Petti might well be the better player but not what we needed. We needed the 20 stone monster more. Tigers pack was too lightweight and needed more aggression. Ideally we'd have got both of them but I guess we didn't have room under the cap for that as we've signed Enever this summer who is pretty cost effective.Scrumhead wrote:I’m with Spiffy. Guido Petti is a far better player IMO. I can’t say I’ve ever been impressed by Lavanini. He’s more notable for his all too regular (and deliberate) foul play than anything positive he contributes.
Despite Lavanini's reputation as I've pointed out before, no reds and no citings since he joined Tigers. Quite frankly Tigers have had players branded thugs before and a few of them were there when England won the 2003 world cup. You don't win by being nice. If anything I want Lavanini to get a little more fired up, start intimidating his opposite number. Tom Youngs has absolutely no worries dealing out some on field justice and whilst I don't want Lavanini to go quite that far there's nothing wrong with leaning on his reputation to make the opposition think twice.