Is this whole conversation talking about the 1 non-scrumhalf spot on a 6:2 bench now?Raggs wrote:He didn't know how to play union whether in the forwards or backs. A quick backrow spending time in the midfield isn't going to be the end of the world if required in an emergency. It's also why for me, whoever is in the 23 shirt, doesn't get on the pitch outside of injury, or 5 minutes left in the game.Danno wrote:If he or someone similar like Earl ever got the odd cameo there at their club I might be ok with the idea that they could do 10mins of a test in the centre, but on its own it's what happened with [redacted].Spiffy wrote:It might just work if an adventurous coach were willing to give a fast, powerful forward like Sam Simmonds a gallop at the opposition in midfield towards the end of the game, but don't see that as a deliberate tactic in the game plan.
The Ideal Bench
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 12201
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
-
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
Of course. Keep upMikey Brown wrote:Is this whole conversation talking about the 1 non-scrumhalf spot on a 6:2 bench now?Raggs wrote:He didn't know how to play union whether in the forwards or backs. A quick backrow spending time in the midfield isn't going to be the end of the world if required in an emergency. It's also why for me, whoever is in the 23 shirt, doesn't get on the pitch outside of injury, or 5 minutes left in the game.Danno wrote:
If he or someone similar like Earl ever got the odd cameo there at their club I might be ok with the idea that they could do 10mins of a test in the centre, but on its own it's what happened with [redacted].

-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
Give it a day or so and I'm sure it'll move onto if a backrower is able to cover centres and wing, so we can get Earls, Simmonds, Dombrandt and one of the Wasps brothers on the bench.Mikey Brown wrote:Is this whole conversation talking about the 1 non-scrumhalf spot on a 6:2 bench now?Raggs wrote:He didn't know how to play union whether in the forwards or backs. A quick backrow spending time in the midfield isn't going to be the end of the world if required in an emergency. It's also why for me, whoever is in the 23 shirt, doesn't get on the pitch outside of injury, or 5 minutes left in the game.Danno wrote:
If he or someone similar like Earl ever got the odd cameo there at their club I might be ok with the idea that they could do 10mins of a test in the centre, but on its own it's what happened with [redacted].
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: The Ideal Bench
You mean we could have a bench of Genge, Blamire, Stuart, Launch, Dombrandt, Simmonds, Earl, Quirke16th man wrote:Give it a day or so and I'm sure it'll move onto if a backrower is able to cover centres and wing, so we can get Earls, Simmonds, Dombrandt and one of the Wasps brothers on the bench.Mikey Brown wrote:Is this whole conversation talking about the 1 non-scrumhalf spot on a 6:2 bench now?Raggs wrote:
He didn't know how to play union whether in the forwards or backs. A quick backrow spending time in the midfield isn't going to be the end of the world if required in an emergency. It's also why for me, whoever is in the 23 shirt, doesn't get on the pitch outside of injury, or 5 minutes left in the game.
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
Replace Blamire with Barbeary when he's fit and we're finally at a sensible bench mix.Stom wrote:You mean we could have a bench of Genge, Blamire, Stuart, Launch, Dombrandt, Simmonds, Earl, Quirke16th man wrote:Give it a day or so and I'm sure it'll move onto if a backrower is able to cover centres and wing, so we can get Earls, Simmonds, Dombrandt and one of the Wasps brothers on the bench.Mikey Brown wrote:
Is this whole conversation talking about the 1 non-scrumhalf spot on a 6:2 bench now?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9318
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: The Ideal Bench
Surely you need Jack Nowell to cover flanker
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: The Ideal Bench
I think if I was Malins, I'd be clamouring to play on the wing in club matches. If Steward has nailed the 15 shirt, it's Malins best chance of starting for England. He must fear being a utility bench option otherwise. Somebody - him, Furbank, Mallinder or whoever - is bound to get the slot in a 6:2 bench. Malins has the pace to offer three positions, wing, FB and FH, so he could be earmarked. The others might push Marchant or Tuilagi back out to the wing should a starting winger get injured.
Lozowski just might be a good call, p/d.
Lozowski just might be a good call, p/d.
-
- Posts: 12201
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
Mallinder? I mean theoretically him and Lozowski would be the best in terms of coverage, but it feels like AL is another victim of Japan 2018 and Mallinder hasn't got even close to rounding his game out enough for a shot.
God knows why we're even discussing 7:1 though. There really is a void when an international window closes.
God knows why we're even discussing 7:1 though. There really is a void when an international window closes.
- Puja
- Posts: 17781
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
I mean, Eddie was talking about BCurry coveting scrumhalf at one point, so we don't have to stop at 7:1...Mikey Brown wrote:God knows why we're even discussing 7:1 though. There really is a void when an international window closes.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: The Ideal Bench
You want cover at 9, 10 and 15. The more that comes in the starting XV the more your bench can include an out and out X factor, be it pace, power or both, and the more you can have cover at centre to enable a change in the front three to cater for the collisions taken during the game to that point. In advance you don't need to be prescriptive about what the bench needsSpiffy wrote: You want three backs on the bench ; a proper 9, a proper 10 and a utility back to cover the rest. Your example of Daly is a good one.
I'll also repeat myself and say if coaches are picking 6:2 splits it's another good reason to drop the bench slots down to 7
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
Lightly oiled Iroko with a curvaceous back
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: The Ideal Bench
Good god man, you'll have the greens all over you for that. Perhaps you meant reclaimed iroko?
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
Why have green top milk when blue top is so much betterDigby wrote:Good god man, you'll have the greens all over you for that. Perhaps you meant reclaimed iroko?

-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: The Ideal Bench
As a non fan of milk the blue top actually stands a chance of getting me to vomit. Don't know why as I really like cheese, but I also really dislike milk.p/d wrote:Why have green top milk when blue top is so much betterDigby wrote:Good god man, you'll have the greens all over you for that. Perhaps you meant reclaimed iroko?
There's a chap I work with who goes so far the other way he makes tea, well spicy chai, using creamy buffalo milk heated in the microwave and no added water
-
- Posts: 12201
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
Oakboy please do the right thing and delete this thread.
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
6 parts water 2 parts full fat.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: The Ideal Bench
They have to have their fun occasionally, bless them!Mikey Brown wrote:Oakboy please do the right thing and delete this thread.


-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
Because we're kink positive and are supportive of those members of our community for whom this is a fetish.Mikey Brown wrote:
God knows why we're even discussing 7:1 though. There really is a void when an international window closes.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9318
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: The Ideal Bench
16th man wrote:Because we're kink positive and are supportive of those members of our community for whom this is a fetish.Mikey Brown wrote:
God knows why we're even discussing 7:1 though. There really is a void when an international window closes.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1987
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
This is a great chance for Jones to convert George Ford to 9. He is already a brilliant 10 and with his rugby smarts, pass, speed and kicking game you know he'd be a great 9. Two for the price of one! The Frogs used to do it all the time.Digby wrote:You want cover at 9, 10 and 15. The more that comes in the starting XV the more your bench can include an out and out X factor, be it pace, power or both, and the more you can have cover at centre to enable a change in the front three to cater for the collisions taken during the game to that point. In advance you don't need to be prescriptive about what the bench needsSpiffy wrote: You want three backs on the bench ; a proper 9, a proper 10 and a utility back to cover the rest. Your example of Daly is a good one.
I'll also repeat myself and say if coaches are picking 6:2 splits it's another good reason to drop the bench slots down to 7
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: The Ideal Bench
Nice try, but I doubt anyone is going to bite on thatSpiffy wrote:This is a great chance for Jones to convert George Ford to 9. He is already a brilliant 10 and with his rugby smarts, pass, speed and kicking game you know he'd be a great 9. Two for the price of one! The Frogs used to do it all the time.Digby wrote:You want cover at 9, 10 and 15. The more that comes in the starting XV the more your bench can include an out and out X factor, be it pace, power or both, and the more you can have cover at centre to enable a change in the front three to cater for the collisions taken during the game to that point. In advance you don't need to be prescriptive about what the bench needsSpiffy wrote: You want three backs on the bench ; a proper 9, a proper 10 and a utility back to cover the rest. Your example of Daly is a good one.
I'll also repeat myself and say if coaches are picking 6:2 splits it's another good reason to drop the bench slots down to 7
- Puja
- Posts: 17781
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
I mean, he did a belting job for Leicester recently when our 9 was yellow-carded...Spiffy wrote:This is a great chance for Jones to convert George Ford to 9. He is already a brilliant 10 and with his rugby smarts, pass, speed and kicking game you know he'd be a great 9. Two for the price of one! The Frogs used to do it all the time.Digby wrote:You want cover at 9, 10 and 15. The more that comes in the starting XV the more your bench can include an out and out X factor, be it pace, power or both, and the more you can have cover at centre to enable a change in the front three to cater for the collisions taken during the game to that point. In advance you don't need to be prescriptive about what the bench needsSpiffy wrote: You want three backs on the bench ; a proper 9, a proper 10 and a utility back to cover the rest. Your example of Daly is a good one.
I'll also repeat myself and say if coaches are picking 6:2 splits it's another good reason to drop the bench slots down to 7
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 19270
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: The Ideal Bench
That ship has Sale'd.Spiffy wrote:This is a great chance for Jones to convert George Ford to 9. He is already a brilliant 10 and with his rugby smarts, pass, speed and kicking game you know he'd be a great 9. Two for the price of one! The Frogs used to do it all the time.Digby wrote:You want cover at 9, 10 and 15. The more that comes in the starting XV the more your bench can include an out and out X factor, be it pace, power or both, and the more you can have cover at centre to enable a change in the front three to cater for the collisions taken during the game to that point. In advance you don't need to be prescriptive about what the bench needsSpiffy wrote: You want three backs on the bench ; a proper 9, a proper 10 and a utility back to cover the rest. Your example of Daly is a good one.
I'll also repeat myself and say if coaches are picking 6:2 splits it's another good reason to drop the bench slots down to 7