Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by Gloskarlos »

15. Jason Woodward
14. Jonny May*
13. Billy Twelvetrees
12. Mark Atkinson
11. Ollie Thorley *
10. Adam Hastings
9. Ben Meehan


1. Harry Elrington
2. Jack Singleton
3. Kirill Gotovtsev
4. Freddie Clarke *
5. Andrew Davidson
6. Ruan Ackermann
7. Lewis Ludlow (c) *
8. Ben Morgan


16. Henry Walker *
17. Val Rapava-Ruskin
18. Jamal Ford-Robinson
19. Freddie Thomas *
20. Jack Clement *
21. Stephen Varney *
22. Lloyd Evans *
23. Chris Harris
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by Gloskarlos »

Warriors

15 Jamie Shillcock,
14 Noah Heward,
13 Ollie Lawrence,
12 Francois Venter,
11 Melani Nanai,
10 Owen Williams,
9 Willi Heinz (CC),
1 Ethan Waller,
2 Scott Baldwin,
3 Christian Judge,
4 Matt Garvey,
5 Justin Clegg,
6 Ted Hill (CC),
7 Sam Lewis,
8 Matt Kvesic.

Replacements | 16 Niall Annett, 17 Marc Thomas, 18 Jack Owlett, 19 Kyle Hatherell, 20 Sione Vailanu, 21 Will Chudley, 22 Billy Searle, 23 Oli Morris.
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by Gloskarlos »

Fearful mismatch at 13 in terms of pace. Lots of Glos old boys in that Wuss side, wonder how many feel they have a point to prove. Hastings first start at 10. Excited to see how that goes
fivepointer
Posts: 5922
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by fivepointer »

Wuss have started pretty well. They look settled and will have found a bit of confidence after the first 2 rounds. Glos struggling a bit but try scoring doesnt seem to be an issue.

This is a low key game that might be one of the better ones this weekend.
Tigersman
Posts: 1540
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 am

Re: Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by Tigersman »

Worcester should really beat Gloucester well imo.
Especially with Gloucester missing Balmain, Worcesters scrum been their clear weak point so far, Elrington did well last week I thought but Balmain is a big chunk of experience to have gone along with Slater.

Honestly don't get why Gloucester didn't keep hold of Garvey
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by Gloskarlos »

Good Glos win in dire conditions, Hastings shone at 10, great game. A few nice tries too, which considering how wet it was was a bonus. Hopefully that’s the monkey off their backs.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5999
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by Scrumhead »

Only saw the highlights, but Hastings looked very classy.
fivepointer
Posts: 5922
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by fivepointer »

Ted Hill copped a red for a tip but copped a foot in the throat directly before his challenge. Think the disciplinary panel are going to have to go through the tape frame by frame on that one.
FKAS
Posts: 8511
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by FKAS »

fivepointer wrote:Ted Hill copped a red for a tip but copped a foot in the throat directly before his challenge. Think the disciplinary panel are going to have to go through the tape frame by frame on that one.
I suspect the Glaws player will use the Barrett defence. The ref reviewed at the time and deemed it was due to leaning back presumably based in the recent Barrett decision. Ted Hill has no chance of getting off though there was a definite option for him not to tip but the red mist had come down and he knowingly dumped the guy. The hands went up after because he knew he'd made a mistake but he'll sit out a week or two. Handily missing the Tigers game.
User avatar
Gloskarlos
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by Gloskarlos »

Thought at the time they could both see red. The Barret outcome will be the incorrect precedent set I think.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5999
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by Scrumhead »

Yeah … bit of a difficult one. As FKAS said, he didn’t have to follow through with the tip, but that shouldn’t exonerate Evans for kicking out as he did.

Hill has very little (if any?) previous, so I’m not expecting a particularly lengthy ban.
FKAS
Posts: 8511
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Worcester V Glos Sat 3pm

Post by FKAS »

Gloskarlos wrote:Thought at the time they could both see red. The Barret outcome will be the incorrect precedent set I think.
Yeah I agree with Barrett precedent being a poor one but now it's in place I expect many clubs to cite it in incidents such as these.
Post Reply