IMO Hooper’s been the best flanker in world rugby since Mccaw retired.He’s got the kind of big carrying game that Mitchell claims Curry has too - though I’m less than convinced on that myself tbh.Spiffy wrote:Why not crazy about Hooper? For several years he has been one of the world's best 7s, and probably the most consistent. This guy empties the tank every time he plays, punches way above his weigh, has the gas of a centre, is tremendously competitive and is a hard nut. First man on the Oz team sheet for me, including Pocock.Raggs wrote:Not convinced that their opposite numbers are necessarily better, just different. I'm not crazy about Hooper, but he does allow Pocock to work. Pocock is very very good at what he does, but not much else. If you can't neutralise him, you'll struggle, but given the ref, and how his tournament has gone so far, I think we'll be OK. I guess I might take Hooper over one of our two, but that would be looking at balance. Just waiting on Jack Willis to rightfully take his place thoughBanquo wrote:Cool- but as I said, I think we've only ever run that system with the Ford/Faz axis, unless I'm misremembering the 6N with Faz/Manu/Slade?
Think that is the game right there in the back row; whether underhill and Curry can sufficiently neutralise their frankly better oppos, but the front five will help enormously- big role for Itoje and lawes..
Funnily enough though Read and Savea are good at what they do, kiwi back row doesn’t look that imposing compared to illustrious predecessors. Cane looks solid rather than spectacular at 7.