The Second Test

Moderator: Sandydragon

WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by WaspInWales »

NZ comfortably offside.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by WaspInWales »

Is it me or are Wales passing too early sometimes?
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by WaspInWales »

Lovely stuff!
zer0
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by zer0 »

WaspInWales wrote:Why doesn't Barrett start?
Because he can't kick. He also has a tendency to stand deep and shovel the ball sideways in SR. In other words, be the complete opposite of what he's been tonight.

Given that he only seems to play well off the bench, perhaps they should try subbing him on after five minutes. It would be as genius and unexpected as a backward cross field kick.
pompey-zebra
Posts: 589
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by pompey-zebra »

Lovely try! Too little too late but nicely taken none the less. Good conversion too.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by WaspInWales »

And another!
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by WaspInWales »

Not sure why it wasn't a penalty advantage for the one handed knock on though? Who cares though.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2307
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

WaspInWales wrote:Why doesn't Barrett start?
Goal kicking. Relative inexperience. Versatility off the bench. Arguably the best kiwi 10 this season isn't even in the match squad.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by WaspInWales »

2 minutes left....14 points for the draw?
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by WaspInWales »

Amazing finish if he got it down.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by WaspInWales »

In touch.
User avatar
oldbackrow
Posts: 281
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:46 pm
Location: Darkest Rotherham
Contact:

Re: The Second Test

Post by oldbackrow »

WaspInWales wrote:Not sure why it wasn't a penalty advantage for the one handed knock on though? Who cares though.
He called advantage over as the pass was made. A pity Wales didn't play like this at the start of the second half!
User avatar
joshfishkins
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:08 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by joshfishkins »

At times during that second half, NZ were amazing. 14 point loss is about 20 points better than I was fearing.

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
Buy my books. Feed my kids! Please.

http://tinyurl.com/z8deef3
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by WaspInWales »

oldbackrow wrote:
WaspInWales wrote:Not sure why it wasn't a penalty advantage for the one handed knock on though? Who cares though.
He called advantage over as the pass was made. A pity Wales didn't play like this at the start of the second half!
Aye, he was playing it as an accidental knock on but the Welsh player just stuck one hand out. That's usually a penalty advantage but doesn't matter.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: The Second Test

Post by Mellsblue »

WaspInWales wrote:Why doesn't Barrett start?
Kicking %.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by 16th man »

Greenwood actually has a point here. If the Welsh lineout functioned, there is an argument for @ a 20 point change in that score line.
User avatar
joshfishkins
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:08 pm

Re: RE: Re: The Second Test

Post by joshfishkins »

16th man wrote:Greenwood actually has a point here. If the Welsh lineout functioned, there is an argument for @ a 20 point change in that score line.
The line out has always been shite. As long as I can remember.

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
Buy my books. Feed my kids! Please.

http://tinyurl.com/z8deef3
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1984
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by Spiffy »

Hard for any team to play the ABs on that form. They are such a skillful and athletic team.
The Wales midfield triangle of Biggar/Roberts/Davies do look a bit short of pace and variation in attacking ideas.
Great tour for Liam Williams who played marvellously in both tests. Plus points for Falateau too.
User avatar
Len
Posts: 608
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by Len »

Plucky loss
User avatar
oldbackrow
Posts: 281
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:46 pm
Location: Darkest Rotherham
Contact:

Re: The Second Test

Post by oldbackrow »

You just hope for Wales' sake, Gatland takes what he has seen during part of the first half and the latter part of the second, and lets them play like that the rest of the time. It shows they can do more than just compete!
MrK
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:27 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by MrK »

Henson went from 10/15 to 12. COuld Patchell be the answer for us, thought he was good today for his first proper test.

Id like to see Dee and Dillon Lewis introduced for the AIs but for next week Id like Dacey as replacement Hooker.

Tom James for Amos, thats about as good as it will get I think
User avatar
Graigwen
Posts: 599
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:25 am

Re: The Second Test

Post by Graigwen »

Amos is an intelligent lad (medical student?) but often looks slow in thought on the pitch.
wayneha50
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:33 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by wayneha50 »

oldbackrow wrote:You just hope for Wales' sake, Gatland takes what he has seen during part of the first half and the latter part of the second, and lets them play like that the rest of the time. It shows they can do more than just compete!
would love to think that would be the case but it is Gatland we're talking about

Patchell would add some much needed intelligence & passing ability anywhere in the back line
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10499
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: The Second Test

Post by Sandydragon »

MrK wrote:Henson went from 10/15 to 12. COuld Patchell be the answer for us, thought he was good today for his first proper test.

Id like to see Dee and Dillon Lewis introduced for the AIs but for next week Id like Dacey as replacement Hooker.

Tom James for Amos, thats about as good as it will get I think
I've thought for a while that Patch could do well at centre.
Ross. S
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:59 pm
Location: Rhondda

Re: The Second Test

Post by Ross. S »

Warburton seems proud "we proved that we can compete for 80 minuets"

He mst have missed the first 20 of the second half when we were completely blown away then. Getting bored of the management speak and bullshit from certain players and the management team

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/36567708
Post Reply