Jack Nowell at Openside Experiment?

Moderator: Puja

fivepointer
Posts: 5897
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Jack Nowell at Openside Experiment?

Post by fivepointer »

Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:Almost certainly England missed out there, looked a test player in every way bar actually getting a real chance to show what he could do. Which for a while wasn't his fault, nor England's with all those injuries, but then he was just overlooked for a weirdly long period of time
Yep, people trot out that he was always crocked, but there was a long period where he wasn't and was overlooked. I do remember he was brought into the squad a few times prior to that, and inevitably dropped out. But plenty of other players were given almost infinite injury tolerance.
He was brilliant in the 2002 AI's and would have made the RWC squad, imo, but got glandular fever :(
Thats my recollection too. He wasnt always injured but simply wasnt picked when he was available.

Great waste of a talent.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12157
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Jack Nowell at Openside Experiment?

Post by Mikey Brown »

Yeah, his match list is quite odd to look at. 10 matches across 5 years.

http://en.espn.co.uk/statsguru/rugby/pl ... view=match

Cueto was good, but looking at those teams you feel like he would have seen off Varndell, Voyce and a late 2000s Cohen if there were any justice in the world.
twitchy
Posts: 3281
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Jack Nowell at Openside Experiment?

Post by twitchy »

JSD is the matt le tissier of rugby.
Banquo
Posts: 19152
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Jack Nowell at Openside Experiment?

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:Almost certainly England missed out there, looked a test player in every way bar actually getting a real chance to show what he could do. Which for a while wasn't his fault, nor England's with all those injuries, but then he was just overlooked for a weirdly long period of time
Yep, people trot out that he was always crocked, but there was a long period where he wasn't and was overlooked. I do remember he was brought into the squad a few times prior to that, and inevitably dropped out. But plenty of other players were given almost infinite injury tolerance.
He was brilliant in the 2002 AI's and would have made the RWC squad, imo, but got glandular fever :(
If he'd hadn't had the glandular fever, then he'd have played the 6N, then the RWC and his place in the team would've been secure. Instead, he came back in 2014, halfway through the 6N, as a player with 2 caps, behind the RWC trio of Lewsey, Robinson, and Cohen. Then when he did get a start, it was on the injury ridden disaster tour of NZ in a misfiring team, where he got blamed for it all, and Robinson could revert to size conquering all. Poor sod.

Puja
yep
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6378
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Jack Nowell at Openside Experiment?

Post by Oakboy »

Was it a Barbarians game where he hung the ball out as temptation and then ran round the defender like he was set in stone?
Banquo
Posts: 19152
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Jack Nowell at Openside Experiment?

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:Was it a Barbarians game where he hung the ball out as temptation and then ran round the defender like he was set in stone?
yep, it was Lomu I think he went round
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Jack Nowell at Openside Experiment?

Post by Stom »

Danno
Posts: 2595
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Jack Nowell at Openside Experiment?

Post by Danno »

That was brilliant but the first thing I saw was the SH whipping the ball away from scrum like lightning
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Jack Nowell at Openside Experiment?

Post by Digby »

Does one whip the ball away like lightning only to have it drop around the shins of the receiver? I have to say I've always enjoyed watching Percy in that passage of play, for a defender to sell his inside and outside defenders down the river like that takes some doing, no communication, no responsibility, no tackle, allowances needed both for it being a scratch side and the off chance they'd been out on the piss, but I can see why he was hidden at the back defending like that
Post Reply