On the plus side, he did say the inside centre should pass. That's a huge step forward.Sandydragon wrote:Don't worry folks, the players are to blame and they will be replaced for Saturday.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugb ... d-11469786
Chiefs v Wales
Moderator: Sandydragon
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Chiefs v Wales
- stud muffin
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Ohhh ffs...I thought this was tomorrow morning!
It looks like Wales did too.
It looks like Wales did too.
- Numbers
- Posts: 2495
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Not surprised by the result, I am surprised by the margin.
What annoys me most about this is that we have been using players needed for the second test and we didn't take enough players to start off with, the numbers have never made any sense, maybe someone needs to get an abacus to Gatland.
What annoys me most about this is that we have been using players needed for the second test and we didn't take enough players to start off with, the numbers have never made any sense, maybe someone needs to get an abacus to Gatland.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Chiefs v Wales
You had possession close to our line but apparently no clue how to close it out. To be fair the Chiefs defence was rabid.Sandydragon wrote:I didn't watch the game, but I kept getting updates via an app. The suggestion was that we had plenty of opportunities to score tries, but failed to do so, other then from a driving maul from a lineout. At one point, the commentary mentioned that we looked clueless with ball in hand.
Can someone who actually sat through the game confirm if that is accurate?
The telling point for me was just after half time when Wales remained in possession but went from our line back to the 22.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10499
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Ive just read the Fail writeup which mentions 3 wasted scoring opportunities due to selfish play. FFS.Lizard wrote:You had possession close to our line but apparently no clue how to close it out. To be fair the Chiefs defence was rabid.Sandydragon wrote:I didn't watch the game, but I kept getting updates via an app. The suggestion was that we had plenty of opportunities to score tries, but failed to do so, other then from a driving maul from a lineout. At one point, the commentary mentioned that we looked clueless with ball in hand.
Can someone who actually sat through the game confirm if that is accurate?
The telling point for me was just after half time when Wales remained in possession but went from our line back to the 22.
- Sourdust
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Chiefs v Wales
So, what went right?
* Priestland looked quite sharp in patches.
* We bossed the scrum... until we stopped getting scrums.
* Eli Walker played for 80 minutes without breaking anything.
* Nobody insulted the Maori ancestors, accidentally killed a spectator, or contracted bubonic plague.
* I had to be up early anyway.
* Fuck it.
* Priestland looked quite sharp in patches.
* We bossed the scrum... until we stopped getting scrums.
* Eli Walker played for 80 minutes without breaking anything.
* Nobody insulted the Maori ancestors, accidentally killed a spectator, or contracted bubonic plague.
* I had to be up early anyway.
* Fuck it.
-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:16 pm
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Chiefs v Wales
yeah, that could have gone better...
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10499
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Given Gatlands comments in the fail, the chances of Priestland getting anything more than a cameo appearance are pretty slim. Shame really as he looks a bit more like his old self.Sourdust wrote:So, what went right?
* Priestland looked quite sharp in patches.
* We bossed the scrum... until we stopped getting scrums.
* Eli Walker played for 80 minutes without breaking anything.
* Nobody insulted the Maori ancestors, accidentally killed a spectator, or contracted bubonic plague.
* I had to be up early anyway.
* Fuck it.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Gatland says:
"They were a lot better than us in attack and defence and that was disappointing."
You can't teach that sort of wisdom. It's natural.
"They were a lot better than us in attack and defence and that was disappointing."
You can't teach that sort of wisdom. It's natural.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:16 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Weren't the Chiefs missing 20-odd players as well? 20! What are you doing Wales... in fairness, not many teams would do well against the Chiefs, but a decimated chiefs vs a supposed top tier national team, ouchy!
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
In what areas were the Chiefs better?
That big green area out there
That big green area out there
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
I really can't believe that the lesson he took from that game when interviewed by Sky was that you had to win more collisions. For the sake of Welsh Rugby he's got to go.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Oh and if he coaches the Lions, he'll make SCW's tour seem like paradise.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I really can't believe that the lesson he took from that game when interviewed by Sky was that you had to win more collisions. For the sake of Welsh Rugby he's got to go.
Wawwen is a bit of a Neanderthal like that.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10499
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
From what I understand, we looked better when Jamie Roberts was on the field doing his thing. The problem with Warrenball is that its so dependent on Roberts getting over the gain line followed by a fast clear out.
In 05 we played harum scarum rugby which was nothing if not entertaining. We needed to get a more physical edge since it was too easy to shut us down via the forwards, as teams quickly learned to do. But we seem to have gone too far the other way. On Saturday, All Black locks were passing the ball better than our centers, yet in 05 we had our forwards pass the ball with ease and looking comfortable at basic skills like drawing the player rather than just running into contact.
With England rediscovering their forward power, their traditional strength, Im not convinced our power game is going to get us that far anymore, even in the NH. There were signs of adaptation on Saturday, but it feels like too little too late and I only think that they went down that road because they recognized that it was mission impossible, so bugger it we might as well try and play a bit of rugby.
Since we have extended Gatland's contract then the minimum must be a new attack and skills coach. If Gatland can't adapt to that, then it will be worth paying him off. The only snag is who is available/ I can't think of any top class international coaches who are currently out of work, whilst Welsh coaches have as many question marks over them as positives. Dat Young maybe if Wasps will let him go? I'd take Stephen Jones on board in an instant, but again, would the Scarlets be happy with that?
I have a horrible feeling that the next few years is going to be painful watching for us.
In 05 we played harum scarum rugby which was nothing if not entertaining. We needed to get a more physical edge since it was too easy to shut us down via the forwards, as teams quickly learned to do. But we seem to have gone too far the other way. On Saturday, All Black locks were passing the ball better than our centers, yet in 05 we had our forwards pass the ball with ease and looking comfortable at basic skills like drawing the player rather than just running into contact.
With England rediscovering their forward power, their traditional strength, Im not convinced our power game is going to get us that far anymore, even in the NH. There were signs of adaptation on Saturday, but it feels like too little too late and I only think that they went down that road because they recognized that it was mission impossible, so bugger it we might as well try and play a bit of rugby.
Since we have extended Gatland's contract then the minimum must be a new attack and skills coach. If Gatland can't adapt to that, then it will be worth paying him off. The only snag is who is available/ I can't think of any top class international coaches who are currently out of work, whilst Welsh coaches have as many question marks over them as positives. Dat Young maybe if Wasps will let him go? I'd take Stephen Jones on board in an instant, but again, would the Scarlets be happy with that?
I have a horrible feeling that the next few years is going to be painful watching for us.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Insightful, wasn't it. I had to read it a few times just to get my head round the complexities of the debrief. Once I managed to comprehend it I had to go for a lie down. Are we sure he's a Kiwi?morepork wrote:Gatland says:
"They were a lot better than us in attack and defence and that was disappointing."
You can't teach that sort of wisdom. It's natural.
- Puja
- Posts: 17679
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
I'd've thought Dai would come in an instant if you called. He'd be good for you too.Sandydragon wrote:Since we have extended Gatland's contract then the minimum must be a new attack and skills coach. If Gatland can't adapt to that, then it will be worth paying him off. The only snag is who is available/ I can't think of any top class international coaches who are currently out of work, whilst Welsh coaches have as many question marks over them as positives. Dat Young maybe if Wasps will let him go? I'd take Stephen Jones on board in an instant, but again, would the Scarlets be happy with that?
Actually, best you stick with Warren for a bit longer.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Chiefs players not considered for selection: Nepo Laulala, Mitchell Karpik, Johan Bardoul, Pauliasi Manu, Sam Henwood, Glen Fisiiahi, Chase Tiatia, Michael Leitch, Maama Vaipulu, James Tucker, Augustine Pulu (All Blacks Sevens) and Shaun Stevenson (New Zealand U20s).iLovett wrote:Weren't the Chiefs missing 20-odd players as well? 20! What are you doing Wales... in fairness, not many teams would do well against the Chiefs, but a decimated chiefs vs a supposed top tier national team, ouchy!
All Blacks: Charlie Ngatai, Brodie Rettalick, Sam Cane, Tawera Kerr-Barlow, Seta Tamanivalu, Nathan Harris, Aaron Cruden and Damian McKenzie
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Chiefs v Wales
On the other hand, the Chiefs did employ a sneaky, surprise Haka. They don't do that in Super Rugby matches.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
They played rugby too, which Wales were apparently not expecting. Cheeky buggers.Lizard wrote:On the other hand, the Chiefs did employ a sneaky, surprise Haka. They don't do that in Super Rugby matches.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5044
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Hell, yes, that sums it up. Business as usual for Wales. Without a spark of creativity (largely provided by Liam Williams on Saturday) we have no idea what to do with the ball. Ponderous and easy to defend.Sandydragon wrote:I didn't watch the game, but I kept getting updates via an app. The suggestion was that we had plenty of opportunities to score tries, but failed to do so, other then from a driving maul from a lineout. At one point, the commentary mentioned that we looked clueless with ball in hand.
Can someone who actually sat through the game confirm if that is accurate?
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Now that I've sobered up, I've realised that this result has probably F'd in the A any chance of future midweek tour matches, hasn't it?
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Certainly against Wales. We have a fairly active A team so don't need midweek fixtures so much, and haven't shown any inclination to retsart. Shame really.Lizard wrote:Now that I've sobered up, I've realised that this result has probably F'd in the A any chance of future midweek tour matches, hasn't it?
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10499
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Chiefs v Wales
Which is a bit of a shame really as I recall the SH teams touring Welsh clubs when I was growing up and they were a great opportunity. They seemed to have died a bit of a death since professionalism came along (except the Lions and even they play less fixtures than they used to).Lizard wrote:Now that I've sobered up, I've realised that this result has probably F'd in the A any chance of future midweek tour matches, hasn't it?
I don't think the issue is playing the games, the problem is taking a bit enough squad that players aren't playing 2.5 games or more in 8 days.