And in worse news admissions for things like heart attacks are way way down, which means people aren't getting the much simpler treatment now following chest pains and we're just storing up problemsBanquo wrote:Meanwhile, intensive care outcomes look pretty bad- not sure if there is a comparator out there? It could well be folks are being admitted too late.
COVID19
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: COVID19
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: COVID19
I'm guessing there's quite a number of things about South Korea you wouldn't like. My impression isn't that you're over on the right of the Tory party with the likes of MoggSon of Mathonwy wrote:Okay, we disagree.Mellsblue wrote:You’ve repeatedly misunderstood my posts or just ignored points.Son of Mathonwy wrote: Look, if you said I'd misunderstood one of your posts, I'd read it.
If you want to have an honest discussion, my post is near the bottom of page 12.
I am having an honest discussion. It’s not really been possible when you continue to insist all countries have exactly the same issues when battling the spread of the disease, despite this not being the case, when you jump to definite conclusions despite us being at the very start of this fight and using the Chinese Communist Party as some some sort of model to follow.
I’ll leave it here.
My feeling is that you are refusing to draw any conclusions which suggest we could be doing things substantially better, regardless of the evidence, because of some differences between the UK (or the West) and South Korea. China is a redherring, since everything I'm arguing for is being done by democratic South Korea.
I’ll leave it here.
-
- Posts: 19053
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: COVID19
yep, I mentioned that before, ditto strokes. There will be some upside with people not wasting others time in a and e and with GPs. Also in order to clear beds, all electives have been cancelled, so there will be a huge backlog in eg hip replacements and many other areas. It'll take a long, long time to catch up.Digby wrote:And in worse news admissions for things like heart attacks are way way down, which means people aren't getting the much simpler treatment now following chest pains and we're just storing up problemsBanquo wrote:Meanwhile, intensive care outcomes look pretty bad- not sure if there is a comparator out there? It could well be folks are being admitted too late.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: COVID19
Paediatrics & Ante-natal units too - the fear factor with Covid is having real ripple-out impact on lives.Digby wrote: And in worse news admissions for things like heart attacks are way way down, which means people aren't getting the much simpler treatment now following chest pains and we're just storing up problems
-
- Posts: 19053
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: COVID19
Its not just fear factor though, its folks trying to be more responsible about using the NHS. One hopes that both continues and is balanced out a bit.Galfon wrote:Paediatrics & Ante-natal units too - the fear factor with Covid is having real ripple-out impact on lives.Digby wrote: And in worse news admissions for things like heart attacks are way way down, which means people aren't getting the much simpler treatment now following chest pains and we're just storing up problems
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14552
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: COVID19
In so many sectors of society. The effects of this will be us for a very long time.Banquo wrote:It'll take a long, long time to catch up.
- morepork
- Posts: 7524
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: COVID19
I think we could if compelled. There are randomized blinded clinical trials going on right now.Son of Mathonwy wrote:We're never going to be able to do double-blind, randomized controlled studies on this. As you say, a little unethical. We can only do our best to get comparable numbers. If we don't make some assumptions it will be impossible to compare anything.morepork wrote:Ideally, in a cold hearted clinical context we would like to plot total deaths for this time of year against deaths during the onset of community virus spread (again differences in testing are a confound) in a population that has resisted social distancing. An unethical experiment variable yes, but it would sort the argument out. Would require transparency in normal data. All this globalism and no reliable commonly accessible data base. We really do fuck ourselves with the long fetid dick of the free market don’t we?
- morepork
- Posts: 7524
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10483
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: COVID19
It’s fair to call South Korea a democracy, but it’s not that long ago that it was a very authoritarian state and democracy isn’t as built in as it is in other countries. Add to that their experience from SARS and you have a populace who don’t need much convincing.Digby wrote:I'm guessing there's quite a number of things about South Korea you wouldn't like. My impression isn't that you're over on the right of the Tory party with the likes of MoggSon of Mathonwy wrote:Okay, we disagree.Mellsblue wrote: You’ve repeatedly misunderstood my posts or just ignored points.
I am having an honest discussion. It’s not really been possible when you continue to insist all countries have exactly the same issues when battling the spread of the disease, despite this not being the case, when you jump to definite conclusions despite us being at the very start of this fight and using the Chinese Communist Party as some some sort of model to follow.
I’ll leave it here.
My feeling is that you are refusing to draw any conclusions which suggest we could be doing things substantially better, regardless of the evidence, because of some differences between the UK (or the West) and South Korea. China is a redherring, since everything I'm arguing for is being done by democratic South Korea.
I’ll leave it here.
Even now in the UK there are people who suggest the lockdown is causing more damage that covid would. An earlier shutdown may not have had the public support that the governments current policy has.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14552
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: COVID19
That’s very informative, thank you. My biggest take, and there’s loads to take from that, is that your response is all about balancing the effects of your actions. Everything you do has a negative and a positive, it’s a case of weighing it all up and making a decision as best you can. It also proves that this ain’t over until the geeks in the labs work their magic.morepork wrote:https://www.pnas.org/content/104/18/7582
All that said, I’m not sure that a report authored by Dick Hatchett and published by pnas isn’t just a massive wind up.
- morepork
- Posts: 7524
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: COVID19
Mellsblue wrote:That’s very informative, thank you. My biggest take, and there’s loads to take from that, is that your response is all about balancing the effects of your actions. Everything you do has a negative and a positive, it’s a case of weighing it all up and making a decision as best you can. It also proves that this ain’t over until the geeks in the labs work their magic.morepork wrote:https://www.pnas.org/content/104/18/7582
All that said, I’m not sure that a report authored by Dick Hatchett and published by pnas isn’t just a massive wind up.
How old are you?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14552
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: COVID19
Clearly, not old enough.morepork wrote:Mellsblue wrote:That’s very informative, thank you. My biggest take, and there’s loads to take from that, is that your response is all about balancing the effects of your actions. Everything you do has a negative and a positive, it’s a case of weighing it all up and making a decision as best you can. It also proves that this ain’t over until the geeks in the labs work their magic.morepork wrote:https://www.pnas.org/content/104/18/7582
All that said, I’m not sure that a report authored by Dick Hatchett and published by pnas isn’t just a massive wind up.
How old are you?
- morepork
- Posts: 7524
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: COVID19
Just couldn't help slipping it in could you.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14552
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: COVID19
Just as long as I withdraw it early enough.
- morepork
- Posts: 7524
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: COVID19
With my user name and the direction of these puns, your withdrawal could be argued casting pearls before swine.
Too much?
Too much?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14552
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: COVID19
Given I love (I’m keeping this typo) in N Yorkshire my fellow little Englanders will not be surprised of my need to withdraw from farm stock.
- morepork
- Posts: 7524
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: COVID19
I bet you tell all the pigs that.
- morepork
- Posts: 7524
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: COVID19
Banquo wrote:Get a sty, boys
Spit roast?
There’s plenty of room hon.
- morepork
- Posts: 7524
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: COVID19
Good skilz Brazil:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-52251342
Meanwhile on Friday, President Bolsonaro hit the streets of the capital Brasília, drawing crowds and greeting followers. In his latest act of disregard for his own government's recommendations of social distancing, he took pictures with supporters and shook hands.
What a wanker.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-52251342
Meanwhile on Friday, President Bolsonaro hit the streets of the capital Brasília, drawing crowds and greeting followers. In his latest act of disregard for his own government's recommendations of social distancing, he took pictures with supporters and shook hands.
What a wanker.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: COVID19
It could be in the reporting - odd.(just 17 in a day)Sandydragon wrote: After being held up as an alternative, Sweden is looking like there could be problems there..

-
- Posts: 19053
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: COVID19
cheerfully declinedmorepork wrote:Banquo wrote:Get a sty, boys
Spit roast?
There’s plenty of room hon.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: COVID19
After all the above which frankly as a bunch of statements I think anyone would find hard to swallow there's some good news, parliament is on the way back, it'll be going virtual from 21st April
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10483
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: COVID19
Wish I’d bought shares in Zoom.Digby wrote:After all the above which frankly as a bunch of statements I think anyone would find hard to swallow there's some good news, parliament is on the way back, it'll be going virtual from 21st April
Maybe speaking one at a time and having to put a hand up for the speaker to allow them to speak will create a less childish parliament.
We can but hope.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: COVID19
Looks like we've finally found something other that dairy-based primary produce and Rugby Union Football to be good at:

______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================