Next up, Ireland

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Renniks
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Renniks »

Sandydragon wrote:So English fans must be a lot happier this week. Lots to be happy about with that result, but if only you had a scrum half.
This scoreline Without a great scrum half is quite something
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Oakboy »

Yes, for Heinz to be such an improvement on Jones's 1st choice is horrendous.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14564
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Mellsblue »

Uh oh.
Freddo
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:30 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Freddo »

Daly needs to spend the next four weeks on one on ones and the high ball. Nothing else just catching and tackling every bloody day.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by twitchy »

I read mako was injured?
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1986
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Spiffy »

We was robbed !!
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14564
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Mellsblue »

Spiffy wrote:We was robbed !!
Hehe.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Oakboy »

twitchy wrote:I read mako was injured?
Yes, commentary team said it was his knee but I thought it could be the hamstring again.
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3407
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

That is a buttfucking of the highest order! Stop moaning! That’s a proper raping!! Of Ireland! If it wasn’t perfect then so bet it!

I shall watch it again sober! It may be a while before I am sober!

I fucking love you! Apart from you; you’re a cunt!
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14564
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Mellsblue »

Oakboy wrote:
twitchy wrote:I read mako was injured?
Yes, commentary team said it was his knee but I thought it could be the hamstring again.
Jones confirms hamstring. Precautionary replacement only.
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1571
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by jngf »

4 players I thought shone today in the pack:

1. Itoje has his best game since has first test season - really nice return of his fetching skills and a nice try (I’m still sure he could deputise for Billy at a stretch - not that anyone else believes me yet :) )

2. Underhill was phenomenal and is starting to look like England’s Pocock!

3.Curry - at first thought blindside berth would shackle home somewhat but he still was able to produce some lovely linking play.

4. Kruis had one of his better games for England and word had obviously got back him about my cuddly comment :)
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Oakboy »

I thought Kruis's rigid hands were a real downside on at least one occasion.
User avatar
Shiny
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
Location: Bradford

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Shiny »

It’s taken me a while but I am seeing that it can’t be a coincidence that with Ford 10 Farrell 12 we play our best rugby. I don’t like it, but it seems to happen. And it does pain me to say it.
The green, black and gold army.
User avatar
Shiny
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
Location: Bradford

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Shiny »

That and a blip aside, service and kicking from scrum half improved 100% when Heinz came on. God preserve us all..........
The green, black and gold army.
Renniks
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Renniks »

I think that Tuilagi at 13 made Ford / Farrell look really good today too…

Much better than Slade outside them trying to play that role
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12155
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Mikey Brown »

Renniks wrote:I think that Tuilagi at 13 made Ford / Farrell look really good today too…

Much better than Slade outside them trying to play that role
Yep. Never seemed we quite worked out the correct role for Slade at 13. Was starting to get there when paired with Tuilagi but that’s probably out the window. I’d like him in the bench covering midfield though.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9186
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Which Tyler »

Works well with JJ there as well mind...
Imagine that, carrying threats can be useful for playmakers?

Notnthat I mind it, but I still prefer the ideas of:
Ford, Slade, Manu/JJ
Ford, Manu, JJ/Slade
Too late now though, and Ford Farrell Manu/JJ has worked too well, though I still have concerns about pairing Farrell and Manu in defence
Last edited by Which Tyler on Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
padprop
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by padprop »

Also agree on Tuilagi adding balance to Ford and Farrell. Slade or Joseph running those hardlines just doesn't free up the back three like Tuilagi running them, and neither are unable to carry on that hard line either. Worrying thing is if Tuilagi gets injured there's no like for like replacement, with Teo now nowhere to be seen.

Tuilagi has quickly probably become more most important player going into the world cup.
User avatar
SerjeantWildgoose
Posts: 2162
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by SerjeantWildgoose »

Spiffy wrote:We was robbed !!
That bastard ref did for us, so he did.
Idle Feck
JellyHead
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:38 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by JellyHead »

Renniks wrote:
Mr Mwenda wrote:Mauls off a kick a different? Is that new?
Been the rule for quite a while
Is this the one on 62 minutes? I was trying to work out what was going on. Is it not a maul if you hold up the catcher?
p/d
Posts: 3827
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by p/d »

As SCW said. Farrell was the difference today.

Best shat his pants when he saw the Ice Man walk out
Renniks
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Renniks »

JellyHead wrote:
Renniks wrote:
Mr Mwenda wrote:Mauls off a kick a different? Is that new?
Been the rule for quite a while
Is this the one on 62 minutes? I was trying to work out what was going on. Is it not a maul if you hold up the catcher?
16.18 If a maul is formed immediately after a player has directly caught an opponent’s kick in open play, a scrum that is awarded for any of the above reasons will be to the team of the ball catcher.
padprop
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by padprop »

Renniks wrote:
JellyHead wrote:
Renniks wrote:
Been the rule for quite a while
Is this the one on 62 minutes? I was trying to work out what was going on. Is it not a maul if you hold up the catcher?
16.18 If a maul is formed immediately after a player has directly caught an opponent’s kick in open play, a scrum that is awarded for any of the above reasons will be to the team of the ball catcher.
Makes sense really. If you had a pinpoint boxkicker and a hugely strong winger you could just marshal your way down the field holding players up.
JellyHead
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:38 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by JellyHead »

Renniks wrote:
JellyHead wrote:
Renniks wrote:
Been the rule for quite a while
Is this the one on 62 minutes? I was trying to work out what was going on. Is it not a maul if you hold up the catcher?
16.18 If a maul is formed immediately after a player has directly caught an opponent’s kick in open play, a scrum that is awarded for any of the above reasons will be to the team of the ball catcher.
Thanks. Not a rule I knew.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14564
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Mellsblue »

p/d wrote:As SCW said. Farrell was the difference today.

Best shat his pants when he saw the Ice Man walk out
What the f**k.

Ah. I see what you did there.
Post Reply