I do pride myself on being an iconoclast.Digby wrote:We were all thinking it, thankfully someone has stepped forward to say itPuja wrote:Which does seem to me utterly bananas.
Puja
Moderator: Puja
I do pride myself on being an iconoclast.Digby wrote:We were all thinking it, thankfully someone has stepped forward to say itPuja wrote:Which does seem to me utterly bananas.
Possibly true, but I didn't think in this instance you were tearing down an icon. Maybe the legend of Which has grown so slowly I've simply not noticed, though granted it'd still have been moving faster than HeinzPuja wrote:I do pride myself on being an iconoclast.Digby wrote:We were all thinking it, thankfully someone has stepped forward to say itPuja wrote:Which does seem to me utterly bananas.
Puja
Are you claiming it?Puja wrote:I do pride myself on being an iconoclast.Digby wrote:We were all thinking it, thankfully someone has stepped forward to say itPuja wrote:Which does seem to me utterly bananas.
Puja
I'm a legend in my own lunchtime - I'll have you know!Digby wrote:Possibly true, but I didn't think in this instance you were tearing down an icon. Maybe the legend of Which has grown so slowly I've simply not noticed, though granted it'd still have been moving faster than HeinzPuja wrote:I do pride myself on being an iconoclast.Digby wrote:
We were all thinking it, thankfully someone has stepped forward to say it
Puja
I did wonder if anyone had mentioned Ludlam as he seemingly was focused on getting stuck into the Welsh flanker and had no idea the ball had gone.Banquo wrote:for finishing, yes, for making the break, big minuses on Ludlam and Billy imo.Epaminondas Pules wrote:Interesting first half. Heinz started well and dropped off towards the end. Genge the opposite. Ford looking good. JJ moving well. Forwards coming on to the ball well. Ludlum has been very busy. Defensively very good. Worry about Curry, but hopefully precaution.
Credit to Davies. Both steps were bloody beautiful! There’s little crime in being done by class. Credit the scorer.
Our overall defence was shoddy. JJ down for three missed tackles is a bit of a surprise. Ford 8 and 0 and second top
I think Daly would be fine to return to the left, accepting that the nuance of defending the blindside from a scrum is a crucial left wngers skills.Digby wrote:I did wonder if anyone had mentioned Ludlam as he seemingly was focused on getting stuck into the Welsh flanker and had no idea the ball had gone.Banquo wrote:for finishing, yes, for making the break, big minuses on Ludlam and Billy imo.Epaminondas Pules wrote:Interesting first half. Heinz started well and dropped off towards the end. Genge the opposite. Ford looking good. JJ moving well. Forwards coming on to the ball well. Ludlum has been very busy. Defensively very good. Worry about Curry, but hopefully precaution.
Credit to Davies. Both steps were bloody beautiful! There’s little crime in being done by class. Credit the scorer.
Our overall defence was shoddy. JJ down for three missed tackles is a bit of a surprise. Ford 8 and 0 and second top
I'm not sure either why Cokanasiga was defending out on the left, that there was a breakdown between Heinz and Big Joe is understandable, that they're learning to play together this close to a WC somewhat odd
Still, we're back to the left winger issue, which is a nice circle to complete after a period of Daly and May
I was merely pointing out that the initial fault was all down to Ludlam.Raggs wrote:Agree that being held made no difference by then, but a different run of play may well have seen that the hold meant he was out of position of the next phase etc.
For me the back three would be May, Coka, Watson, with Daly on the bench. Youngs, ford, may, manu, slade, coka, watson. With Farrell and Daly benching. Covers all positions 11-15, mix of power, distribution and speed.
I just fear that Daly is not a natural (or indeed club) FB and, when things are tough, you need the instinct. Which is not to say he looks awesome when England are on top: scything runs from the back, or even the occasional drop goal. But in times of stress, you need a nutter who can catch and tackle.jngf wrote:Initial thoughts:
England great in attack, leaky in places in defence.
Wales looked a bit ‘undercooked’
[deleted]
Daly’s a highly skilled footballer but still looks uncomfortable at fullback - Brown might have come into his own in that type of game?
good spot. You'd think if we got quick ball there Wales would be utterly screwed.ad_tigger wrote:That is a hell of a pic. To be fair, LCD is in shot just hidden behind the welsh guy in the scrum cap. Good job too as Manu would've been turned over if he hadn't got to the resulting ruck sharpish. (I only spotted him after going to rugbydump to watch the video and check that the photo wasn't a fake.
Thought Billy looked pretty trim and all the better for it.Renniks wrote:Moriarty does great to catch Manu here, the line obviously helps but it was still impressive to see (that 3 stone saving on Billy… also explaining why he got absolutely flattened by Billy)
Yeah - I thought he was looking svelte too, just amusing that the stats said he was 3 stone heavier and the same height as MoriartyBanquo wrote:Thought Billy looked pretty trim and all the better for it.Renniks wrote:Moriarty does great to catch Manu here, the line obviously helps but it was still impressive to see (that 3 stone saving on Billy… also explaining why he got absolutely flattened by Billy)
Just because two thirds of the Welsh defence would be stood within 5m of each other doesn't mean we could find and use the space.Banquo wrote:good spot. You'd think if we got quick ball there Wales would be utterly screwed.ad_tigger wrote:That is a hell of a pic. To be fair, LCD is in shot just hidden behind the welsh guy in the scrum cap. Good job too as Manu would've been turned over if he hadn't got to the resulting ruck sharpish. (I only spotted him after going to rugbydump to watch the video and check that the photo wasn't a fake.
Yo'ure forgetting - Farrell was in the standsDigby wrote:Just because two thirds of the Welsh defence would be stood within 5m of each other doesn't mean we could find and use the space.Banquo wrote:good spot. You'd think if we got quick ball there Wales would be utterly screwed.ad_tigger wrote:That is a hell of a pic. To be fair, LCD is in shot just hidden behind the welsh guy in the scrum cap. Good job too as Manu would've been turned over if he hadn't got to the resulting ruck sharpish. (I only spotted him after going to rugbydump to watch the video and check that the photo wasn't a fake.
Ford spends a huge amount of time in the backfield when defending, works well on quick counter attacks, as Slade is still there immediately to take advantage. Virtually every time Daly took one of the overly long welsh kicks, he passed to Ford to do something with it. Also helps with the kicking. Don't think May or Watson are awful kickers either, no idea on big Joe. Truth is though, 9 times out of 10, I'd rather that back three be running it backBanquo wrote:I was merely pointing out that the initial fault was all down to Ludlam.Raggs wrote:Agree that being held made no difference by then, but a different run of play may well have seen that the hold meant he was out of position of the next phase etc.
For me the back three would be May, Coka, Watson, with Daly on the bench. Youngs, ford, may, manu, slade, coka, watson. With Farrell and Daly benching. Covers all positions 11-15, mix of power, distribution and speed.
Your back three is attractive in terms of individual running skills, but kicking would be a tad problematic imo, as would linking the backfield as counterattackers.
I think you are overstating how much Ford is in the backfield; and the point I made still stands about the collective footballing skills of your back 3- none has test standard kicking nor the ability to link play. Sure I like them to run, but it lacks balance and sometimes you just need to get it out of play. Nice problem to have in some ways.Raggs wrote:Ford spends a huge amount of time in the backfield when defending, works well on quick counter attacks, as Slade is still there immediately to take advantage. Virtually every time Daly took one of the overly long welsh kicks, he passed to Ford to do something with it. Also helps with the kicking. Don't think May or Watson are awful kickers either, no idea on big Joe. Truth is though, 9 times out of 10, I'd rather that back three be running it backBanquo wrote:I was merely pointing out that the initial fault was all down to Ludlam.Raggs wrote:Agree that being held made no difference by then, but a different run of play may well have seen that the hold meant he was out of position of the next phase etc.
For me the back three would be May, Coka, Watson, with Daly on the bench. Youngs, ford, may, manu, slade, coka, watson. With Farrell and Daly benching. Covers all positions 11-15, mix of power, distribution and speed.
Your back three is attractive in terms of individual running skills, but kicking would be a tad problematic imo, as would linking the backfield as counterattackers..
and what was Slade doingRaggs wrote:I could happily rewatch the last game if you can find me a link? I just recall Ford getting pass after pass from Daly.
He’s dropped the best part of a stone since the Grand Slam.Banquo wrote:Thought Billy looked pretty trim and all the better for it.Renniks wrote:Moriarty does great to catch Manu here, the line obviously helps but it was still impressive to see (that 3 stone saving on Billy… also explaining why he got absolutely flattened by Billy)
Think he passed one, where we fielded the high ball on our right, went left to Ford who then gave to the Cokanasige.Banquo wrote:and what was Slade doingRaggs wrote:I could happily rewatch the last game if you can find me a link? I just recall Ford getting pass after pass from Daly.. I don't have the same memory (huge amount), but not going to fall out over it. When Ford did get a pass in the backfield, and I remember two, he kicked it.
Maybe its a personal preference, but I like a good all round footballer in the back three, who helps co=ordinate the others, and I really do think that its important that there is a class kicker in the back three, and not just for length, but the occasional chip through etc.
ah ok.Epaminondas Pules wrote:Think he passed one, where we fielded the high ball on our right, went left to Ford who then gave to the Cokanasige.Banquo wrote:and what was Slade doingRaggs wrote:I could happily rewatch the last game if you can find me a link? I just recall Ford getting pass after pass from Daly.. I don't have the same memory (huge amount), but not going to fall out over it. When Ford did get a pass in the backfield, and I remember two, he kicked it.
Maybe its a personal preference, but I like a good all round footballer in the back three, who helps co=ordinate the others, and I really do think that its important that there is a class kicker in the back three, and not just for length, but the occasional chip through etc.
And totally agree on a kicker in the back three. Watson is a decent clearer to touch, but I’d not think of him tactically kicking.