:Was Spencer good?
Basically, if you already had it in your mind that he should start for England, he didn't dissuade you, but if you were looking for proof that he ought, he probably didn't do enough.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
Bloody brilliant! Intense, brutal and entertaining. Brad put in one feck of a shift, as did Kruis and (can’t believe I’m saying it) so did Farrell.
Both replacement props were excellent and Wray proved yet again how important he is to Sarries. Billy and Loz were class.
Both replacement props were excellent and Wray proved yet again how important he is to Sarries. Billy and Loz were class.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4292
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
Right Numbers...any dough from this ??Numbers wrote:Saracens by 10.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Champions Cup Final
Best 5, 6, 7 combo in Europe!!p/d wrote:Bloody brilliant! Intense, brutal and entertaining. Brad put in one feck of a shift, as did Kruis and (can’t believe I’m saying it) so did Farrell.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
If England want a tough, hard-running, line-straightening, ball-carrying, defensively sound 12, with some dog and leadership qualities, then Barritt still has much to offer (and he can do more than that too). Especially since he would be playing outside his clubmate Farrell. I'd have him in the squad ahead of Te'o any day (yes - I don't know if Jones sees Te'o as a 12 or 13 ; don't know if Jones knows either.)p/d wrote:Bloody brilliant! Intense, brutal and entertaining. Brad put in one feck of a shift, as did Kruis and (can’t believe I’m saying it) so did Farrell.
Both replacement props were excellent and Wray proved yet again how important he is to Sarries. Billy and Loz were class.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
George put in a hell of shift too. Barritt's stats are pretty astonishing in defence- 28 tackles, none missed, has to be some sort of a record for a centre. Carried pretty well, and is a top skipper.p/d wrote:Bloody brilliant! Intense, brutal and entertaining. Brad put in one feck of a shift, as did Kruis and (can’t believe I’m saying it) so did Farrell.
Both replacement props were excellent and Wray proved yet again how important he is to Sarries. Billy and Loz were class.
Faz was everywhere in defence- fair play.
The tackle count for some of the Sarries players, including missed, demonstrates how much they worked for each other. Great game I thought, despite handling errors.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Champions Cup Final
I thought Williams was the classiest player on the pitch. It mattered a lot that in the engine room Saracens second row outplayed the opposing pair which is a major achievement. Above all, though, Saracens are probably the best club team as a unit since the game went professional. And, when it comes fown to the finer margins, they won because their bench was significantly superior to Leinster's.
It was a superb win.
It was a superb win.
-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
I knew Brad put in some tackles but those stats are amazing.
Agree with Spiffy regards what he could bring to the Work nand team, the rock for the rest to play off. Ain’t going to happen.
Yep George was good as was Goode
Agree with Spiffy regards what he could bring to the Work nand team, the rock for the rest to play off. Ain’t going to happen.
Yep George was good as was Goode
- Puja
- Posts: 17693
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
I still maintain Itoje put in a great performance as a lock and Saracens looked like they were missing a backrow. It worked cause they overpowered Leinster, but they looked vulnerable at the breakdown, especially in the first half. He's not a 6, but a third lock that happens to be packing down on the side of the scrum.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Champions Cup Final
Agreed. It close between him and Penaud for my favourite player.Oakboy wrote:I thought Williams was the classiest player on the pitch.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
Fair point on Williams, what he did was classy. Also agree with Puja on Itoje, but the tackle count and breakdown work of the whole team kinda compensated for being a backrow down- pretty sure Rhodes would have started if fit. Losing Mako looked like it would be huge in that context, but they all reacted brilliantly.Oakboy wrote:I thought Williams was the classiest player on the pitch. It mattered a lot that in the engine room Saracens second row outplayed the opposing pair which is a major achievement. Above all, though, Saracens are probably the best club team as a unit since the game went professional. And, when it comes fown to the finer margins, they won because their bench was significantly superior to Leinster's.
It was a superb win.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Champions Cup Final
I think Itoje at 6 is not ideal but rate him in the shirt. Saracens' management team don't do sentimental so picking him in the backrow ahead of Burger must mean he is the better of the two currently. I also think there was no question of trying to squeeze both Skelton and Itoje into the XV for any other reason. Let's face it, they have been ruthless with Isiekwe recently. He does not make the bench if everyone is fit yet he'd walk into the starting second row of most clubs.Banquo wrote:Fair point on Williams, what he did was classy. Also agree with Puja on Itoje, but the tackle count and breakdown work of the whole team kinda compensated for being a backrow down- pretty sure Rhodes would have started if fit. Losing Mako looked like it would be huge in that context, but they all reacted brilliantly.Oakboy wrote:I thought Williams was the classiest player on the pitch. It mattered a lot that in the engine room Saracens second row outplayed the opposing pair which is a major achievement. Above all, though, Saracens are probably the best club team as a unit since the game went professional. And, when it comes fown to the finer margins, they won because their bench was significantly superior to Leinster's.
It was a superb win.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
It was a compromise that worked in the end. Burger is pretty average these days, but Rhodes would have been starting for sure. Saying Itoje is a better option than Burger in the back row (and indeed starting Wray at 7) is more a comment on Burger than anything else, that and Sarries back row options being limited by injury.Oakboy wrote:I think Itoje at 6 is not ideal but rate him in the shirt. Saracens' management team don't do sentimental so picking him in the backrow ahead of Burger must mean he is the better of the two currently. I also think there was no question of trying to squeeze both Skelton and Itoje into the XV for any other reason. Let's face it, they have been ruthless with Isiekwe recently. He does not make the bench if everyone is fit yet he'd walk into the starting second row of most clubs.Banquo wrote:Fair point on Williams, what he did was classy. Also agree with Puja on Itoje, but the tackle count and breakdown work of the whole team kinda compensated for being a backrow down- pretty sure Rhodes would have started if fit. Losing Mako looked like it would be huge in that context, but they all reacted brilliantly.Oakboy wrote:I thought Williams was the classiest player on the pitch. It mattered a lot that in the engine room Saracens second row outplayed the opposing pair which is a major achievement. Above all, though, Saracens are probably the best club team as a unit since the game went professional. And, when it comes fown to the finer margins, they won because their bench was significantly superior to Leinster's.
It was a superb win.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
Williams is an interesting player. He is not particularly fast but has a knack of getting around his man, with footwork, timing and some great lines. He is not big, but agressive in defence and superb in the air. His rugby intelligence/game reading/anticipation/ball use, are a big part of his success. A nose for the line too, and always seems to rise to the occasion in big games.Banquo wrote:Fair point on Williams, what he did was classy. Also agree with Puja on Itoje, but the tackle count and breakdown work of the whole team kinda compensated for being a backrow down- pretty sure Rhodes would have started if fit. Losing Mako looked like it would be huge in that context, but they all reacted brilliantly.Oakboy wrote:I thought Williams was the classiest player on the pitch. It mattered a lot that in the engine room Saracens second row outplayed the opposing pair which is a major achievement. Above all, though, Saracens are probably the best club team as a unit since the game went professional. And, when it comes fown to the finer margins, they won because their bench was significantly superior to Leinster's.
It was a superb win.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
Brilliant under the high ball and fights for the ball.Spiffy wrote:Williams is an interesting player. He is not particularly fast but has a knack of getting around his man, with footwork, timing and some great lines. He is not big, but agressive in defence and superb in the air. His rugby intelligence/game reading/anticipation/ball use, are a big part of his success. A nose for the line too, and always seems to rise to the occasion in big games.Banquo wrote:Fair point on Williams, what he did was classy. Also agree with Puja on Itoje, but the tackle count and breakdown work of the whole team kinda compensated for being a backrow down- pretty sure Rhodes would have started if fit. Losing Mako looked like it would be huge in that context, but they all reacted brilliantly.Oakboy wrote:I thought Williams was the classiest player on the pitch. It mattered a lot that in the engine room Saracens second row outplayed the opposing pair which is a major achievement. Above all, though, Saracens are probably the best club team as a unit since the game went professional. And, when it comes fown to the finer margins, they won because their bench was significantly superior to Leinster's.
It was a superb win.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Champions Cup Final
Overall, especially with so much kicking in the modern game, I think Williams is arguably the best back three player in the world. Shame he's Welsh.Banquo wrote:Brilliant under the high ball and fights for the ball.Spiffy wrote:Williams is an interesting player. He is not particularly fast but has a knack of getting around his man, with footwork, timing and some great lines. He is not big, but agressive in defence and superb in the air. His rugby intelligence/game reading/anticipation/ball use, are a big part of his success. A nose for the line too, and always seems to rise to the occasion in big games.Banquo wrote: Fair point on Williams, what he did was classy. Also agree with Puja on Itoje, but the tackle count and breakdown work of the whole team kinda compensated for being a backrow down- pretty sure Rhodes would have started if fit. Losing Mako looked like it would be huge in that context, but they all reacted brilliantly.
-
- Posts: 19144
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
quite a big argument, that.Oakboy wrote:Overall, especially with so much kicking in the modern game, I think Williams is arguably the best back three player in the world. Shame he's Welsh.Banquo wrote:Brilliant under the high ball and fights for the ball.Spiffy wrote:
Williams is an interesting player. He is not particularly fast but has a knack of getting around his man, with footwork, timing and some great lines. He is not big, but agressive in defence and superb in the air. His rugby intelligence/game reading/anticipation/ball use, are a big part of his success. A nose for the line too, and always seems to rise to the occasion in big games.
- Puja
- Posts: 17693
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
No, he's definitely Welsh. They've checked this time.Banquo wrote:quite a big argument, that.Oakboy wrote:Overall, especially with so much kicking in the modern game, I think Williams is arguably the best back three player in the world. Shame he's Welsh.Banquo wrote: Brilliant under the high ball and fights for the ball.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 12151
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Champions Cup Final
Cuthbert will requalify on residency soon won’t he?
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Champions Cup Final
Well, except for the fact he's obviously capped... Does the 7s loophole still exist? Do we want it to?