England v Scotland

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6415
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Oakboy »

Has Farrell overtaken Ford in the spiral-kicking contest? Funny how important some press pundits were saying that would be and now Jones has not even picked Ford.
Danno
Posts: 2673
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Danno »

Puja wrote:
Danno wrote:Wilson. Next.
You say that, but I think if the situation came up, Eddie would pick Curry. I don't necessarily know I'd disagree with him either - while his first few games showed striking inexperience in the role, his performances last year as one of England's big carriers has started to convince me that Eddie might've had a point.

Puja
You're probably right. I'd be happy with either, but Wilson has done a solid job there for us on a few occasions before
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12208
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Mikey Brown »

Oakboy wrote:Has Farrell overtaken Ford in the spiral-kicking contest? Funny how important some press pundits were saying that would be and now Jones has not even picked Ford.
Yeah I thought "spiral bomb" was going to be this years most irritating buzz word. Has it already gone out of fashion?
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6415
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Oakboy »

Mikey Brown wrote:
Oakboy wrote:Has Farrell overtaken Ford in the spiral-kicking contest? Funny how important some press pundits were saying that would be and now Jones has not even picked Ford.
Yeah I thought "spiral bomb" was going to be this years most irritating buzz word. Has it already gone out of fashion?
Let's hope so. Maybe the practice time allotted to it could be diverted to running/passing or something equally old-fashioned?
francoisfou
Posts: 2534
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
Location: Haute-Garonne

Re: England v Scotland

Post by francoisfou »

We surely won’t have a bum clencher like two years ago! If England doesn’t win by at least 20, I’m a Dutchman! (even with whatsisname at 10!)
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Raggs »

francoisfou wrote:We surely won’t have a bum clencher like two years ago! If England doesn’t win by at least 20, I’m a Dutchman! (even with whatsisname at 10!)
Why? We've got Farrell at 10, a newbie at 12, a guy who's not good enough at fullback. Relative newcomers at loosehead and tighthead too.

I'm vaguely confident of a win, but a 20+ point win sounds unlikely against Scotland at the best of times.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12208
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Mikey Brown »

Raggs wrote:
francoisfou wrote:We surely won’t have a bum clencher like two years ago! If England doesn’t win by at least 20, I’m a Dutchman! (even with whatsisname at 10!)
Why? We've got Farrell at 10, a newbie at 12, a guy who's not good enough at fullback. Relative newcomers at loosehead and tighthead too.

I'm vaguely confident of a win, but a 20+ point win sounds unlikely against Scotland at the best of times.
I’m not buying that.

I think with all this talk on the build up Russell is due an absolute howler anyway.
Danno
Posts: 2673
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Danno »

You're probably right on the money there, Mr Brown
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12208
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Mikey Brown »

I can’t believe someone at the BBC gets paid for writing this stuff.

“On Saturday, much will centre on Russell and Farrell.

The entertainer against the terminator. The mischief-maker against the commander-in-chief. The game-breaker against the results-grinder.”
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9322
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Which Tyler »

Mikey Brown wrote:I can’t believe someone at the BBC gets paid for writing this stuff.

“On Saturday, much will centre on Russell and Farrell.

The entertainer against the terminator. The mischief-maker against the commander-in-chief. The game-breaker against the results-grinder.”
No "the hot-blood against the ice-man"? :o

Thank heavens for small mercies, I guess
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1580
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by jngf »

Mikey Brown wrote:I can’t believe someone at the BBC gets paid for writing this stuff.

“On Saturday, much will centre on Russell and Farrell.

The entertainer against the terminator. The mischief-maker against the commander-in-chief. The game-breaker against the results-grinder.”
Thought Eddie Butler’s comment about their being no role models in rugby and had the game not existed some of these players would be in prison as their alternative occupation was interesting on many levels
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by 16th man »

What wouldn't you give for a scrum half at even 75% of Dupont's level? Then they put Serin on as a sub. It's really not fair.
User avatar
Mr Mwenda
Posts: 2461
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Mr Mwenda »

16th man wrote:What wouldn't you give for a scrum half at even 75% of Dupont's level? Then they put Serin on as a sub. It's really not fair.
I've liked Varney, too. I hope England are noting how Italy have broken the French defensive line.
Danno
Posts: 2673
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Danno »

Anyone else becoming exponentially more nervous about France? Italy are as shunt as I've seen them, but still...
User avatar
Mr Mwenda
Posts: 2461
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Mr Mwenda »

Danno wrote:Anyone else becoming exponentially more nervous about France? Italy are as shunt as I've seen them, but still...
After their 3rd team almost did for England I was always concerned. Thrashing an Italian team who lack a defence doesn't change that much. One would hope the French play will look less effortless now the others have analysed them.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by 16th man »

Danno wrote:Anyone else becoming exponentially more nervous about France? Italy are as shunt as I've seen them, but still...
Powerful pack, top class half backs, direct runners outside them. They look very dangerous.

I can't see us doing anything other than booting it long, hoping to suffocate them and take advantage of any discipline slips.
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1580
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by jngf »

People won’t like this but SCW is right about England need to play quicker, question is (May aside) can they?
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5845
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Stom »

jngf wrote:People won’t like this but SCW is right about England need to play quicker, question is (May aside) can they?
Stopped clock and all.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5845
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Stom »

16th man wrote:
Danno wrote:Anyone else becoming exponentially more nervous about France? Italy are as shunt as I've seen them, but still...
Powerful pack, top class half backs, direct runners outside them. They look very dangerous.

I can't see us doing anything other than booting it long, hoping to suffocate them and take advantage of any discipline slips.
I'll be honest, if Penaud continues to be on the bench, I'm a lot happier.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by 16th man »

jngf wrote:People won’t like this but SCW is right about England need to play quicker, question is (May aside) can they?
The players are capable of it. It's more a question of if they're told they can do it, or are just instructed to grind.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Digby »

16th man wrote:
jngf wrote:People won’t like this but SCW is right about England need to play quicker, question is (May aside) can they?
The players are capable of it. It's more a question of if they're told they can do it, or are just instructed to grind.
Also why is May the only one who can play quickly? Is there a new idea only fast players can play quickly?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7530
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by morepork »

Digby wrote:
16th man wrote:
jngf wrote:People won’t like this but SCW is right about England need to play quicker, question is (May aside) can they?
The players are capable of it. It's more a question of if they're told they can do it, or are just instructed to grind.
Also why is May the only one who can play quickly? Is there a new idea only fast players can play quickly?

You are like a philosophy teacher standing in for an ill English teacher.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5845
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Stom »

btw, Johnny Hill briefly had an OK haircut...what happened? Do all Exeter players drink from the inbred fountain or something? They're like cold Australians...
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4297
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: England v Scotland

Post by Galfon »

unlucky Itoje
loudnconfident
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:46 am

Re: England v Scotland

Post by loudnconfident »

The kit looks great at least
Post Reply