Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Banquo »

Awesome start
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Banquo »

This is such an average match
Renniks
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Renniks »

Banquo wrote:
Ludlam on for Billy. Who will play 8
Itoje?
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17694
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Puja »

And here's the first post-Billy scrum... Curry it is.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Banquo »

Cue JNGF
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Banquo »

Renniks wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Ludlam on for Billy. Who will play 8
Itoje?
Obvs silly me
Renniks
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Renniks »

So, now Daly has given us a good 40 minutes - what's the chances this is when EJ changes his mind on him…
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote: That’s what you concluded from our play? You don’t think there’s any connection with what is happening inside?
I agree Ford has had limited ball with which to impose himself but that should mean he treats what he does get as vital, not kick it away aimlessly or drop it. I would prefer him to stay on when Slade comes on but he is giving Jones an excuse to move Farrell to 10. I hate the thought of that.
Faz has had the ball in hand more than Ford, which says something. Now you could argue Ford needs to step in and take charge, but this twin fly half thing is confusing then today.

Ludlam on for Billy. Who will play 8
Curry.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Banquo »

Despite Fazs ineptness a decent ish try.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
I agree Ford has had limited ball with which to impose himself but that should mean he treats what he does get as vital, not kick it away aimlessly or drop it. I would prefer him to stay on when Slade comes on but he is giving Jones an excuse to move Farrell to 10. I hate the thought of that.
Faz has had the ball in hand more than Ford, which says something. Now you could argue Ford needs to step in and take charge, but this twin fly half thing is confusing then today.

Ludlam on for Billy. Who will play 8
Curry.
even I worked that out after 2 scrums :)
Danno
Posts: 2583
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Danno »

Miles seems to be channelling Eddie Butler today
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Galfon »

Good quick switching by Eng..the brutish 10 charges over.
Eng 22 - 3 Arg , Con Faz
47 mins.
Arg missing tackles now.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17694
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Puja »

switchskier wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Tackle with player off the ground.
Not dangerous tho
Isn't there an argument that he took a player in the air and didn't return him safely to the ground? For the record I think it was sensible reffing and the right decision but with some other refs it would have been yellow and that's an issue.
As I shouted at Clive Woodward at half-time, it's only a yellow for a tackle in the air if they land on their back. The Argentine landed on his feet, so there's absolutely no grounds for a yellow.

Puja
Backist Monk
Insouciant
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:15 am

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Insouciant »

That steal from Itoje and the kick from Ford. We're definitely not slacking off now we have a bonus point.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by 16th man »

Good to see that Youngs has been hooked. Awful first half. You'd think the amount he kicks he'd be better at it, and the two tap and go penalties were just brain dead.

Exercise in hoping no one else gets hurt now.
Insouciant
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:15 am

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Insouciant »

Ford's kicking this half.. damn
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Oakboy »

Ford heard me at HT. That's more like it.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Banquo »

Not sure why every man free on the outside is being ignored?
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Galfon »

Eng 25 - 3 Arg
Pen Faz, 54 mins.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:Ford heard me at HT. That's more like it.
New 9 mate :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17694
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Puja »

16th man wrote:Good to see that Youngs has been hooked. Awful first half. You'd think the amount he kicks he'd be better at it, and the two tap and go penalties were just brain dead.

Exercise in hoping no one else gets hurt now.
The second tap penalty would've been a try if Nigel hadn't called it back for his own ineffable reasons. That was a great decision!

The rest of it, I completely agree with.

Puja
Backist Monk
Renniks
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Renniks »

Pretty sure that the huge change in kicking for Ford (going for touch instead of straight down the middle) is a tactical change - I don't understand the kick down the middle as a tactic though
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Stom »

Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:Ford heard me at HT. That's more like it.
New 9 mate :lol: :lol:
lol. But he is slow as fook. Better that than being slow of mind and thought, though.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Stom »

Renniks wrote:Pretty sure that the huge change in kicking for Ford (going for touch instead of straight down the middle) is a tactical change - I don't understand the kick down the middle as a tactic though
England's defence is so hard to get through, they're confident Argentina will just kick it back again, which either leads to a counterattacking opportunity or a l/o to us.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17694
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Eng - Arg: Match Thread

Post by Puja »

I think we ought to remove the entire front row. We cannot afford to lose any of them to injury and this is the perfect opportunity to get game time into the legs of Mako.

Puja
Backist Monk
Post Reply