Fewest surnames XXIII

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17715
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Puja »

16th man wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Puja wrote:Curry/Curry, Willis/Willis, Vunipola/Vunipola, Simmonds/Simmonds - can't get away from brothers angling for England honours.

Puja
And possibly two unrelated Moons, if the stars align
With a few of Hills knocking around too.

What do we reckon is the fewest number of surnames we'd need for a viable 23 from current players?

I recognise that having the Youngs brothers might save us one by getting a 2 and 9 combo, but even in a pointless nusing like this I'd rather rule out that horror at all costs.
1. MVunipola
2. TTaylor
3. HWilliams
4. JHill
5. THill
6. BCurry
7. TCurry
8. JWillis

9. BYoungs
10. MVunipola
11. JCokanasiga
12. SHill
13. SJames
14. PCokanasiga
15. LJames

16. TYoungs
17. BMoon
18. PHill
19. AMoon
20. TWillis
21. BVunipola
22. HTaylor
23. JWilliams


Yes, I know 16thM said no Youngses, but it's much harder to do without them.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19164
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Banquo »

Maunders?
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by 16th man »

Going to admit I was too lazy to do this myself, but knew there'd be a few regulars who couldn't resist setting up a thread on it
Last edited by 16th man on Mon Sep 28, 2020 12:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17715
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Puja »

16th man wrote:Going to admit I was too lazy to do this myself, but knew there's be a few regulars who couldn't resist setting up a thread on it
It's this or working!
Banquo wrote:Maunders?
Both scrum-halves unfortunately, so won't actually help. Same issue as for the Burnses.

Puja
Backist Monk
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by 16th man »

Possibly the obly time I'll lament Tom Francis choosing Wales, as otherwise he and Piers Francis could be the prop and backs subs.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Stom »

Will Stuart at prop and Sam Stuart the Newcastle SH on the bench
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Stom »

You’ve only chosen 1 Simmonds, though
FKAS
Posts: 8419
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by FKAS »

Harry and for the time Johnny Williams. Clutching at straws completely you could then also go for Matt Williams the Worcester EQ backrow/hooker.

Or Tommy Taylor hooker and Henry Taylor scrum half.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Stom »

And if Simmonds missses out, therefore you could put Jack Walker at 2 and Charlie Walker at 15 (he's played there (badly)).

Which would leave us with:

Vunipola
Walker
Stuart
Hill
Hill
Curry
Curry
Willis
Youngs
Vunipola
Cokanasiga
Hill
James
Walker
James

Youngs
Moon
Hill
Moon
Willis
Vunipola
Stuart
Cokanasiga

10 names.

But 2 Championship players...
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Stom »

FKAS wrote:Harry and for the time Johnny Williams. Clutching at straws completely you could then also go for Matt Williams the Worcester EQ backrow/hooker.

Or Tommy Taylor hooker and Henry Taylor scrum half.
Taylors a good shout.

Could then dump the Youngses :D
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17715
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote:You’ve only chosen 1 Simmonds, though
Don't bring facts into this!

Had the same problem with this as with any EQP selection - too many back rows!

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5840
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Stom »

Puja wrote:
Stom wrote:You’ve only chosen 1 Simmonds, though
Don't bring facts into this!

Had the same problem with this as with any EQP selection - too many back rows!

Puja
And too few 9s.

Though surprisingly, a veritable forest of 12s!
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by 16th man »

Stom wrote:
FKAS wrote:Harry and for the time Johnny Williams. Clutching at straws completely you could then also go for Matt Williams the Worcester EQ backrow/hooker.

Or Tommy Taylor hooker and Henry Taylor scrum half.
Taylors a good shout.

Could then dump the Youngses :D
Which is the most important thing.
Banquo
Posts: 19164
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Banquo »

Watsons ? Shame the Armitages have retired (?)

ETA Steffon still playing, Delon coaching, and think Guy also still about
Last edited by Banquo on Mon Sep 28, 2020 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Beasties
Posts: 1311
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Beasties »

Once we've sorted this out we could dodge work by trying to get Samoa down to about three or four?
FKAS
Posts: 8419
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by FKAS »

Beasties wrote:Once we've sorted this out we could dodge work by trying to get Samoa down to about three or four?
Stretch that to a PI team and let's go.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9206
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Which Tyler »

This is a silly thread.
The Welsh always win!
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17715
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Puja »

Beasties wrote:Once we've sorted this out we could dodge work by trying to get Samoa down to about three or four?
The Welsh you could do with 2 - Davies and Jones.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14568
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Mellsblue »

Puja wrote:
Beasties wrote:Once we've sorted this out we could dodge work by trying to get Samoa down to about three or four?
The Welsh you could do with 2 - Davies and Jones.

Puja
Are we still discussing rugby or have we moved on to gene pool?
FKAS
Posts: 8419
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by FKAS »

Mellsblue wrote:
Puja wrote:
Beasties wrote:Once we've sorted this out we could dodge work by trying to get Samoa down to about three or four?
The Welsh you could do with 2 - Davies and Jones.

Puja
Are we still discussing rugby or have we moved on to gene pool?
Well one does someone correlate to the other. Not quite as much these days though given the national teams tendency to cap any import as soon as possible.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12161
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Mikey Brown »

Jngf wrote:Billy Vunipola is already shaped like a front-rower so get him in at hooker.

Also I see you've selected Ben Curry at 6. I just don't think he's got the physicality or the line-out presence to play there. Particularly not with a lightweight like Hill at lock. Is Simon Shaw still playing for Toulon? Has he got a brother?

What are people's thoughts on the merits of a more traditional pairing of a fetching, linking openside with a tough, grafting blindside. Two opensides together is just unnatural. I don't want to say it's wrong, but I don't think it's the way god intended.
Give it a rest already.
Banquo
Posts: 19164
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by Banquo »

Mikey Brown wrote:
Jngf wrote:Billy Vunipola is already shaped like a front-rower so get him in at hooker.

Also I see you've selected Ben Curry at 6. I just don't think he's got the physicality or the line-out presence to play there. Particularly not with a lightweight like Hill at lock. Is Simon Shaw still playing for Toulon? Has he got a brother?

What are people's thoughts on the merits of a more traditional pairing of a fetching, linking openside with a tough, grafting blindside. Two opensides together is just unnatural. I don't want to say it's wrong, but I don't think it's the way god intended.
Give it a rest already.
Good work
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1571
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: Fewest surnames XXIII

Post by jngf »

Banquo wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:
Jngf wrote:Billy Vunipola is already shaped like a front-rower so get him in at hooker.

Also I see you've selected Ben Curry at 6. I just don't think he's got the physicality or the line-out presence to play there. Particularly not with a lightweight like Hill at lock. Is Simon Shaw still playing for Toulon? Has he got a brother?

What are people's thoughts on the merits of a more traditional pairing of a fetching, linking openside with a tough, grafting blindside. Two opensides together is just unnatural. I don't want to say it's wrong, but I don't think it's the way god intended.
Give it a rest already.
Good work
So much for GDPR Jngf - but as they say plagiarism is the greatest form of flattery :)
Post Reply