Surely the maul has to do with England's inability to adapt to refs.
Eddie said he wanted street smarts and a real fighter as captain. And, well, he's not picked anyone smart as captain.
We consistently struggle to adapt to different interpretations of the regulations, which is why our teams do so well in the Prem but then fail in Europe (Sarries aside).
So what do Sarries have that we don't?
England’s Achilles heel
Moderator: Puja
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14562
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: England’s Achilles heel
Jackson WrayStom wrote:Surely the maul has to do with England's inability to adapt to refs.
Eddie said he wanted street smarts and a real fighter as captain. And, well, he's not picked anyone smart as captain.
We consistently struggle to adapt to different interpretations of the regulations, which is why our teams do so well in the Prem but then fail in Europe (Sarries aside).
So what do Sarries have that we don't?
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2459
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: England’s Achilles heelwh
While i agree, England do seem to persist without changing things, is failing to coadapt not just the same as losing?
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: England’s Achilles heelwh
I'd be slightly more accepting of our losses (or draws) if we changed how we were playing when we realised it wasn't going well…Mr Mwenda wrote:While i agree, England do seem to persist without changing things, is failing to coadapt not just the same as losing?