Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

First time weve not resourced the breakdown well
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Galfon »

Lawrence has made a solid contribution - seems a good fit for this gameplan.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

Fck me that was stupid between George and Youngs. Empty headed
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12172
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Mikey Brown »

Banquo wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:Watching Daly still being a 4/10 on fullback basics when his attacking play isn't clicking is really uninspiring. We're lucky to be able to get away with it.
Not sure how you can criticise his attacking play tbh. We haven’t done much
I'm not sure I was especially. He's had it a couple of times and crashed it up or hoofed it away. I just meant it's weird to still see his position/tackling/fielding shown up when there's no attacking threat on show to gloss over the basics.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by 16th man »

Not entirely sure what George and Youngs were doing with that maul.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

Galfon wrote:Lawrence has made a solid contribution - seems a good fit for this gameplan.
Yes, looks at home. Switching positions around in attack and defence isn’t easy.
Danno
Posts: 2627
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Danno »

Fucking Youngs
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

Mikey Brown wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:Watching Daly still being a 4/10 on fullback basics when his attacking play isn't clicking is really uninspiring. We're lucky to be able to get away with it.
Not sure how you can criticise his attacking play tbh. We haven’t done much
I'm not sure I was especially. He's had it a couple of times and crashed it up or hoofed it away. I just meant it's weird to still see his position/tackling/fielding shown up when there's no attacking threat on show to gloss over the basics.
Hardly his fault was my point
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Galfon »

Time for 'bomb'-squad ?..
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by 16th man »

England starting to fray a bit on the edges now. Sharpness has gone and mistakes creeping in.
Danno
Posts: 2627
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Danno »

Banquo wrote:
Galfon wrote:Lawrence has made a solid contribution - seems a good fit for this gameplan.
Yes, looks at home. Switching positions around in attack and defence isn’t easy.
Barely seen Slade. Not surprising given who's inside but still
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

This is the sort of slipshod lapse in concentration we have to avoid
Danno
Posts: 2627
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Danno »

16th man wrote:England starting to fray a bit on the edges now. Sharpness has gone and mistakes creeping in.
Yeah, must be time to switch some of the forwards. We must be up to 150+ tackles
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by 16th man »

I'm told Itoje doesn't win turnovers anymore....
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

Brilliant by Itoje- not entirely legal imo.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Galfon »

Good test for Eng defence, after well-set maul.
Passed.
switchskier
Posts: 2303
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by switchskier »

16th man wrote:I'm told Itoje doesn't win turnovers anymore....
Not a chance in hell that he was bearing his weight there. Blatant and poor refereeing
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

16th man wrote:I'm told Itoje doesn't win turnovers anymore....
Well and that we have no one who is interested in jackaling.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

Interesting subs. Robson on
User avatar
Mr Mwenda
Posts: 2461
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Mr Mwenda »

Danno wrote:
16th man wrote:England starting to fray a bit on the edges now. Sharpness has gone and mistakes creeping in.
Yeah, must be time to switch some of the forwards. We must be up to 150+ tackles
The disparity between the two teams total tackles is ridiculous.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

Faz has been an idiot all game
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Galfon »

Blatant blocking Faz - world class (block, that is)
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12172
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Mikey Brown »

On that note I'd love to see Underhill's dominant hit stats.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

It’s penalties giving Ireland any momentum
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Galfon »

Another test..
Post Reply