Team for France
Moderator: Puja
- Puja
- Posts: 17706
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Team for France
Go on then, I'll start. Anyone know when the England team is named/squad is whittled down?
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9197
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Team for France
Usually Thursday lunchtimePuja wrote:Go on then, I'll start. Anyone know when the England team is named/squad is whittled down?
Puja
-
- Posts: 2514
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
- Location: Haute-Garonne
Re: Team for France
With a Sunday kick-off, maybe Friday midday?
My French pals are strangely quiet this time, no pre match banter. Either they are feeling quietly confident with their young team or are scared stiff of an impending thrashing!
I can't decide which!
My French pals are strangely quiet this time, no pre match banter. Either they are feeling quietly confident with their young team or are scared stiff of an impending thrashing!
I can't decide which!
-
- Posts: 5897
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Team for France
Team is announced on Friday. I don't anticipate anything remotely adventurous.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6380
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team for France
I suppose it will be Farrell at 12 unfortunately. Will it be Youngs or Heinz at 9 (there's a bloody choice!)? Will Marler start? Might LCD get the 2 shirt? Where will Lawes play?
I am struggling to get excited about it, unfortunately.
I am struggling to get excited about it, unfortunately.
-
- Posts: 2514
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
- Location: Haute-Garonne
Re: Team for France
We’ve just about got used to Farrell being shoe-horned into the team somewhere. Why not at 8?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9197
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Team for France
1. Marler
2. George
3. Sinckler
4. Itoje
5. Kruis
6. Lawes
7. Underhill
8. Curry
9. Youngs
10. Farrell (c)
11. May
12. Tuilagi
12. Joseph
14. Watson
15. Daly
16. Cowan-Dickie; 17. MVunipola; 18. Williams; 19. Launchbury; 20. Ludlam
21. Heinz; 22. Ford; 23. Devoto
2. George
3. Sinckler
4. Itoje
5. Kruis
6. Lawes
7. Underhill
8. Curry
9. Youngs
10. Farrell (c)
11. May
12. Tuilagi
12. Joseph
14. Watson
15. Daly
16. Cowan-Dickie; 17. MVunipola; 18. Williams; 19. Launchbury; 20. Ludlam
21. Heinz; 22. Ford; 23. Devoto
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Team for France
This was a real chance to capture the imagination after the WC final. A chance to bring through some of the exciting youngsters into a core group of experienced players. A chance to get excited about a WC cycle from the get-go.
And we have an ultra-conservative squad with no 8 man.
We're going to see...
Mako, George, Sinckler
Itoje, Kruis
Lawes, Curry, Underhill
Youngs, Ford
May, Farrell, Tuilagi, Watson
Daly
LCD, Marler, Williams, Ewels, Ludlam, Heinz, Devoto, Thorley
And we have an ultra-conservative squad with no 8 man.
We're going to see...
Mako, George, Sinckler
Itoje, Kruis
Lawes, Curry, Underhill
Youngs, Ford
May, Farrell, Tuilagi, Watson
Daly
LCD, Marler, Williams, Ewels, Ludlam, Heinz, Devoto, Thorley
-
- Posts: 2514
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
- Location: Haute-Garonne
Re: Team for France
Will Eddie find a place for the excellent Ted Hill? (instead of Lawes at 6, for example?!)
-
- Posts: 12158
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Team for France
What's Joseph's form like? I'm really tempted by the idea of Devoto and Tuilagi together.
Not that Manu really has any form to speak of either.
Not that Manu really has any form to speak of either.
-
- Posts: 19152
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team for France
He’s been playing ok, no more. What’s devotos like’?Mikey Brown wrote:What's Joseph's form like? I'm really tempted by the idea of Devoto and Tuilagi together.
Not that Manu really has any form to speak of either.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Team for France
Who are you talking about specifically to ‘capture the imagination’? Other than Dombrandt there’s no (available) young player left out that is reasonably going to challenge the first choice 23.Stom wrote:This was a real chance to capture the imagination after the WC final. A chance to bring through some of the exciting youngsters into a core group of experienced players. A chance to get excited about a WC cycle from the get-go.
And we have an ultra-conservative squad with no 8 man.
We're going to see...
Mako, George, Sinckler
Itoje, Kruis
Lawes, Curry, Underhill
Youngs, Ford
May, Farrell, Tuilagi, Watson
Daly
LCD, Marler, Williams, Ewels, Ludlam, Heinz, Devoto, Thorley
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6380
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team for France
I'd be surprised if you were far wrong - unfortunately.Stom wrote:This was a real chance to capture the imagination after the WC final. A chance to bring through some of the exciting youngsters into a core group of experienced players. A chance to get excited about a WC cycle from the get-go.
And we have an ultra-conservative squad with no 8 man.
We're going to see...
Mako, George, Sinckler
Itoje, Kruis
Lawes, Curry, Underhill
Youngs, Ford
May, Farrell, Tuilagi, Watson
Daly
LCD, Marler, Williams, Ewels, Ludlam, Heinz, Devoto, Thorley
IMO, Jones should have cleared out some from the age/future viewpoint: Kruis, Youngs, Heinz.
He should have learned lessons: 1. Start with Marler for a solid set-piece and use Mako against tiring opposition, 2. Put Daly back on the wing with Watson at FB, 3. Bite the bullet on the 10 shirt and give up on Farrell at 12.
-
- Posts: 12158
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Team for France
Good from what I've seen. I wouldn't say I've followed any of the midfield contenders enough to say for certain, but the only one I've seen anything encouraging from recently in attack is Devoto. He seems to have some time on the ball and be able to make breaks or carry in traffic when required.Banquo wrote:He’s been playing ok, no more. What’s devotos like’?Mikey Brown wrote:What's Joseph's form like? I'm really tempted by the idea of Devoto and Tuilagi together.
Not that Manu really has any form to speak of either.
A 12 who can run, kick and pass would be nice, but no idea what he'll look like at this level.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Team for France
I would have no issue with some fresh blood at SH, but it is reasonable to point out that there’s nobody exactly demanding inclusion at the moment. Who would you have picked?Oakboy wrote:I'd be surprised if you were far wrong - unfortunately.Stom wrote:This was a real chance to capture the imagination after the WC final. A chance to bring through some of the exciting youngsters into a core group of experienced players. A chance to get excited about a WC cycle from the get-go.
And we have an ultra-conservative squad with no 8 man.
We're going to see...
Mako, George, Sinckler
Itoje, Kruis
Lawes, Curry, Underhill
Youngs, Ford
May, Farrell, Tuilagi, Watson
Daly
LCD, Marler, Williams, Ewels, Ludlam, Heinz, Devoto, Thorley
IMO, Jones should have cleared out some from the age/future viewpoint: Kruis, Youngs, Heinz.
He should have learned lessons: 1. Start with Marler for a solid set-piece and use Mako against tiring opposition, 2. Put Daly back on the wing with Watson at FB, 3. Bite the bullet on the 10 shirt and give up on Farrell at 12.
You would have got rid of Kruis because you don’t rate him, not because of he’s too old. He’s 29 and at his peak, no reason to bin him off because of age.
On the scrum, imo there’s too much fixation on the one game against SA. Only SA could do that to our scrum. Outside of that game we’ve had a very solid scrum setpiece for ages, both with and without Mako.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6380
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team for France
I'd have picked Johnny Hill, Dombrandt, Simmonds, Robson and Spencer. The two SHs need a season at 9/21 and sod the consequences. We have to move on, IMO.Timbo wrote:
I would have no issue with some fresh blood at SH, but it is reasonable to point out that there’s nobody exactly demanding inclusion at the moment. Who would you have picked?
You would have got rid of Kruis because you don’t rate him, not because of he’s too old. He’s 29 and at his peak, no reason to bin him off because of age.
On the scrum, imo there’s too much fixation on the one game against SA. Only SA could do that to our scrum. Outside of that game we’ve had a very solid scrum setpiece for ages, both with and without Mako.
I'd leave Kruis out because he's said he's off to Japan at the end of the season.
The SA game just proved the point for me. I've advocated starting Marler ever since he came back in (even IF I was in a minority of one!!!

- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14565
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team for France
My viable but optimistic team:
1. Mako
2. George
3. Sinckler
4. Lawes (assuming Kruis is off to Japan)
5. Itoje
6. Curry
7. Underhill
8. Earl (the optimistic bit)
9. Who cares
10. Ford
11. Daly
12. Farrell
13. Tuilagi
14. May
15. Watson
LCD, Genge, Stuart, Launchbury, Hill, Who cares, Joseph, Thorley
1. Mako
2. George
3. Sinckler
4. Lawes (assuming Kruis is off to Japan)
5. Itoje
6. Curry
7. Underhill
8. Earl (the optimistic bit)
9. Who cares
10. Ford
11. Daly
12. Farrell
13. Tuilagi
14. May
15. Watson
LCD, Genge, Stuart, Launchbury, Hill, Who cares, Joseph, Thorley
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Team for France
Kruis hasn’t said anything yet as far as I’m aware? Just rumours at this stage I thought.Oakboy wrote:I'd have picked Johnny Hill, Dombrandt, Simmonds, Robson and Spencer. The two SHs need a season at 9/21 and sod the consequences. We have to move on, IMO.Timbo wrote:
I would have no issue with some fresh blood at SH, but it is reasonable to point out that there’s nobody exactly demanding inclusion at the moment. Who would you have picked?
You would have got rid of Kruis because you don’t rate him, not because of he’s too old. He’s 29 and at his peak, no reason to bin him off because of age.
On the scrum, imo there’s too much fixation on the one game against SA. Only SA could do that to our scrum. Outside of that game we’ve had a very solid scrum setpiece for ages, both with and without Mako.
I'd leave Kruis out because he's said he's off to Japan at the end of the season.
The SA game just proved the point for me. I've advocated starting Marler ever since he came back in (even IF I was in a minority of one!!!
Yeah, I’m sanguine about the likes of Jonny Hill over Moon/Ewels or Simmonds over Earl/Ludlam....all perfectly good options and you’ve got to allow a coach a little bit of leeway given he has access to info we don’t.
I’m slightly regretful over Dombrandt, as he seems a freakish and exciting talent.
I’d have a horses for courses selection policy with Mako and Marler, but also conscious of the fact that really want to get Genge more involved as he looks like his game has gone up a notch since the World Cup. Genge will also be at his peak in 2023.
-
- Posts: 5984
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Team for France
I’ve also argued in the past for a horses for courses approach at loosehead. Mako is the better player, but against the better scrummaging sides, I prefer only one of Mako and Sinckler to start. Marler is a far better alternative than any of our tightheads after Sinckler, so I’m totally fine with him starting and Mako coming on as an impact sub.Oakboy wrote:I'd have picked Johnny Hill, Dombrandt, Simmonds, Robson and Spencer. The two SHs need a season at 9/21 and sod the consequences. We have to move on, IMO.Timbo wrote:
I would have no issue with some fresh blood at SH, but it is reasonable to point out that there’s nobody exactly demanding inclusion at the moment. Who would you have picked?
You would have got rid of Kruis because you don’t rate him, not because of he’s too old. He’s 29 and at his peak, no reason to bin him off because of age.
On the scrum, imo there’s too much fixation on the one game against SA. Only SA could do that to our scrum. Outside of that game we’ve had a very solid scrum setpiece for ages, both with and without Mako.
I'd leave Kruis out because he's said he's off to Japan at the end of the season.
The SA game just proved the point for me. I've advocated starting Marler ever since he came back in (even IF I was in a minority of one!!!
Against France, I’m not sure Bamba is the type of threat that warrants swapping out Mako though.
I’d go with:
1. Mako
2. George
3. Sinckler
4. Itoje
5. Kruis
6. Curry
7. Underhill
8. Earl
9. Youngs

10. Ford
11. May
12. Farrell
13. Tuilagi
14. Daly
15. Watson
16. Cowan-Dickie 17. Marler 18. Williams 19. Lawes 20. Ludlam 21. Heinz 22. Devoto 23. Thorley
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Team for France
Mako
George
Sinckler
Itoje
Kruis
Hill
Underhill
Curry
Youngs
Ford
May
Devoto
Tuilagi
Watson
Daly
LCD
Genge
Stuart
Ewels
Earl
Beans
Farrell
Thorley
I'd like though to find a place for Joseph, and still more to have some other options at 8 and 9
George
Sinckler
Itoje
Kruis
Hill
Underhill
Curry
Youngs
Ford
May
Devoto
Tuilagi
Watson
Daly
LCD
Genge
Stuart
Ewels
Earl
Beans
Farrell
Thorley
I'd like though to find a place for Joseph, and still more to have some other options at 8 and 9
- Puja
- Posts: 17706
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Team for France
Why Daly at 15, out of interest? Surely now is the ideal time to end the doomed experiment?Digby wrote:Mako
George
Sinckler
Itoje
Kruis
Hill
Underhill
Curry
Youngs
Ford
May
Devoto
Tuilagi
Watson
Daly
LCD
Genge
Stuart
Ewels
Earl
Beans
Farrell
Thorley
I'd like though to find a place for Joseph, and still more to have some other options at 8 and 9
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 12158
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Team for France
Agreed on Daly. Give someone else a go there.
I know it’s the wrong Curry brother but I think this game is the right time to try him at scrumhalf.
So I’m going for-
1. Marler
2. George
3. Sinkler
4. Itoje
5. Kruis
6. Hill
7. Underhill
8. Earl
9. Curry
10. Ford
11. Daly
12. Devoto
13. Tuilagi
14. Watson
15. May I guess?
LCD, Mako, Williams, Lawes, Ludlum/Seymour/Saull, Heinz, Farrell, Thorley
I know it’s the wrong Curry brother but I think this game is the right time to try him at scrumhalf.
So I’m going for-
1. Marler
2. George
3. Sinkler
4. Itoje
5. Kruis
6. Hill
7. Underhill
8. Earl
9. Curry
10. Ford
11. Daly
12. Devoto
13. Tuilagi
14. Watson
15. May I guess?
LCD, Mako, Williams, Lawes, Ludlum/Seymour/Saull, Heinz, Farrell, Thorley
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Team for France
I'm not averse to trying someone else. Though I'm also not sold he's failed there or anyone is obviously betterPuja wrote:Why Daly at 15, out of interest? Surely now is the ideal time to end the doomed experiment?Digby wrote:Mako
George
Sinckler
Itoje
Kruis
Hill
Underhill
Curry
Youngs
Ford
May
Devoto
Tuilagi
Watson
Daly
LCD
Genge
Stuart
Ewels
Earl
Beans
Farrell
Thorley
I'd like though to find a place for Joseph, and still more to have some other options at 8 and 9
Puja
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Team for France
Obviously, the team I'd pick would include players Eddie hasn't picked. But it'd probably look something like...
Mako
George
Sinckler
Itoje
Lawes
Curry
Underhill
Dombrandt
Robson
Ford
May
Devoto
Joseph
Daly
Watson
Thacker, Genge, Stuart, Ewels, THill, Mitchell, Smith, Tuilagi
Mako
George
Sinckler
Itoje
Lawes
Curry
Underhill
Dombrandt
Robson
Ford
May
Devoto
Joseph
Daly
Watson
Thacker, Genge, Stuart, Ewels, THill, Mitchell, Smith, Tuilagi