EQP by position

Moderator: Puja

p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by p/d »

Just throw a few quid to Wasps and draft Barbeary straight in at 12
TheNomad
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:19 am

Re: EQP by position

Post by TheNomad »

Raggs wrote:Think Simonds has played a bit at 12 (and 15).
You'd think that Simmonds (J) could play at 12 - he's like Farrell, only quicker and better at kicking

With the right time there - so in particular he could develop his understanding of defense in the position - I reckon he could be brilliant.

And he's probably our best kicker too
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: EQP by position

Post by Stom »

TheNomad wrote:
Raggs wrote:Think Simonds has played a bit at 12 (and 15).
You'd think that Simmonds (J) could play at 12 - he's like Farrell, only quicker and better at kicking

With the right time there - so in particular he could develop his understanding of defense in the position - I reckon he could be brilliant.

And he's probably our best kicker too
Could pair him with Smith, then. Get the best of both worlds.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: EQP by position

Post by Raggs »

TheNomad wrote:
Raggs wrote:Think Simonds has played a bit at 12 (and 15).
You'd think that Simmonds (J) could play at 12 - he's like Farrell, only quicker and better at kicking

With the right time there - so in particular he could develop his understanding of defense in the position - I reckon he could be brilliant.

And he's probably our best kicker too
Baxter will keep him at 10 then.
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3426
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Raggs wrote:
TheNomad wrote:
Raggs wrote:Think Simonds has played a bit at 12 (and 15).
You'd think that Simmonds (J) could play at 12 - he's like Farrell, only quicker and better at kicking

With the right time there - so in particular he could develop his understanding of defense in the position - I reckon he could be brilliant.

And he's probably our best kicker too
Baxter will keep him at 10 then.

He'd be mad not to.
fivepointer
Posts: 5908
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by fivepointer »

Converting a 10 is an idea, or how about a winger to 12? Gordon D'arcy made a very successful switch some years ago for Ireland so it can be done.
We've seen Wasps use Odogwu at 13 - jury still out on that one - but is there anyone else out there who might have the skillset to adjust to a new role?
Jack Nowell seems an obvious candidate but are there others.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: EQP by position

Post by Stom »

fivepointer wrote:Converting a 10 is an idea, or how about a winger to 12? Gordon D'arcy made a very successful switch some years ago for Ireland so it can be done.
We've seen Wasps use Odogwu at 13 - jury still out on that one - but is there anyone else out there who might have the skillset to adjust to a new role?
Jack Nowell seems an obvious candidate but are there others.
For 12?

Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.

Of all the back 3 players who could make a fist of 12...

Brown could have. Goode could have.

Mallinder obviously has played plenty at 12. Not sure there's anyone else I'd want to see there who has played in the back 3. I mean, Thorley would do well I reckon, but you'd just negate his biggest assets. Simmons could, perhaps, but he's small and has only just (re)converted. Coka possibly, but his brother already plays there.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9247
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: EQP by position

Post by Which Tyler »

Stom wrote:For 12?

Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.

Of all the back 3 players who could make a fist of 12...

Brown could have. Goode could have.

Mallinder obviously has played plenty at 12. Not sure there's anyone else I'd want to see there who has played in the back 3. I mean, Thorley would do well I reckon, but you'd just negate his biggest assets. Simmons could, perhaps, but he's small and has only just (re)converted. Coka possibly, but his brother already plays there.
If you're looking for a current back3 player to shift to 2, then Mallinder and DeGlanville would be the obvious choices - both of whom converted to the back 3 from FH (same goes for Goode - I'm not convinced that Brown could have though)
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12172
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by Mikey Brown »

It’s between Sam Simmonds, Alfie Barbeary and Tom Youngs for me.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: EQP by position

Post by Stom »

Which Tyler wrote:
Stom wrote:For 12?

Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.

Of all the back 3 players who could make a fist of 12...

Brown could have. Goode could have.

Mallinder obviously has played plenty at 12. Not sure there's anyone else I'd want to see there who has played in the back 3. I mean, Thorley would do well I reckon, but you'd just negate his biggest assets. Simmons could, perhaps, but he's small and has only just (re)converted. Coka possibly, but his brother already plays there.
If you're looking for a current back3 player to shift to 2, then Mallinder and DeGlanville would be the obvious choices - both of whom converted to the back 3 from FH (same goes for Goode - I'm not convinced that Brown could have though)
TdG is a good call, actually. Think he'd be good there.

But yeah, Mikey nails it: SSimmonds or Barbeary.
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by p/d »

Stom wrote: For 12?

Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.



Brown could have.
That just made me smile
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: EQP by position

Post by Mellsblue »

p/d wrote:
Stom wrote: For 12?

Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.



Brown could have.
That just made me smile
Ha!
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: EQP by position

Post by Digby »

Why would Mike 'Die With the Ball' Brown not have had enough hands to play centre for England?
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17730
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by Puja »

In his defence, his hands were pretty decent in close quarters. It was out wide where he got his reputation from always looking at a defensive line and believing that he stood a better chance of breaking it than the man outside him.

Puja
Backist Monk
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: EQP by position

Post by Digby »

His hands were bad, but not as amusing as the trait he had for a long time of kicking the ball back if it was kicked to his left and running it back were it kicked to his right, rarely does one see a supposed test standard player so consistently respond like one of Pavlov's dogs
FKAS
Posts: 8458
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by FKAS »

Stom wrote:
fivepointer wrote:Converting a 10 is an idea, or how about a winger to 12? Gordon D'arcy made a very successful switch some years ago for Ireland so it can be done.
We've seen Wasps use Odogwu at 13 - jury still out on that one - but is there anyone else out there who might have the skillset to adjust to a new role?
Jack Nowell seems an obvious candidate but are there others.
For 12?

Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.

Of all the back 3 players who could make a fist of 12...

Brown could have. Goode could have.

Mallinder obviously has played plenty at 12. Not sure there's anyone else I'd want to see there who has played in the back 3. I mean, Thorley would do well I reckon, but you'd just negate his biggest assets. Simmons could, perhaps, but he's small and has only just (re)converted. Coka possibly, but his brother already plays there.
Most international centres worth their salt would have run straight through him at 12. Goode would have had to bulk up substantially to play there and that might have killed his footwork.

Young Freddie Steward could be a candidate to move from 15 to 12 but seems a bit of a waste when he's so good under the high ball and has an absolute cannon of a right foot. Built like an athletic lock or blindside he's a good defender and can throw a big pass.

Pop Sam Simmonds in there. Explosive ball carrying, big tackles and offloads. Hybrid player time.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by 16th man »

And so another thread trends inexorably towards the conclusion that all that matters is getting back rowers on the pitch....
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3426
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Or converting people to 12 on, well, I'm not sure what criteria. Thorley, Cokanasiga, Brown, Steward :D :D :D :D
Danno
Posts: 2627
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by Danno »

Epaminondas Pules wrote:Or converting people to 12 on, well, I'm not sure what criteria. Thorley, Cokanasiga, Brown, Steward :D :D :D :D
After over a decade of mediocre 12s we've all become a bit desperate :(
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17730
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by Puja »

Danno wrote:
Epaminondas Pules wrote:Or converting people to 12 on, well, I'm not sure what criteria. Thorley, Cokanasiga, Brown, Steward :D :D :D :D
After over a decade of mediocre 12s we've all become a bit desperate :(
Tbh, if you offered me a peak Brad Barritt right now, I would take your hand off at the wrist.

Puja
Backist Monk
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by p/d »

Puja wrote:
Danno wrote:
Epaminondas Pules wrote:Or converting people to 12 on, well, I'm not sure what criteria. Thorley, Cokanasiga, Brown, Steward :D :D :D :D
After over a decade of mediocre 12s we've all become a bit desperate :(
Tbh, if you offered me a peak Brad Barritt right now, I would take your hand off at the wrist.

Puja
Indeed
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: EQP by position

Post by Digby »

'Tis an interesting thing to look at a side struggling for fluency in attack and conclude Barritt is any part of an acceptable answer. Why not just say you'd take Burgess back while you're at it? (obviously supposing the wide beating hadn't happened, as is he shouldn't be in anyone's side)
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17730
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by Puja »

Digby wrote:'Tis an interesting thing to look at a side struggling for fluency in attack and conclude Barritt is any part of an acceptable answer. Why not just say you'd take Burgess back while you're at it? (obviously supposing the wide beating hadn't happened, as is he shouldn't be in anyone's side)
That's a terrible comparison. Barritt ran decent lines, was decent on the crash ball, had solid enough hands, and was great in defence. Not an all-star by any means, but he'd certainly be a good foil to Slade at 13. Whereas [redacted] was getting to be a decent flanker before he ran home to mummy, but had still had no idea where to stand or what to do in the centre and made up for it by being big and having tonnes and tonnes of "character".

Puja
Backist Monk
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12172
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by Mikey Brown »

Yup, Barritt was not often the spark of life needed between Farrell and Tuilagi in the Burt era, but between Ford and Slade/Joseph I think he could have offered something. Realistically though when was his peak? Has he actually retired yet? He's one of those guys who will probably always be capable of turning in the odd performance through sheer grit, but his body must be feeling it.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17730
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: EQP by position

Post by Puja »

Mikey Brown wrote:Yup, Barritt was not often the spark of life needed between Farrell and Tuilagi in the Burt era, but between Ford and Slade/Joseph I think he could have offered something. Realistically though when was his peak? Has he actually retired yet? He's one of those guys who will probably always be capable of turning in the odd performance through sheer grit, but his body must be feeling it.


Puja
Backist Monk
Post Reply