Saints V Glos 2pm Sat

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Mr Mwenda
Posts: 2461
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am

Re: Saints V Glos 2pm Sat

Post by Mr Mwenda »

Judging by that failure to convert a 2 v 1, he's not the only one. Glos 13 did well, mind.
FKAS
Posts: 8472
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Saints V Glos 2pm Sat

Post by FKAS »

Adam_P wrote:No one should have got a yellow from that, literally nothing happened apart from 5 mins of wasted time watch replays of a group hug. Tempest loves to stop a game going doesn't he
Got to get his breath back somehow.

Dunno Proctor definitely moves his elbow back towards LRZ's face. It's not a strike but it's a little dig and we've all had it done to us. He knew what he was doing.

Seabrook's moment of madness looks like a godsend for Saints. They might yet get a LBP from this.
User avatar
Shiny
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
Location: Bradford

Re: Saints V Glos 2pm Sat

Post by Shiny »

The highs and lows of being a Saints fan.
The green, black and gold army.
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: Saints V Glos 2pm Sat

Post by Gloskarlos »

Decent enough from Glos, but Saints offered nothing. We should have won to nil.

This is the kind of game jngf needs to watch if he still believes Ludlam is international class. Ludlow ten times the player today.
fivepointer
Posts: 5915
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Saints V Glos 2pm Sat

Post by fivepointer »

Saints were utterly dreadful.
Glos wont mind a bit though. They worked hard in defence and got on top in the set pieces. Things turning around for them.
switchskier
Posts: 2303
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm

Re: Saints V Glos 2pm Sat

Post by switchskier »

Adam_P wrote:No one should have got a yellow from that, literally nothing happened apart from 5 mins of wasted time watch replays of a group hug. Tempest loves to stop a game going doesn't he
Stopping it relies on a game breaking out in the first place. That was turgid. Northamptons coaches have some questions to answer after that as there appeared to be no plan, no accuracy and not much drive. They're better players than that showed. Should have changed the props much earlier.

Gloucester a bit more cohesive but the piecemeal nature of the backline showed. 36 should not play ten, but Heinz was almost as culpable for preventing any decent hall getting to the backs. Slater a step above everyone on the field I thought.
Post Reply