This scoreline Without a great scrum half is quite somethingSandydragon wrote:So English fans must be a lot happier this week. Lots to be happy about with that result, but if only you had a scrum half.
Next up, Ireland
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: Next up, Ireland
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Next up, Ireland
Yes, for Heinz to be such an improvement on Jones's 1st choice is horrendous.
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:30 pm
Re: Next up, Ireland
Daly needs to spend the next four weeks on one on ones and the high ball. Nothing else just catching and tackling every bloody day.
-
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Next up, Ireland
I read mako was injured?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14564
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Next up, Ireland
Hehe.Spiffy wrote:We was robbed !!
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Next up, Ireland
Yes, commentary team said it was his knee but I thought it could be the hamstring again.twitchy wrote:I read mako was injured?
-
- Posts: 3407
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: Next up, Ireland
That is a buttfucking of the highest order! Stop moaning! That’s a proper raping!! Of Ireland! If it wasn’t perfect then so bet it!
I shall watch it again sober! It may be a while before I am sober!
I fucking love you! Apart from you; you’re a cunt!
I shall watch it again sober! It may be a while before I am sober!
I fucking love you! Apart from you; you’re a cunt!
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14564
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Next up, Ireland
Jones confirms hamstring. Precautionary replacement only.Oakboy wrote:Yes, commentary team said it was his knee but I thought it could be the hamstring again.twitchy wrote:I read mako was injured?
- jngf
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: Next up, Ireland
4 players I thought shone today in the pack:
1. Itoje has his best game since has first test season - really nice return of his fetching skills and a nice try (I’m still sure he could deputise for Billy at a stretch - not that anyone else believes me yet
)
2. Underhill was phenomenal and is starting to look like England’s Pocock!
3.Curry - at first thought blindside berth would shackle home somewhat but he still was able to produce some lovely linking play.
4. Kruis had one of his better games for England and word had obviously got back him about my cuddly comment
1. Itoje has his best game since has first test season - really nice return of his fetching skills and a nice try (I’m still sure he could deputise for Billy at a stretch - not that anyone else believes me yet

2. Underhill was phenomenal and is starting to look like England’s Pocock!
3.Curry - at first thought blindside berth would shackle home somewhat but he still was able to produce some lovely linking play.
4. Kruis had one of his better games for England and word had obviously got back him about my cuddly comment

- Oakboy
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Next up, Ireland
I thought Kruis's rigid hands were a real downside on at least one occasion.
- Shiny
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
- Location: Bradford
Re: Next up, Ireland
It’s taken me a while but I am seeing that it can’t be a coincidence that with Ford 10 Farrell 12 we play our best rugby. I don’t like it, but it seems to happen. And it does pain me to say it.
The green, black and gold army.
- Shiny
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
- Location: Bradford
Re: Next up, Ireland
That and a blip aside, service and kicking from scrum half improved 100% when Heinz came on. God preserve us all..........
The green, black and gold army.
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: Next up, Ireland
I think that Tuilagi at 13 made Ford / Farrell look really good today too…
Much better than Slade outside them trying to play that role
Much better than Slade outside them trying to play that role
-
- Posts: 12155
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Next up, Ireland
Yep. Never seemed we quite worked out the correct role for Slade at 13. Was starting to get there when paired with Tuilagi but that’s probably out the window. I’d like him in the bench covering midfield though.Renniks wrote:I think that Tuilagi at 13 made Ford / Farrell look really good today too…
Much better than Slade outside them trying to play that role
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9186
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Next up, Ireland
Works well with JJ there as well mind...
Imagine that, carrying threats can be useful for playmakers?
Notnthat I mind it, but I still prefer the ideas of:
Ford, Slade, Manu/JJ
Ford, Manu, JJ/Slade
Too late now though, and Ford Farrell Manu/JJ has worked too well, though I still have concerns about pairing Farrell and Manu in defence
Imagine that, carrying threats can be useful for playmakers?
Notnthat I mind it, but I still prefer the ideas of:
Ford, Slade, Manu/JJ
Ford, Manu, JJ/Slade
Too late now though, and Ford Farrell Manu/JJ has worked too well, though I still have concerns about pairing Farrell and Manu in defence
Last edited by Which Tyler on Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am
Re: Next up, Ireland
Also agree on Tuilagi adding balance to Ford and Farrell. Slade or Joseph running those hardlines just doesn't free up the back three like Tuilagi running them, and neither are unable to carry on that hard line either. Worrying thing is if Tuilagi gets injured there's no like for like replacement, with Teo now nowhere to be seen.
Tuilagi has quickly probably become more most important player going into the world cup.
Tuilagi has quickly probably become more most important player going into the world cup.
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: Next up, Ireland
That bastard ref did for us, so he did.Spiffy wrote:We was robbed !!
Idle Feck
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:38 pm
Re: Next up, Ireland
Is this the one on 62 minutes? I was trying to work out what was going on. Is it not a maul if you hold up the catcher?Renniks wrote:Been the rule for quite a whileMr Mwenda wrote:Mauls off a kick a different? Is that new?
-
- Posts: 3827
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Next up, Ireland
As SCW said. Farrell was the difference today.
Best shat his pants when he saw the Ice Man walk out
Best shat his pants when he saw the Ice Man walk out
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: Next up, Ireland
16.18 If a maul is formed immediately after a player has directly caught an opponent’s kick in open play, a scrum that is awarded for any of the above reasons will be to the team of the ball catcher.JellyHead wrote:Is this the one on 62 minutes? I was trying to work out what was going on. Is it not a maul if you hold up the catcher?Renniks wrote:Been the rule for quite a whileMr Mwenda wrote:Mauls off a kick a different? Is that new?
-
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am
Re: Next up, Ireland
Makes sense really. If you had a pinpoint boxkicker and a hugely strong winger you could just marshal your way down the field holding players up.Renniks wrote:16.18 If a maul is formed immediately after a player has directly caught an opponent’s kick in open play, a scrum that is awarded for any of the above reasons will be to the team of the ball catcher.JellyHead wrote:Is this the one on 62 minutes? I was trying to work out what was going on. Is it not a maul if you hold up the catcher?Renniks wrote:
Been the rule for quite a while
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:38 pm
Re: Next up, Ireland
Thanks. Not a rule I knew.Renniks wrote:16.18 If a maul is formed immediately after a player has directly caught an opponent’s kick in open play, a scrum that is awarded for any of the above reasons will be to the team of the ball catcher.JellyHead wrote:Is this the one on 62 minutes? I was trying to work out what was going on. Is it not a maul if you hold up the catcher?Renniks wrote:
Been the rule for quite a while
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14564
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Next up, Ireland
What the f**k.p/d wrote:As SCW said. Farrell was the difference today.
Best shat his pants when he saw the Ice Man walk out
Ah. I see what you did there.