
Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Moderator: Puja
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Has Kvesic dropped his trousers in the bar again? After last season's form I thought he might be first choice. It does not pay to be versatile.
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Exeter's system is geared toward 2 big guys and a little one. Simmonds is ahead of Kvesic, rightly I'd suggest, so that's what it is.Oakboy wrote:Has Kvesic dropped his trousers in the bar again? After last season's form I thought he might be first choice. It does not pay to be versatile.
I'd love to see Simmonds launching off the back of England's pack, tbh, even though our flankers are "lightweight".
-
- Posts: 5984
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Yeah - that’s exactly my interpretation. Kvesic is fine hanging off the back of Exeter’s mauls and is better over the ball, but Simmonds adds so much more to their attacking options.
It’s good to see Townsend and Roko back and it’ll be interesting to see Hogg in the Premiership.
It’s good to see Townsend and Roko back and it’ll be interesting to see Hogg in the Premiership.
-
- Posts: 12155
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
It would be worth it alone just to see JNGF lose his mind if we fielded 6. Curry 7. Underhill 8. Simmonds.Stom wrote:Exeter's system is geared toward 2 big guys and a little one. Simmonds is ahead of Kvesic, rightly I'd suggest, so that's what it is.Oakboy wrote:Has Kvesic dropped his trousers in the bar again? After last season's form I thought he might be first choice. It does not pay to be versatile.
I'd love to see Simmonds launching off the back of England's pack, tbh, even though our flankers are "lightweight".
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Ah, with Kvesic on the bench. I get it.Mikey Brown wrote:
It would be worth it alone just to see JNGF lose his mind if we fielded 6. Curry 7. Underhill 8. Simmonds.

-
- Posts: 5896
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Neither side exactly shone last week so it will be interesting to see how this one goes.
Its good to see a couple of long term absentees back.
I'm sure Kvesic on the bench is part of Exe's rotation policy. He's bound to get plenty of game time over the season, so the odd bench spot shouldnt be seen as a demotion.
Its good to see a couple of long term absentees back.
I'm sure Kvesic on the bench is part of Exe's rotation policy. He's bound to get plenty of game time over the season, so the odd bench spot shouldnt be seen as a demotion.
-
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:58 am
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
I'd love Simmonds as our back row bench option for England. He's made for it. Can cover 7 and 8 and is such a wonderful impact option.Stom wrote:Exeter's system is geared toward 2 big guys and a little one. Simmonds is ahead of Kvesic, rightly I'd suggest, so that's what it is.Oakboy wrote:Has Kvesic dropped his trousers in the bar again? After last season's form I thought he might be first choice. It does not pay to be versatile.
I'd love to see Simmonds launching off the back of England's pack, tbh, even though our flankers are "lightweight".
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14564
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Yep. Him or Clifford. Explosive ball carrier, bit of jackal and able to cover all three positions. Just need to keep them fit.TheDasher wrote:I'd love Simmonds as our back row bench option for England. He's made for it. Can cover 7 and 8 and is such a wonderful impact option.Stom wrote:Exeter's system is geared toward 2 big guys and a little one. Simmonds is ahead of Kvesic, rightly I'd suggest, so that's what it is.Oakboy wrote:Has Kvesic dropped his trousers in the bar again? After last season's form I thought he might be first choice. It does not pay to be versatile.
I'd love to see Simmonds launching off the back of England's pack, tbh, even though our flankers are "lightweight".
-
- Posts: 2583
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
I may have spotted a teeny flaw in the plan. Feels like he's never strung five matches together without something major happening to him.Mellsblue wrote:Yep. Him or Clifford. Explosive ball carrier, bit of jackal and able to cover all three positions. Just need to keep them fit.TheDasher wrote:I'd love Simmonds as our back row bench option for England. He's made for it. Can cover 7 and 8 and is such a wonderful impact option.Stom wrote:
Exeter's system is geared toward 2 big guys and a little one. Simmonds is ahead of Kvesic, rightly I'd suggest, so that's what it is.
I'd love to see Simmonds launching off the back of England's pack, tbh, even though our flankers are "lightweight".
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9186
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Or MercerMellsblue wrote:Yep. Him or Clifford. Explosive ball carrier, bit of jackal and able to cover all three positions. Just need to keep them fit.TheDasher wrote:I'd love Simmonds as our back row bench option for England. He's made for it. Can cover 7 and 8 and is such a wonderful impact option.Stom wrote:
Exeter's system is geared toward 2 big guys and a little one. Simmonds is ahead of Kvesic, rightly I'd suggest, so that's what it is.
I'd love to see Simmonds launching off the back of England's pack, tbh, even though our flankers are "lightweight".
Or Kvesic
Or Willis
Or...
We have an embarassment of potential in the backrow - it will be interesting to see hwo makes it, who's never given a chance to make it, who makes it at club level but fails to translate, and who simply fails to live up to his early promise.
Thankfully, we've got enough coming through (and established but young) to be able to afford our usual squandering of talent.
Last edited by Which Tyler on Fri Oct 25, 2019 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
It's damn unluckyDanno wrote:I may have spotted a teeny flaw in the plan. Feels like he's never strung five matches together without something major happening to him.Mellsblue wrote:Yep. Him or Clifford. Explosive ball carrier, bit of jackal and able to cover all three positions. Just need to keep them fit.TheDasher wrote:
I'd love Simmonds as our back row bench option for England. He's made for it. Can cover 7 and 8 and is such a wonderful impact option.

Willis covers all 3 slots. I'd have him in the 23 for sure. He's a beast. Hot damn, we're going to struggle to fit them all in.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14564
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Not sure Willis is quite the ball carrier like those two. That said, I’m too busy eulogising over his 20 turnovers a match to look at his carrying.Stom wrote:It's damn unluckyDanno wrote:I may have spotted a teeny flaw in the plan. Feels like he's never strung five matches together without something major happening to him.Mellsblue wrote: Yep. Him or Clifford. Explosive ball carrier, bit of jackal and able to cover all three positions. Just need to keep them fit.He did string a nice bunch of matches for Quins last season but then pre-season comes along and boom, he's out again.
Willis covers all 3 slots. I'd have him in the 23 for sure. He's a beast. Hot damn, we're going to struggle to fit them all in.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14564
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Once Billy retires early to be a plumber, I’d love Mercer to cement the no8 spot.Which Tyler wrote:Or MercerMellsblue wrote:Yep. Him or Clifford. Explosive ball carrier, bit of jackal and able to cover all three positions. Just need to keep them fit.TheDasher wrote:
I'd love Simmonds as our back row bench option for England. He's made for it. Can cover 7 and 8 and is such a wonderful impact option.
Or Kvesic
Or Willis
Or...
We have an embarassment of potential in the backrow - it will be interesting to see hwo makes it, who's never given a chance to make it, who makes it at club level but fails to translate, and who simply fails to live up to his early promise.
Thankfully, we've got enough coming through (and established but young) to be able to afford our usual squandering of talent.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9186
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9186
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
I have no idea where the try line is
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9186
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
A certain sense of inevitability about that
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Cuthbert is the slowest quick person in Premiership rugby
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9186
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
He did well, Zach did better.Peej wrote:Cuthbert is the slowest quick person in Premiership rugby
Of and compulsory "Nowell is slower" comment
-
- Posts: 5984
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Definitely one for the purists ... not the most entertaining 80mins
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9186
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
I was entertained.Scrumhead wrote:Definitely one for the purists ... not the most entertaining 80mins
Sets things up nicely for a huge breakfast and a huger match in the morning.
-
- Posts: 5896
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Weather really put paid to any kind of rugby being played.
Credit to Bath who did well to arrive at h/t level and ground out a win. Exe look a bit out of sorts to me, but that can easily change.
Credit to Bath who did well to arrive at h/t level and ground out a win. Exe look a bit out of sorts to me, but that can easily change.
-
- Posts: 3280
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Yeah well done to bath. That was a proper shit fest of a game though. After watching these world cup matches that felt like going back in time to the 80's or some thing. Does the rec have any sort of drainage under the pitch?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9186
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Bath vs Exeter Friday 7.45 pm
Top class.twitchy wrote:Yeah well done to bath. That was a proper shit fest of a game though. After watching these world cup matches that felt like going back in time to the 80's or some thing. Does the rec have any sort of drainage under the pitch?
But there's only so much you can do when the grass is about 1/2 inch above the water table.
Planned new stadium raises the pitch